radios shipping overview
Member
Is it possible for a 20-year-old show that inspired a generation of comedians and social commenters (professional and amateur) to still claim to be subversive?
Early South Park had no social commentary.
I mean, they're not wrong. South Park has worked towards appealing to rightwingers and both sides libertarians for years on years on years. This isn't unknown.
So... should they have not done it at all? I thought this was generally received as great commentary on race.
That is such bullshit.
Is there a place I can go to get certified as woke?
I mean, they're not wrong. South Park has worked towards appealing to rightwingers and both sides libertarians for years on years on years. This isn't unknown.
Oh really? I had no idea about that. So it was some kind of self-branded term that came from young conservatives? Again I've only heard it on this forum in the past year in the context I've mentioned so I had no idea about the origins/history of the term and it's original meaning.
Come on, South Park is far from appealing to Right Wingers.
Not really. And it's so weird to me that people continually deny what has been there for numerous seasons, all the way back to the Bush presidency.
Until you consider what the choices look like to an actual black gamer who wants to play as a black character. We all get hard mode in game as well as in life. Lessons for everyone!
Could be because you're wrong? This crowd of people bitching about South Park being "both sides" directly correlates with the rise of "if you're not 100% on my side you're a right winger"
Some people argue they were "too soft" on Trump and claimed they didn't pick a side. It couldn't have been anymore clear. They painted Hilary as unlikable, but infinitely more qualified than Trump. They painted Trump as an absolute insane mad man who was actively trying not to get elected because he was so incompetent, but his supporters were too fucking dense to realize that.
It's not even that they fence sit, really. They have no problem calling people or ideas out, and that's not what someone who is riding the line does. It's more like they have more interest in picking on people who AREN'T being picked on or voices that have come on so strong, it's struck them as personally annoying.
All these angry blogs and articles about how South Park isn't "subversive" or "raised a generation of trolls" miss the point of South Park. It's not here to educate you or reinforce right and wrong beliefs. They'll use it to express some specific thought or view, but ultimately it's there to mock everything and anything.
There has to be SOME room for absurdism left.
I don't get it. Why is it irresponsible?
I mean...South Park Republicans is a real term these people gave themselves. And it's not like the show has changed at all.
Because they like to make out their above any agenda, yet their show is often preachy and regularly engages with social, racial and political issues. The way they engage is often provocative and critical of one side or another but ultimately fence sits or fails to draw any logical conclusion. As a result they happily court an audience of people with shitty beliefs.
I got tired of South Park's 'both sides are shitty' schtick back in season 6 or so.I see people still have not gotten over PC Principle.
South Park goes after Hollywood liberals and has also attacked Al Gore and Michael Moore pretty hard. It's hard to think of a conservative political figure they've gone after the same way. It's more of a sensibility than a coherent ideological but I don't see how you can deny they lean a bit conservative.
That is such bullshit.
I mean...South Park Republicans is a real term these people gave themselves. And it's not like the show has changed at all.
I'm gonna let you in on a little secret, don't tell!
The "difficulty slider" doesn't actually change anything but skin tone. It's a joke.
I see people still have not gotten over PC Principle.
Good job dismissing all the criticism at hand.
Is it possible for a 20-year-old show that inspired a generation of comedians and social commenters (professional and amateur) to still claim to be subversive?
So you're talking about an extremely nice group who take their inspiration for their political affiliation from a show, that is mercilessly mocking their party and it's supporters regularly? Did you know Ronald Reagan used "born in the USA" as his campaign song without realizing the song was actually against his beliefs? Yeah Bruce Springsteen is such a fucking right winger right?
I'll never understand when/why people decided South Park had some moral obligation to be progressive. It's an over the top satire show.
Because they like to make out their above any agenda, yet their show is often preachy and regularly engages with social, racial and political issues. The way they engage is often provocative and critical of one side or another but ultimately contrary or fence-sitting and fails to draw any coherent conclusion. As a result they happily court an audience of people with shitty beliefs.
I was responding to the idea the show doesn't appeal to fuck headed right wingers. It does. En masse. But sure, distort my statements and pretend like these people don't exist.
It rears it's head as some sort of litmus test that if someone on the right laughs at a joke or likes a show then that must mean it's appealing to them/endorsing them. Newsflash, even with the large political differences the left and right have people on both sides can eat the same food, wear the same clothes, listen to the same music, play the same games and watch the same TV shows. I'm pretty sure there is some Conservatives watching Game of Thrones right now. Darn it.
I'm on the left and have been all my life but I don't see reality as such a divide where people on the left and right don't ever overlap. It can't be! We're enemies 24/7! When we're talking about cartoons, video games and music, sorry folks, people you don't like will have overlapping interest and hobbies to you. The arguments you see often around SP usually say Cartman is an idol of the right. So? If people take Cartman literally that's on their dumb asses. Others, like you, can laugh at Cartman and it doesn't mean you're secretly on the right because you laughed. This ties back into me saying people have to find ways to take life less seriously without a constant litmus test for being... woke I guess, seeing as woke is the world the article keeps using.
Because they like to make out they're above any agenda, yet their show is often preachy and regularly engages with social, racial and political issues. The way they engage is often provocative and critical of one side or another but ultimately contrary or fence-sitting and fails to draw any coherent conclusion. As a result they happily court an audience of people with shitty beliefs.
I'm gonna let you in on a little secret, don't tell!
The "difficulty slider" doesn't actually change anything but skin tone. It's a joke.
I was responding to the idea the show doesn't appeal to fuck headed right wingers. It does. En masse. But sure, distort my statements and pretend like these people don't exist.
Comparing SP to absurdism is an insult to absurdist theatre.
There's about no comparison to make.
If you don't think South Park is intentionally positioning itself to be ridiculous or over the top as a matter of entertainment and NOT social commentary, I don't know what to say about that.
LOL who gives a shit that it appeals to them? I just pointed out that born in the USA became a literal theme song for the Republican party. Know why? Because their dumbasses missed the point.
You realize Rick and Morty has a massive following by anti pc crowd right?
I stopped reading after the third 'woke'.
My personal view on it would be that I don't think it's so much that they lean conservative, I think it's more that they lean maybe 80 - 90% liberal and anything but 100% compliance is seen as the enemy from some people. (Again not aiming that at you personally).