That's the angle I've been waiting for. Thank you very much.
The long exposure photo is one of the coolest photographs I have ever seen. 660 seconds, f22, 100 ISO, perfectly captured... desktop wallpaper GET.
There was a new one, but it was ignored :]
Here.
that was a dead on, balls accurate landing.
Missed this one, amazing!I thought this one was even better: https://twitter.com/Mike_Seeley/status/679123952128651264
Wow. That came in much faster than I had expected. That is what we call a "Suicide Burn" in Kerbal Space Program....
Well technically isn't that the most efficient option, if scary to watch..
Well technically isn't that the most efficient option, if scary to watch..
As exciting as it was too watch it succeed in kind of wanting to see this as I think it would be hilarious. "Prepare for touchdown in 3,2,1 aaaaand there she goes again..."It is, though more importantly than efficiency, it's the only it can be done on such a powerful rocket. Unless they equip it with a low powered landing only engine, it's impossible for the engine to throttle down low enough for a slower landing. The rocket has too high a thrust to weight ratio to hover or descend at a constant speed, so the only option is to decelerate it all the way down so it hits 0 velocity exactly when it lands. decelerating too early will actually cause it to climb again.
There was a new one, but it was ignored :]
Here.
I thought they knew it would work on land, but the sea landing was the tricky one.
You cross post away
After some thought, I would go as far as saying that last night's landing is the biggest moment in rocketry advancement since the Moon landings. Achievement wise, maybe Curiosity landing aside, I cannot think of many bigger achievements.
I'm expecting ULA's pending capture of falling 1st stages mid-air with nets and helicopters to eclipse SpaceX's landing.You cross post away
After some thought, I would go as far as saying that last night's landing is the biggest moment in rocketry advancement since the Moon landings. Achievement wise, maybe Curiosity landing aside, I cannot think of many bigger achievements.
Flawed as it was, I'd put STS-1 up there. First flight of that whole system and they had pilots on board. Balls of steel and it's amazing they ever got that frankenstein of a machine to fly as reliably as it did.
I'm expecting ULA's pending capture of falling 1st stages mid-air with nets and helicopters to eclipse SpaceX's landing.
I'm expecting ULA's pending capture of falling 1st stages mid-air with nets and helicopters to eclipse SpaceX's landing.
Guys, I was being facetious.
I got a little hint of that but when I thought about it, it will require some serious, SpaceX-like engineering that will be immensely impressive if they nail it.
At the risk of not knowing how much SpaceX can turn over a reusable Falcon 9 into a launch ready unit on second use, I don't suppose the ULA solution will be as financially loss-reducing as SpaceX.
I just saw Elon's landing site video. Only a few seconds, but again it shows the size of F9. https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/679145544673923072
Is this kind of recovery system really that feasible? I would imagine that the fuel requirements for a self landing lower-stage could significantly decrease the payload capacity of the whole rocket. It's an impressive system but I don't see how it could compete with the rocket platforms that are available today.
Is this kind of recovery system really that feasible? I would imagine that the fuel requirements for a self landing lower-stage could significantly decrease the payload capacity of the whole rocket. It's an impressive system but I don't see how it could compete with the rocket platforms that are available today.
By late 2013, with a published price of US$56.5 million per launch to low Earth orbit, "Falcon 9 rockets [were] already the cheapest in the industry. Reusable Falcon 9s could drop the price by an order of magnitude, sparking more space-based enterprise, which in turn would drop the cost of access to space still further through economies of scale."[125]
Is this kind of recovery system really that feasible? I would imagine that the fuel requirements for a self landing lower-stage could significantly decrease the payload capacity of the whole rocket. It's an impressive system but I don't see how it could compete with the rocket platforms that are available today.