A friend who I usually hate to discuss movies with, because he is ALWAYS positive and noncritical about them, wrote me today.So season 3 is over, and it has been a load of bull.
- The Burn was caused by some autistic kid who freaked out over his mother dying (at least it wasn't Burnham this time)
- Burnham is now captain of Discovery and Saru left without even a goodbye scene (the admiral was nearly brought to tears when promoting Burnham to captain )
- There are silly Star Wars like robots on Discovery
- The ship is mostly empty space which makes no sense whatsoever
- Culber and Stamets met this non-binary human and together with the Smurf symbionth which is inside them (lol) they're one happy queer family
- The Federation is already rebuilding after 1 season
- Georgiou went not only back in time but also to the mirror universe (yawn) and left the show
What a waste. The premise of this season (and the whole show for that matter) had great potential. But the writers have no idea how to write good characters and that is why we ended up with Burnham and this shitshow. It's sad what Star Trek has become.
Dude, opinions are opinions.I'll probably get cancelled or something for saying this, but I loved this season. Couldn't turn my eyes of during the finale. A 10/10 episode from me.
I'll probably get cancelled or something for saying this, but I loved this season. Couldn't turn my eyes of during the finale. A 10/10 episode from me.
You were sounding so happy in the beginning.This season would have an OK episode and then follow it up with complete shit. And I liked Season 2 a lot. This season was a huge disappointment.
I also liked itI'll probably get cancelled or something for saying this, but I loved this season. Couldn't turn my eyes of during the finale. A 10/10 episode from me.
CANCEL HIM!I also liked it
I kind of liked the first two seasons.Does this show get ratings? Why TF are there 3 seasons?!
I doubted for many years that Kurtzman is the problem, but I am rather convinced now about it.I find the show entertaining in its own right, but it sucks as a Star Trek show.
I do have high hopes for Strange New Worlds.
I doubted for many years that Kurtzman is the problem, but I am rather convinced now about it.
So, I have hopes, but I am completely aware this might be futile.
I like the first one, and didn't really mind the second one that everybody hates.Unpopular opinion, but I really enjoyed the JJ films
I think you've hit upon something about the show that really bugs me about it in general.This season had a couple of episodes in the middle where it looked like it could ascend to the lofty heights of decent-ish, then quickly descended into incoherent babbling again. Even its more interesting ideas were hamstrung by the incompetence which preceded them: that Osyraa (or however you spell it) wanted to merge her trading group with the Federation was a nice idea, and the Admiral's insistence she had to stand trial for her crimes if the merger was to have any legitimacy was morally correct - it was Discovery's first genuine attempt at tackling the sort of ethical dilemma which should be at the heart of Treks storytelling. What a shame, then, that the same Admiral had willingly accepted the genocidal Georgiou into the Federation with absolutely no consequences only a short time prior, not to mention that the Federation has done deals with the Klingons and other species who have not exactly been shy the occasional war crime and massacre. The merger was also hamstrung by the fact Osyraa had no reason to do it whatsoever: once she had Discovery, she held every possible card and advantage. Even if she were seeking to grant the Emerald Chain (awful name) the legitimacy which being allied to the Federation would supposedly confer, it had been established that the Federation's collapse had left it largely resented and discredited. Its situation was no better than hers.
And in Discovery, his list is:
Fixed that for him1) Micheal Burnham
Think one second about the fact, that every other major character in Star Trek only exists because Michael Burnham saved them.Fixed that for him
Seriously he is right, but also, Micheal does everything it seems. I might grow to like the other characters if the writers let them save the day once in awhile
Think one second about the fact, that every other major character in Star Trek only exists because Michael Burnham saved them.
This season had a couple of episodes in the middle where it looked like it could ascend to the lofty heights of decent-ish, then quickly descended into incoherent babbling again. Even its more interesting ideas were hamstrung by the incompetence which preceded them: that Osyraa (or however you spell it) wanted to merge her trading group with the Federation was a nice idea, and the Admiral's insistence she had to stand trial for her crimes if the merger was to have any legitimacy was morally correct - it was Discovery's first genuine attempt at tackling the sort of ethical dilemma which should be at the heart of Treks storytelling. What a shame, then, that the same Admiral had willingly accepted the genocidal Georgiou into the Federation with absolutely no consequences only a short time prior, not to mention that the Federation has done deals with the Klingons and other species who have not exactly been shy the occasional war crime and massacre. The merger was also hamstrung by the fact Osyraa had no reason to do it whatsoever: once she had Discovery, she held every possible card and advantage. Even if she were seeking to grant the Emerald Chain (awful name) the legitimacy which being allied to the Federation would supposedly confer, it had been established that the Federation's collapse had left it largely resented and discredited. Its situation was no better than hers.
(Also: even aside from the incessant weeping, Burnham is in no way captain material. You might have a renegade thinker as first officer to present even option, but never as captain where the crew could be put in serious danger.)
As an aside, it amuses me when a show's creators and crew go out of their way to show their deference to identity dogma, yet end up compartmentalising it all in one place, such as how every Netflix series features a gay, minority (sometimes trans) best friend, ticking multiple boxes with one character. As in all things, Discovery takes this to an even more ludicrous extreme by having the series' only gay couple become the adoptive parents to a 'non-binary' teen partially possessed by a trans-boyfriend (at least in Adira's specific case of multiple personality, using 'they' as a not-quite-singular pronoun makes some degree of grammatical sense). Way to cordon off your queers, chaps.
Yeah. In Star Trek Michael Burnham is the BEST.Think one second about the fact, that every other major character in Star Trek only exists because Michael Burnham saved them.
I sometimes wonder if these times will be studied by future students of cinematography as the dark ages.And you wonder why these franchises are struggling? What with the blatant Mary Sue protagonists that woke creators seem to favor as their default.
I'm not against people trying new things with old franchises. But the changes some woke creatives have made show a blatant disrespect for the legacy of these properties and their audience.I sometimes wonder if these times will be studied by future students of cinematography as the dark ages.
I mean, there is a lot of great stuff coming out that simply gets it.
But wow, how some of movies greatest IPs have been butchered on the altar of woke and "subverting expectation" is really crazy.
I wonder if they have seen what has been done with Cobra Kai, and took some notice.It makes what Jon Favreau is doing with The Mandalorian even more miraculous by comparison. It's a show that's doing new things with the universe but is still paying homage (but not slavishly so like Rogue One) to the Original trilogy.
You mentioned subverting expectations. I barely remember The Karate Kid, but what I remember of the character of Johnny Lawrence was how much of an asshole he was with his fellow Cobra Kai mates.I wonder if they have seen what has been done with Cobra Kai, and took some notice.
You mentioned subverting expectations. I barely remember The Karate Kid, but what I remember of the character of Johnny Lawrence was how much of an asshole he was with his fellow Cobra Kai mates.
And you're going to make a sequel tv show about him? The bad guy? And somehow make it work by letting the audience sympathize with him?
If that's a not a good example of subverting your expectations, I don't know what is. Rian Johnson ought to hang his head in shame.