Streamer Sparks Debate Over Whether Twitch Should Allow Breastfeeding.

Breastfeeding is fine, but on a game streaming site? I don't think there's any doubt this chick is doing it for attention whoring purposes only.
 
It's the internet. Gotta let everyone know what you're doing you're own way.

Next up......

..... man streams interview while taking a shit.
 
Heimdall_Xtreme said:
Breastfeeding is necessary for human development, it is even a normal practice of humanity. I don't understand why there is still stigma in this action.
Click to expand...
There's a time and place for breastfeeding.

Doing it on camera on Twitch in a 10 second clip seems unreasonable. The baby can wait a few minutes.

So is taking a baby in to suck tits at a job interview. Not the right time to do it.
 
StreetsofBeige said:
There's a time and place for breastfeeding.

Doing it on camera on Twitch in a 10 second clip seems unreasonable. The baby can wait a few minutes.

So is taking a baby in to suck tits at a job interview. Not the right time to do it.
Click to expand...

Or they could do it then and there, but turn off the camera. Or simply not be on camera.
 
I'd genuinely like to know, what bothers people so much about breastfeeding in public? Why is it frowned upon? I thought it was an issue to the breastfeeder i.e. her privacy but if she does not have an issue with it, why are other people bothered by it?
 
StreetsofBeige said:
There's a time and place for breastfeeding.

Doing it on camera on Twitch in a 10 second clip seems unreasonable. The baby can wait a few minutes.

So is taking a baby in to suck tits at a job interview. Not the right time to do it.
Click to expand...

People see it badly, others see it normal. For me it is a natural and normal behavior.
 
StreetsofBeige said:
So is taking a dump. Pretty sure that would be frowned upon if someone wanted to stream or upload a video of themselves wiping their ass before a Twitch feed.

Show people respect.
Click to expand...
In case the streamers show trash daily, so it is so simple not to see them.

Don't confuse a baby's need, compared to other adult behaviors
 
Neolombax said:
I'd genuinely like to know, what bothers people so much about breastfeeding in public? Why is it frowned upon? I thought it was an issue to the breastfeeder i.e. her privacy but if she does not have an issue with it, why are other people bothered by it?
Click to expand...
As long as it's done respectfully, nobody really cares about public space because it's your own space and time. Everyone is doing their own thing.

Doing it on a camera feed where the point of it is games, movies, a politician talking about policies or someone talking about their company's latest quarterly earnings report is pretty odd to have someone on camera having a baby sucking their tit at the same time.
 
ArchaeEnkidu said:
Or they could do it then and there, but turn off the camera. Or simply not be on camera.
Click to expand...
It is the internet.

Gotta get those clicks at any cost.

Next up...... hey camera crew, for the next video let's do it when it's time to change the baby's dirty diaper.
 
Last edited:
Miss Milker's case here is different than the stigma with breastfeeding in public. Sometimes, if you've got the tiny human in tow, it needs feeding and there isn't always a private space to do it. I'm not a fan, but I get it and just ignore it if I happen to see it.

Bewbalicious in this case is streaming from a private place already. There's no necessity in having to subject a viewing public to it. She can AFK. She can schedule shorter streams during this time of need. She just feels entitled to stream what should be a private activity— and expose her child to public eyes without its consent— because she wants attention. It's a willful choice.

Unfortunately for her, streaming platforms don't have to allow acts like this to be aired. No accommodations are needed, because again: She is doing this from home, where there are already plenty of accommodations that she is choosing not to utilize.
 
I was in a japanese restaurant, and a (problaby)japanese woman was breastfeeding her baby. I didn't think it was a problem at all, nobody cared. But doing it on stream I feel like its only for the clicks. I find it slighty disgusting to using your child. Boob streaming should die. Get a job or stream quality content
 
Aintitcool said:
Well I am american(south america) but not from the USA. Nipple is a sexual organ as well as a feeding one. In the US it's banned on national TV even late at night. And in europe in public advertising its banned too and only allowed on after 10PM on public TV from germany and austria. It isn't however banned in beaches and lakes. And if it happens we don't shame women for it. We have a history of art with bare breast presenting beauty. The christian protestant of the USA forbid it. And lack that catholic art culture.

I don't think it's an issue of arrasaul, more men who hate their mothers and women in general. Seeing a bare breast invites the male gaze. When the baby is the one on the nipple I think that discourages sexuality.(removing unwanted viewers) But the moment the nipple is out without a baby covering it, is when snapshots can be made of the woman and spread around the net. So for her own sanity that she should avoid on stream.

Someone filmed how random american men will go up to a breastfeeding woman and bother her telling her to cover it up and stuff while she sat next to her friend in a push up bra and low cut next to her.


I don't get how these men go to a random MOTHER and tell her she is a problem. But it is a thing in the US, and this thread also has examples of the madness.
Click to expand...


Yeah, but my question was "why?".

And the nipple is allowed on TV at all hours here, it's the nature of the content that defines if it'll be aired late. So say someone feeding a child, or a science program talking about the body could be any time of day, while someone licking and fondling a breast in a sexual manner would be late.

Anything can be sexual. Some places knees and ancles are sexual.
 
Fuz said:
No, it's not.
Click to expand...
I mean even on neogaf our pervy threads are very censored. I saw no nipple on neogaf yet
Contica said:
Yeah, but my question was "why?".

And the nipple is allowed on TV at all hours here, it's the nature of the content that defines if it'll be aired late. So say someone feeding a child, or a science program talking about the body could be any time of day, while someone licking and fondling a breast in a sexual manner would be late.

Anything can be sexual. Some places knees and ancles are sexual.
Click to expand...
IF you really want to go into a rabbit hole of why. I personally think it's circumcised men vs uncircumcised. The relationship to ones mother can become very deranged when you're an infant-3 years old getting cut and in pain for months. With only breast feeding and your mother comfort carrying you through the pain. A side effect of circumcision: https://circumcision.org/how-male-circumcision-harms-women/

Europe will pull real photography of bare breast and nipple in advertising. Yes it can be on tv even during the day and no big fuss happens depending on context. For example Fashion TV has no such issues. But the standard of moving it to post 10pm is very real on german television too.
 
Petrae said:
Miss Milker's case here is different than the stigma with breastfeeding in public. Sometimes, if you've got the tiny human in tow, it needs feeding and there isn't always a private space to do it. I'm not a fan, but I get it and just ignore it if I happen to see it.

Bewbalicious in this case is streaming from a private place already. There's no necessity in having to subject a viewing public to it. She can AFK. She can schedule shorter streams during this time of need. She just feels entitled to stream what should be a private activity— and expose her child to public eyes without its consent— because she wants attention. It's a willful choice.

Unfortunately for her, streaming platforms don't have to allow acts like this to be aired. No accommodations are needed, because again: She is doing this from home, where there are already plenty of accommodations that she is choosing not to utilize.
Click to expand...


This!
 
86555fd82e82d28171d4272994476772.gif



tenor.gif
 
Petrae said:
Miss Milker's case here is different than the stigma with breastfeeding in public. Sometimes, if you've got the tiny human in tow, it needs feeding and there isn't always a private space to do it. I'm not a fan, but I get it and just ignore it if I happen to see it.

Bewbalicious in this case is streaming from a private place already. There's no necessity in having to subject a viewing public to it. She can AFK. She can schedule shorter streams during this time of need. She just feels entitled to stream what should be a private activity— and expose her child to public eyes without its consent— because she wants attention. It's a willful choice.

Unfortunately for her, streaming platforms don't have to allow acts like this to be aired. No accommodations are needed, because again: She is doing this from home, where there are already plenty of accommodations that she is choosing not to utilize.
Click to expand...
Yeah that's where I have a hard time understanding the people who seem to disagree with this idea somehow.

Streamers have all sorts of things they can do with their feed. If I was a streamer who had to whip out something that isn't supposed to be whipped out in front of the camera, I'd just press a button on my keyboard and it would switch scenes to a static image that says "BRB" or something on it. It's so simple. Pretending that she was involuntarily on display in this situation is asinine.
 
I'm all for it in public, but usually women don't want to attract too much attention to it, so the idea of doing it on camera with breast fully on show is a strange one to me. But I also don't sexualise breasts when it comes to breastfeeding, although many people do which is why Twitch probably thinks it's best to not allow it.
 
Aintitcool said:
I mean even on neogaf our pervy threads are very censored. I saw no nipple on neogaf yet

IF you really want to go into a rabbit hole of why. I personally think it's circumcised men vs uncircumcised. The relationship to ones mother can become very deranged when you're an infant-3 years old getting cut and in pain for months. With only breast feeding and your mother comfort carrying you through the pain. A side effect of circumcision: https://circumcision.org/how-male-circumcision-harms-women/

Europe will pull real photography of bare breast and nipple in advertising. Yes it can be on tv even during the day and no big fuss happens depending on context. For example Fashion TV has no such issues. But the standard of moving it to post 10pm is very real on german television too.
Click to expand...

Uhm, I'm not german, but I've been there, and you might be a tiny bit confused. What came on at ten wasn't a plain nipple in a movie or whatever, it was soft porn. A bit later at night came the tv ads for sex phone lines.

I've seen exposed bushy ladyparts on screen on TV in the afternoon in my country. But it wasn't sexual. It all depends on context.

I'm fascinated by how this suddenly became about circumcision though, had not thought of that, and not sure what to think about it. It makes some morbid kind of sense though that a culture that deems it fine to mutilate baby boys has a weird relationship with bodies in general.
 
Contica said:
Uhm, I'm not german, but I've been there, and you might be a tiny bit confused. What came on at ten wasn't a plain nipple in a movie or whatever, it was soft porn. A bit later at night came the tv ads for sex phone lines.

I've seen exposed bushy ladyparts on screen on TV in the afternoon in my country. But it wasn't sexual. It all depends on context.

I'm fascinated by how this suddenly became about circumcision though, had not thought of that, and not sure what to think about it. It makes some morbid kind of sense though that a culture that deems it fine to mutilate baby boys has a weird relationship with bodies in general.
Click to expand...
And I fucking lived in Austria 21 years now. I definitely can say what the TV stations and advertising standards do here. (Especially since germany shares all its public tv stations and cable shows with austria.) Yes in nature and a non-sexual context you can get away with both male and female nudity. Context of art also applies. But this is the law and standards:

www.br.de

Schluss mit sexistischer Werbung: Mit Brüsten werben ist so 1999 | BR.de

"Sex sells" immer noch. Da müssen Brüste auch mal für Fliesen herhalten. Wer keine Lust auf sexistische Werbung hat, kann sich jetzt wehren, bei "Werbemelder.in". Die Macher der Seite kämpfen gegen nackte Haut auf Werbeplakaten.
www.br.de www.br.de

It is very different than the USA. I remember buying teen magazines that displayed a woman and man who were 18 completely nude to spread different body awareness. Full out naked 18 year old male and female side by side with their life story in a short bio. In a weekly magazine. Nothing you can sexualize unless you want it too. More like biology textbook.
 
Last edited:
Aintitcool said:
And I fucking lived in Austria 21 years now. I definitely can say what the TV stations and advertising standards do here. (Especially since germany shares all its public tv stations and cable shows with austria.) Yes in nature and a non-sexual context you can get away with both male and female nudity. Context of art also applies. But this is the law and standards:

www.br.de

Schluss mit sexistischer Werbung: Mit Brüsten werben ist so 1999 | BR.de

"Sex sells" immer noch. Da müssen Brüste auch mal für Fliesen herhalten. Wer keine Lust auf sexistische Werbung hat, kann sich jetzt wehren, bei "Werbemelder.in". Die Macher der Seite kämpfen gegen nackte Haut auf Werbeplakaten.
www.br.de www.br.de

It is very different than the USA. I remember buying teen magazines that displayed a woman and man who were 18 completely nude to spread different body awareness. Full out naked 18 year old male and female side by side with their life story in a short bio. In a weekly magazine. Nothing you can sexualize unless you want it too. More like biology textbook.
Click to expand...
Yeah, Bayrischer Rundfunk ... @Contica got it pretty spot on, after 10 in the evening (never got it right with this silly am/pm) in german free tv everything goes that's not outright hardcore porn they even cut down some "story heavy" porn movies to broadcast them. In the 90's we may not had the internet, but goddamn we stayed up late for a reason!
Source: german here!
 
Damien Crowley said:
Yeah, Bayrischer Rundfunk ... @Contica got it pretty spot on, after 10 in the evening (never got it right with this silly am/pm) in german free tv everything goes that's not outright hardcore porn they even cut down some "story heavy" porn movies to broadcast them. In the 90's we may not had the internet, but goddamn we stayed up late for a reason!
Source: german here!
Click to expand...
The news channels will show uncensored news with nudity if its there only after 10PM. Its disengenius to claim the post 10pm standard of germany is only for softcore/porno sex lines. It is a similar censorship to the states. Source: I too stayed up for the eurosport channel strip shows. Lingerie advertising in PUBLIC can not show nipple here too. Magazines, everything else practically yup no problem. We don't cover up museum statues either. When it is in the context of art/nature/biology europe does nothing. But we do censor it. And especially now with the larger muslim population it happens as a standard.
 
Last edited:
Closest thing to prime time nudity allowed on US tv is if it's the victim of a sexual crime ending up as a corpse in Law and Order: SVU
 
Last edited:
Aintitcool said:
The news channels will show uncensored news with nudity if its there only after 10PM. Its disengenius to claim the post 10pm standard of germany is only for softcore/porno sex lines. It is a similar censorship to the states. Source: I too stayed up for the eurosport channel strip shows.
Click to expand...
Well not in ALL of the programming, but VOX an Kabel 1 were notourious on (i think) thursdays and fridays... and you meant DSF not eurosport! ;)
 
I'm really for people getting over it and allowing women to breastfeed wherever they need to, though I do think some sort of cover is in order (because do they really want creepers getting off on it?)
 
Aintitcool said:
Someone filmed how random american men will go up to a breastfeeding woman and bother her telling her to cover it up and stuff while she sat next to her friend in a push up bra and low cut next to her.


I don't get how these men go to a random MOTHER and tell her she is a problem. But it is a thing in the US, and this thread also has examples of the madness.
Click to expand...

Did you seriously just post a Joey Salads video as proof? :messenger_tears_of_joy:
 
Last edited:
Fuz said:
And some women can have orgasms with anal sex, feet stimulation or just being whipped and tied. So?

They're *still* not sexual organs.
Click to expand...
The women orgasm happens via anal is because the G Spot can be stimulated from the anus. Via the vaginal wall that borders it. From gay men I heard they enjoy the surreal feeling of stimulated prostate glands. (though having never felt this I don't want to comment on it but it doesn't cause the man being anally stimulated to ejaculate).

Fetish pleasure from tied up and abuse. Is not orgasm inducing. It is the pain pleasure mix that thrives them. A dominant pleasuring his subject as a mercy from the pain. I don't want to become a sex ed educator. But I see validity in the argument. To me a woman's nipple is a sexual organ. But the anus is not. So that's where subjectivity does fall in.
Trojita said:
Did you seriously just post a Joey Salads video as proof? :messenger_tears_of_joy:
Click to expand...
I mean this thread is also proof. That is a video example. Not very well produced or a sociological study but definitely based on reality.
 
Last edited:
Aintitcool said:
The women orgasm happens via anal is because the G Spot can be stimulated from the anus. Via the wall.

Fetish pleasure from tied up and abuse. Is not orgasm inducing. It is the pain pleasure mix that thrives them. I don't want to become a sex ed educator.

I mean this thread is also proof. That is a video example. Not very well produced or a sociological study but definitely based on reality.
Click to expand...
It's just that Joey Salads is a known fraud. He hires actors.
 
Aintitcool said:
To me a woman's nipple is a sexual organ.
Click to expand...
I'm sorry, I don't want to sound rude, but this is not up to debate and personal opinion.

A sex organ (or reproductive organ) is any part of an animal's body that is involved in sexual reproduction. The reproductive organs together constitute the reproductive system. The testis in the male, and the ovary in the female, are called the primary sex organs.[1] The external sex organs – the genitals or genitalia, visible at birth in both sexes, and the internal sex organs are called the secondary sex organs.[1]
Click to expand...
 
Fuz said:
I'm sorry, I don't want to sound rude, but this is not up to debate and personal opinion.
Click to expand...
Womens nipples are directly connected to their sexual organs. The nerve endings meetup. The production of milk are the later stages of reproduction as an unfed child will die. Biologist categorize breast with sexual organs. "
BreastExternalProduce and deliver milk
"
https://opentextbc.ca/biology/chapter/24-3-human-reproductive-anatomy-and-gametogenesis/

So unless you're a biologist with a different school of thought. You can't claim it as fact.
 
Last edited:
What seems crazy to me is people hiding the real intention behind all this. People can't be this naive.

All these things (like breastfeeding live) are tactics for views. There is absolutely no need to do it live, same as every other tactic these girls exploit in order to get losers to subscribe and donate. It's like these cosplays that look nothing like the character but show 95% of boobs (looking at you nigri), it's plain stupid to think that this is done for anything else than money.

So yeah, talk about this subject but let's not act like they are talking with the moral high-ground as they are using every tactic for personal gain.
 
Guynamedbilly said:
No matter what the subject you're talking about is, the answer to that question is always yes.
Click to expand...

Rule 34 exists for a reason.

Also, I don't have a problem with them streaming breastfeeding, but I'm not sure this is the audience for it. You're just going to get snarky replies and comments regardless. I'm not female, so it's not my place to say what it is and isn't allowed to be on Stream, but I think Twitch taking it down was silly.

Don't they have a NSFW filter anyway?
 
Fuz said:
Sexual organs are reproductive organs only. But you can keep being wrong, I don't care.
Click to expand...
Feeding the born children is not part of reproduction? Either way doctors differ on the opinion. But the psychological impact is very real from nipples being connected directly to cliteral arrasousal. https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/the-human-beast/201305/sexual-wiring-womens-breasts

All three of these maps also receive input when the nipple is stimulated. From a functional perspective, this means that the breast doubles as a truly sexual organ. It is not just an exciting visual stimulus for (most) men but also a key source of sexual pleasure for most women. As to the wiring of men's nipples the jury is out. Some men's nipples are also responsive to sexual stimulation but the brain response has yet to be mapped.
Click to expand...

PS:The other link was british based biological anatomy descriptions.
 
Last edited:
I´d never dare to tell a woman where, how, and under what conditions to feed her baby. Well, maybe if she was doing it at the edge of a bridge or something, but internet´s snowflakes feelings should not be of her concern.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Is the Marvel Rivals honeymoon over? OW2 ties it for viewers on Twitch
2
67
4K
MayauMiao replied
5h45m of Silent Hill 2 Remake Pc version played by a Spanish streamer on Twitch.
Spoilers  2 3
121
10K
luca_29_bg replied
The 22-year debate over the PlayStation mascot is finally over
Platform  2 3
111
8K
PSYGN replied
Nintendo is suing Switch Leaker streamer for $7.5m
News  2
58
3K
rodrigolfp replied
PSN Accounts should allow for save spaces for up to four additional players
Social Opinion Drama 
32
2K
Bojji replied
Top Bottom