So I guess this is the right place to ask this.
I recently picked up myself a turntable and set up a station in my home office.
Now I'm really loving it, and have found a bunch of great used records at local stores, mostly soul and funk from the 70s that sound great and are just a delight to listen to. Some of it is quite hard to find in any other form, and the novelty of records is just too much fun.
I also have a couple of brand new records - repressings/re-releases, such as James Brown's "Live at the Apollo" that I recently found after much searching, but I don't really understand why people buy a lot of new albums in record form.
Generally, record lovers argue for the superiority of vinyl because it is the purest form of listening to a recording, as it is pressed in analog and no information can be digitally lost, no matter how unnoticeable.
But music today is recorded digitally and mastered digitally. So whereas with old music, you're taking analog recordings and digitizing them, so they are debatably inferior on CD, or at the very least they lose something intangible, nowadays you are taking a digital recording and converting it to analog, making whatever advantage there was void. Am I missing something here, or are new records of new releases purchased just for the novelty of it?
I understand a handful of artists, like Sharon Jones, still use analog equipment to make their recordings, but I didn't think most did?