Support NeoGAF

[Scrawnton]

Would you rather have free games for life but every time you start a new game for the first time, you are forced to read the entire terms of service before playing it, or every game cost $100 per game (including smaller indie games).

 

[Buggy Loop]

Neither

I start going over my steam backlog and game until my death without spending a dime

 

[Zacfoldor]

 

[R3TRO]

How much for the audiobook DLC...

 

[Plies]

 

[Cert.in.Death]

I already do read the ToS on most games. I really should try and get paid for it.

 

[Dacvak]

Man, this poll isn't event about agreeing to the sketchy TOS jargon, it's just about reading it.

OP is asking us if we'd read ~4000 words to save $100.

Yes. Yes, all of us sane, literate people would take the 10-15 minutes to read a TOS if it meant the game was free.

I already do read the ToS on most games. I really should try and get paid for it.

That being said, whoever is already reading the TOS in full is fuckin nuts

 

[Topher]

Will there be a test?

 

[poodaddy]

Who in the fuck would rather pay a hundred bucks than read a document?

Serious question for those who would rather pay than read, and I'm not picking on you guys, just honestly curious: Do you find reading difficult or have some type of learning disability?

 

[Shifty1897]

I won't even pay $80 for a game, and can count the number of times I've spent $70 on one hand, I ain't paying $100. I'll read the EULA.

 

[Pimpbaa]

I won't even pay $80 for a game, and can count the number of times I've spent $70 on one hand, I ain't paying $100. I'll read the EULA.

Same. Most 70 dollar games I wait for sales.

 

[bighugeguns]

Would you rather have free games for life but every time you start a new game for the first time, you are forced to read the entire terms of service before playing it, or every game cost $100 per game (including smaller indie games).

Hate to be cynical but thanks to rapidly increasing automation I think we're squarely in the twilight years of even charging money upfront for games.

The value will shift to commercial curators where you pay them for recommendations, finding what you like in the flood instead.

Companies who stubbornly operate on legacy models consisting of legal TOS fuckery, intellectual property and upfront sales will basically vanish.

 

[ssringo]

I'm not sure I'd be willing to pay $100 for every game even if I was rich enough that it wouldn't affect me...

 

[Killjoy-NL]

We already have f2p games.

 

[Robb]

Getting more informed about how companies are screwing me and getting to screw them right back by receiving their product for free sounds like a win/win to me.

 

[Sebastian1295]

If you work for a living then you're already doing a mundane task that you don't wanna do anyway just to get money. So why wouldn't you be willing to do a mundane and tedious task to get something for free that you want 'games'.

 

[Avid Reading Horse]

Me when the TOS pops up:

I'll cough up the hundo, sorry brokies.

 

[NeoIkaruGAF]

Yes. Yes, all of us sane, literate people would take the 10-15 minutes to read a TOS if it meant the game was free.

Who in the fuck would rather pay a hundred bucks than read a document?

GAF really is a bubble.
You'd be surprised at the numbers if OP's hypothetical actually came into action.
It's the same reason digital has won over physical. Every little second counts, every little contraction of one's muscles must be avoided if at all possible.

 

[IAmRei]

how did they know if we are reading it or not? i could just scroll it away like bamco games?

 

[ReBurn]

Who in the fuck would rather pay a hundred bucks than read a document?

Serious question for those who would rather pay than read, and I'm not picking on you guys, just honestly curious: Do you find reading difficult or have some type of learning disability?

Depends on how much value you place on your time. If the document is long enough I would probably opt to pay the money to get straight to what I actually want to be doing.

 

[Danny22]

I wish the second option on Americans

 

[kat_on_the_roof]

I value time more than money.
I'd rather spend more money (which I don't have ) than spend three hours clicking through the terms of service.

 

[DelireMan7]

It's the same reason digital has won over physical. Every little second counts, every little contraction of one's muscles must be avoided if at all possible.

It always makes me laugh when one of the pro for digital is "I can switch between games without moving and no time loss".

 

[PeteBull]

Would you rather have free games for life but every time you start a new game for the first time, you are forced to read the entire terms of service before playing it, or every game cost $100 per game (including smaller indie games).

EZ first choice, most of us cant make 100$ in few minutes needed to read terms of service, hell most of us dont make it in an hour even ;D

 

[poodaddy]

Depends on how much value you place on your time. If the document is long enough I would probably opt to pay the money to get straight to what I actually want to be doing.

There's absolutely nothing I value more than my time outside of my family, but I still would absolutely never, under any circumstances pay money to avoid reading. I just find it interesting is all, thanks for the response man.

 

[poodaddy]

Me when the TOS pops up:

I'll cough up the hundo, sorry brokies.

Are they brokies, or simply more intelligent/less intellectually lazy than you?

 

[Avid Reading Horse]

Are they brokies, or simply more intelligent/less intellectually lazy than you?

Some real brokie talk right here.

 

[poodaddy]

Some real brokie talk right here.

More intelligent it is then, I see.

Be careful to avoid deep puddles today brother, we call those pools ok?

 

[vaibhavpisal]

I already read all my terms and conditions. Sometimes I have to scroll all the way down.

 

[cinnamonandgravy]

i hate when you have to control to the bottom to enable the OK button

 

[Arsic]

 

[Magic Carpet]

I would rather be stitched mouth to butt to the previous poster than read a TOS.

 

[SomeNorseGuy]

Neither!

 

[SEGAvangelist]

Will there be a test?

 

[Grildon Tundy]

Have you ever read TOS? It's crazy what they claim you're agreeing to. It reminds me of The Simpsons episode with Bart punching the air and moving towards Lisa, saying he's just punching air, to resolve himself of all fault for hitting her.

 

[yurinka]

None of them

 

[Uncle Moe]

Choice is too easy as presented. OP isn't even asking for comprehension, just moving one's eyes over the words. Make it rather a choice between paying full freight for a game, no ToS obligation, or receiving a discount of say 15-percent in return for stuyding that sweet, sweet legalese.

 

[Closer]

I can fake reading and can fake money. One of those have huge consequences.