Style Advice GAF: Is this suit doing too much?

Status
Not open for further replies.
The suit is not where you do something different; the whole point is to appear professional and yeah, a little conformist. If you want to personalize, go for an unusual shirt and/or tie.
 
That suit is terrible, a very generic cut (based on an off-the-peg corporate suit judging from the second ticket pocket, ugh) that they try liven up by using a gimmicky patterned cloth.

If you want to be non-conformist or different, think shape, not pattern. Choose something with unique proportions or differently shaped lapels or, better yet, be bold with your shirt choice or your shoes rather than your outer layer.
 
Anyone else besides me comfortable with suits from Dillards, Belk, or Macys? I have a very nice suit that cost me maybe 300 dollars. I've never seen the appeal of a $3,000 suit.

C'MON!
I have a suit that cost 100.i also have one that was about 700.diffent strokes man
 
eSSH8GJ.png
 
I think you'd have to be pretty flamboyant/have a big personality to pull it off. I don't love the lightning bolts, personally.

Gotta love the people telling you to get a "regular" suit as if that's at all what you're looking for.
 
Quick answer: no. I cannot think of a situation where this suit would be a good idea.

I was thinking you might be able to get away with it if you work in marketing/social media/tech. But then I thought you don't even need a suit for these types of workplaces in the first place except if you're client facing or giving a presentation to investors/C-suite or something. Then the suit becomes unacceptable again.

If you insist on a pattern, try to look for something subtle or try working with a more traditional suit and get creative with your shirt/tie combos (e.g., a white shirt with a grey check pattern and a blue tie with purple accenting).
 
This suit is horrible and almost nobody can pull it off. You might be one of the rare people who can pull this suit off, but that's probably pretty unlikely.

Further, are you prepared to wear this suit once and then never again, because if you ever wear it again and even if you look good, someone will say "Oh, Bam Bam baklava is in his lightning bolt suit again."

So is there anything I post you guys will actually like or what? It's like even the smallest deviation from strict conformity gets backlash.

The whole concept of the suit is conformity. You can challenge conformity with a suit with a few things, ties, pocket squares, socks, and/or shoes, and that's why those things work. A very traditional navy suit with a blaze of yellow on the shoes, or a traditional suit with a bow tie that has a striking pattern, traditional suit with a striking colored tie and then a unique sock pattern that matches the tie, etc.

This suit is basically one step below the Tuxedo t-shirt, I say one step below because this suit probably costs hundreds more than a $5 tuxedo t-shirt. If I saw someone wearing this suit either at a party, work event, wedding, or anywhere, I'd think "they think they're cool and they don't take themselves seriously, but they also waste money on a ridiculous suit that you can never wear."
 
Quick answer: no. I cannot think of a situation where this suit would be a good idea.

I was thinking you might be able to get away with it if you work in marketing/social media/tech. But then I thought you don't even need a suit for these types of workplaces in the first place except if you're client facing or giving a presentation to investors/C-suite or something. Then the suit becomes unacceptable again.
well, you can wear suits outside of work :P
 
Don't listen to all of these sheeps. You can never be ahead of everyone if you just follow everyone.

Follow your hunch and get it.

Let the winning team know when you are wearing it.

#WIN
#AWESOMEFASHION
#NOTASHEEPUNLIKETHERESTOFGAF
 
You're supposed to show that you're mature, confident, and willing to conform to the workplace when you wear a suit. Its the symbol of professionalism. This suit you're proposing is just wrong on every level.
 
You're supposed to show that you're mature, confident, and willing to conform to the workplace when you wear a suit. Its the symbol of professionalism. This suit you're proposing is just wrong on every level.
i feel legit sad for anyone who doesn't wear a suit for fun anymore :(
 
The suit executes the idea of a fun pattern very poorly. The cut and the colour is too formal for something like this. I bet you could find something infinitely more interesting at Topman or Zara... even H&M. No point in spending a lot for something you'll get bored of.
 
I'd like some serious input here because it's on my wishlist right now. I'm looking for something different something to wear when I don't feel like wearing a more traditional looking suit. However, am I going too far with the print and taking a big risk?

Go for it.

My only issue is that the jacket looks a little on the short side.

Also re James Bond, outside of Connery, none of the other Bonds have good suits; they in fact have dated garbage, and this especially applies to Craig.
 
I'd like some serious input here because it's on my wishlist right now. I'm looking for something different something to wear when I don't feel like wearing a more traditional looking suit. However, am I going too far with the print and taking a big risk?

It honestly depends on what kind of thing you're going to wear it to. If it has anything to do with a professional setting, then no, I would say that lightning bolts are not appropriate.

Edit: If you're just wanting something fun to wear instead of the regular suit and you're not wearing it to a professional setting, then go for it. It's not to my tastes, but if you like it, why not?
 
Terrible suit, terrible cut thus almost definately a terrible fit.

Don't waste your money on this garbage. Spend your money on a proper suit.
 
Go for it.

My only issue is that the jacket looks a little on the short side.

Also re James Bond, outside of Connery, none of the other Bonds have good suits; they in fact have dated garbage, and this especially applies to Craig.
well it's being modeled on a dude who is likely 6'2" and a 46. neil's blazers are a little on the short side on me but not nearly that abbreviated.
 
I'm more concerned about the apparent the lack of socks in that picture. At the very least the model should have matching lighting bolt dress socks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom