There is only Tingle.
The only other Zelda character who deserves to be in Smash Bros.!There is only Tingle.
Slime for SSB6.Assuming Snake and Pac-Man are the final guest characters, I wonder if Square Enix feels offended that they're the only "big five" Japanese publisher without a character in Smash Bros.
Hey, for all we know, Square-Enix might have a character planned for the game. They've supported the 3DS and WiiU about as much as Capcom, which is to say, quite a bit of support for 3DS, and not so much for WiiU. They also have characters that have their share of history, like Mega Man does. I could see SE getting a character. It's not for us to say what constitutes "too many third-party characters" -- only Sakurai.Assuming Snake and Pac-Man are the final guest characters, I wonder if Square Enix feels offended that they're the only "big five" Japanese publisher without a character in Smash Bros.
Assuming Snake and Pac-Man are the final guest characters, I wonder if Square Enix feels offended that they're the only "big five" Japanese publisher without a character in Smash Bros.
Class system character.
Dooo eeeeeet
No one is worried that Sakurai may think four third parties is a crowd for Smash? We barely got Sonic in Brawl.
Holy shit, come up with a name for this character idea and I'm all for it.Class system character.
Dooo eeeeeet
Or the event match against third-party characters could simply spawn new characters as you defeat other ones. For example, you start against Sonic and Snake, defeat them, and then Pac-Man and Mega Man take their place.Megaman, Sonic, and Pac-Man [it's like 99% confirmed, Namco's in on this!] are enough to dedicate an Event Match to 3rd-party characters. Throwing more in would make that impossible unless the match had more player slots like the Polygon/Wireframe/Alloy matches.
god those events in Melee/Brawl were tough
I'd much prefer to have a few more 3rd-party characters though.
This is mostly how I feel.Zelda's my favorite series, but I feel it doesn't need anyone else. There hasn't really been any new stand out recurring characters that I personally would want. As long as we have Link, Zelda, and Ganondorf I'm good. Impa is recurring, but personally I just don't care about her.
Heh, the way I see it for tingle is that he is just a bizarre weird dude with weird history and weird items in his arsenal that could be used to create an original/different fighter than the rest of the roster. Impa would just be a Shiek, and Ghirahim (one of the most black/white/anime cliche characters in game history) is just another dude with a sword. Though he could teleport, which I guess is cool.. but not cool enough.
JUST LOOK AT THOSE ROSEY FUCKING CHEEKS.
![]()
You could've said the same thing about Rosalina, though. She was playable in Mario Kart and as a hidden character in 3D World... but so was Toad, as a default character in all of those games and more. And Toad looks more unique next to the other Mario characters than Rosalina does next to Peach.This is mostly how I feel.
Impa is sort of like the Toad of the Zelda series, only much less prominent (she appears in fewer games and isn't playable in any of them). I really don't see why she'd ever be included. She's the NPC protector of the NPC damsel in distress. That's pretty far down the totem pole of character roles worth being playable in Smash Bros. And as unique as the time-based transformation idea is, Impa is not nearly important enough to receive that kind of attention as a two-in-one character. It just simply isn't a realistic expectation.
If we have to rack our brains to come up with a decent fifth Zelda character then I think we have to ask ourselves if a fifth Zelda character is worth including at all. The Mario series only had four characters in Brawl -- it actually lost a rep from Melee. Even though it's Nintendo's biggest series, Sakurai didn't shoehorn a newcomer in for the sake of it.
In the somewhat unlikely event that the Zelda series does get a newcomer, I really don't see how it could be anyone other than Toon Zelda and/or Tetra. She's the only Zelda character with a recurring focal role left (being the titular character and all), she was planned for Brawl, and she'd be relatively easy to include.
Having all of them on screen at the same time is the novelty though.Or the event match against third-party characters could simply spawn new characters as you defeat other ones. For example, you start against Sonic and Snake, defeat them, and then Pac-Man and Mega Man take their place.
Make it the warrior of light
Bam done.
NiiiiiiiiiceMake it the warrior of light
Bam done.
This is mostly how I feel.
Impa is sort of like the Toad of the Zelda series, only much less prominent (she appears in fewer games and isn't playable in any of them). I really don't see why she'd ever be included. She's the NPC protector of the NPC damsel in distress. That's pretty far down the totem pole of character roles worth being playable in Smash Bros. And as unique as the time-based transformation idea is, Impa is not nearly important enough to receive that kind of attention as a two-in-one character. It just simply isn't a realistic expectation.
If we have to rack our brains to come up with a decent fifth Zelda character then I think we have to ask ourselves if a fifth Zelda character is worth including at all. The Mario series only had four characters in Brawl -- it actually lost a rep from Melee. Even though it's Nintendo's biggest series, Sakurai didn't shoehorn a newcomer in for the sake of it.
In the somewhat unlikely event that the Zelda series does get a newcomer, I really don't see how it could be anyone other than Toon Zelda and/or Tetra. She's the only Zelda character with a recurring focal role left (being the titular character and all), she was planned for Brawl, and she'd be relatively easy to include.
Nope nope nope.I'm pretty sure Toad is in a worse position even if he is playable in some games, he is clearly a filler character because they had no one else to make playable. They chose Mario enemies like hot head and even made up new Mario characters before making him a partner in Paper Mario. People really hyperbole his popularity outside of cart games. He is generally the character people treat like crap in NSMB if they end up playing as him in a group.
I remember pre-Super Paper Mario, there were a bunch of people who honestly and adamantly believed the last playable character was Toad, any faith I had in the internet even if tiny, was all lost at that point.
Nope nope nope.
First off, even Nintendo has noted (in Iwata Asks, for example) that Toad is surprisingly popular, and so they think his inclusion in various games is justified.
Second, Paper Mario hardly proves anything. What you describe is more the consequence of Toads comprising the common NPCs of the game more than anything else.
I'm not arguing for his inclusion in Smash (although that could be arranged -- I know he's Peach's shield, but they could swap in Toadsworth instead), but I am saying he's more popular than you suggest.
I came up with an idea for a Tingle moveset that was based around the Rupee Land mechanics of hiring fighters that involved a rupee metre. Well seeing as Little Mac has a K.O. metre I guess my idea wasn't completely out of the realms of possibilities.Characters that aren't based around fighting is what I'm hoping to see more of in Smash Bros.. Tingle would be a perfect Zelda newcomer.
Yes, that was the design decision, but the popularity issue came up in a separate context. It's also worth noting Toad was playable as far back as Super Mario Bros. 2 (or SMB USA in Japan -- the Doki Doki reskin) on the NES/Famicon. Point is, he carries credentials well beyond Rosalina's limited run, and has a more distinct profile and appearance -- and yet Rosalina got in. Impa had a striking presence in Skyward Sword like Rosalina did in Galaxy 1, and along with her recurring role in the series and the potential for a unique gameplay model (time shift), or even something iterative (another ninja), she could very well work her way into Smash.Pretty sure that was not the main reason. After people questioned why they didn't use the Wario Bros. and used generic Toads, they said the Wario Bros. were not similar in shape to the Mario Bros so they went with Toads. I'm assuming to make that reason seem less like an excuse they added that Toad was "popular" when as far as I have seen it's not really the case outside of party games.
The Mario series only had four characters in Brawl
Yoshi and Wario represent their own franchises in Smash Bros., not the Mario series.Mario, Luigi, Bowser, Wario, Yoshi and Peach makes six
Mario, Luigi, Bowser, Wario, Yoshi and Peach makes six
Again, I'm not arguing -for- Toad, but I am saying the above is an invalid argument. Toad appears in another character's moveset? Swap in Toadsworth (which would make more sense for Peach, anyways, Toadsworth being THE royal attendant).Toad's problem is his genericness. There are many, many Toads out there. Toad isn't a single, stand out character. Well, unless you're specifically talking about Captain Toad, but he can do even less than a normal Toad. Yes, characters like Yoshi, Villager, and Pokémon characters got in despite their own genericness, but the difference there is that those characters are the star of their own franchise, or in Pokémon's case, pretty much all potential characters from the franchise are generic. Toad is not the star of his franchise, and there are many other non-generic Mario characters that can be chosen before him.
Waddle Dee is in the same boat as Toad here. They're both important to their franchises, yes, but they appear in Smash Bros. not as their own character, but through another character's move set (Peach, Kind Dedede).
Tingle can use one balloon vs Villager's two. Tots different.
Yes, that was the design decision, but the popularity issue came up in a separate context. It's also worth noting Toad was playable as far back as Super Mario Bros. 2 (or SMB USA in Japan -- the Doki Doki reskin) on the NES/Famicon. Point is, he carries credentials well beyond Rosalina's limited run, and has a more distinct profile and appearance -- and yet Rosalina got in. Impa had a striking presence in Skyward Sword like Rosalina did in Galaxy 1, and along with her recurring role in the series and the potential for a unique gameplay model (time shift), or even something iterative (another ninja), she could very well work her way into Smash.
I do think Toon Zelda is the safer guess, if there is to be another Zelda newcomer, but I don't Sakurai is one to always be so conservative.
The balloon could simply float upwards instead of doing the Kirby-esque bobbing that villager seems to have.Tingle can use one balloon vs Villager's two. Tots different.
You better mean Alfonso.Again, I'm not arguing -for- Toad, but I am saying the above is an invalid argument. Toad appears in another character's moveset? Swap in Toadsworth .