Is it bad that I legit can't tell if that's Sanders or Larry David?
Is it bad that I legit can't tell if that's Sanders or Larry David?
Polling had in as much as 30 points behind. Keeping it close is a moral win for him haha.
The victory window gets smaller and Smaller with each loss
Aha! Now the rubber band is on the other claw!
Well, the slightest mistake could elect him. Then what? Ooops, sorry! I'd rather we face off against Cruz, have a better chance at that. Kasich is the one we should worry about, but he has no chance.
Bern taking Michigan?
Is it bad that I legit can't tell if that's Sanders or Larry David?
Bern taking Michigan?
Won't matter to Sanders supporters. They'll see it as "we were winning, and it ended up being really close. Let's keep fighting."
Damn, Hillary's now tied Michigan and Wayne County (Detroit) hasn't even come in yet. Neither has Grand Rapids and other urban areas for the most part.
And Mississippi... Bernie getting only 11%. Is there a threshold there? is it possible that Bernie comes out of Mississippi with 0 delegates? It happened to Hillary in Vermont.
My point is people were saying Iowa was a tie.
Still early, from what I hear most of the counties that favour Hillary haven't been called yet?
GAAAAAAAF, please tell me Roboto is getting switched off tonight!
My point is people were saying Iowa was a tie.
Nope. But it is ultimately gonna be closer than (most) polling!
A Cruz presidency would be a lot more dangerous than a Trump presidency, IMO.
I was more talking about Kasich being hot and Rubio being cold going into a contested convention and why Rubio hanging around is pointless.
You seem pretty certain of this, even in the face of a growing Bern lead. Why is that?
Won't matter to Sanders supporters. They'll see it as "we were winning, and it ended up being really close. Let's keep fighting."
I didn't mean to quote you
You seem pretty certain of this, even in the face of a growing Bern lead. Why is that?
You seem pretty certain of this, even in the face of a growing Bern lead. Why is that?
Well, the slightest mistake could elect him. Then what? Ooops, sorry! I'd rather we face off against Cruz, have a better chance at that. Kasich is the one we should worry about, but he has no chance.
Mississippi not berning.
Because areas that heavily favor Hillary haven't been counted yet, and a lot of Bernie areas have been.You seem pretty certain of this, even in the face of a growing Bern lead. Why is that?
A Cruz presidency would be a lot more dangerous than a Trump presidency, IMO.
Pick your poison. You both lose with either of them. Poison or shot in the gut?
Doesn't matter. Cruz is hated with a lot of people and doesn't have the celebrity appeal that Trump does.
where did it all go wrong for Rubio
NYTimes shows where the votes are coming from. The major parts of the vote are in areas that you'd expect Clinton have a big lead in.
Approximately zero precincts in Detroit or Flint have reported, and absentees aren't getting reported until basically everything else has (and Clinton had a huge lead in those).
(And his lead's been shrinking in spite of that - it was as high as ~4500 earlier and is now ~1100.)
Because how none of Flint is in and less than 10 precincts in the county where Detroit resides are in.
So looking like MI on the Dem side won't be called when polls close?
But I think there's a non-zero chance that a Trump Presidency could lead to World War Three or the nuclear apocalypse.
Idaho about to be called??
Cruz is certainly more right wing than Trump.
But I think there's a non-zero chance that a Trump Presidency could lead to World War Three or the nuclear apocalypse.
lol at this TYT stream.
It's like they are just finding out about the concept of confirmation bias.
:O :O :O
This is why we listen to data, people, and not "soooo many articles coming out about thiiiissss! Media bias!"