speculawyer
Member
Posting a picture of the kid will ruin the thread.
He plays the stereotype doesn't he?
I think he's wearing a customized version this shirt:
Posting a picture of the kid will ruin the thread.
True American Hero Davy Crockett.
http://www.charlescomm.com/clients/images/large/davy_crockett_image.gif[IMG][/QUOTE]
Bravo! I laughed way too hard at that.
This is the first thing you learn in any high school journalism class. A student's First Amendment rights are basically surrendered by your parents to the school administrators while you are on campus.
You know what else was weird about that kid? One time, in physics class, we were forced to work on something in groups, and me and Bryce were in the same group. We needed to measure the distance between two objects on a table but we didn't have a ruler. So one of us volunteers to go and look for one, and Bryce says, "Wait." And he stretched out his thumb and forefinger in a practiced way and measured the distance using his hand. He proudly exclaimed, "It's exactly 5 inches." I say, "How do you know that?" Suddenly, Bryce became very nervous and left the room. Weird dude.
Since when do teachers get to dictate clothing policy's? .
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District (1969)
Issue: Freedom of Speech at School
Bottom Line: You Have the Right To Express YourselfUp to a Point
Background
In December 1965, John and Mary Beth Tinker and their friend Chris Eckhardt wore black armbands to school in Des Moines, Iowa, to protest the war in Vietnam. School officials told them to remove the armbands, and when they refused, they were suspended (John, 15, from North High; Mary Beth, 13, from Warren Harding Junior High; and Chris, 16, from Roosevelt High). With their parents, they sued the school district, claiming a violation of their First Amendment right of freedom of speech.
Ruling
The Supreme Court sided with the students. Students and teachers don't "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate," the Court said.
The Court did not, however, grant students an unlimited right to self-expression. It said First Amendment guarantees must be balanced against a school's need to keep order: As long as an act of expression doesn't disrupt classwork or school activities or invade the rights of others, it's acceptable. Regarding the students in this case, "their deviation consisted only in wearing on their sleeve a band of black cloth," the Court said. "They caused discussion outside of the classrooms, but no interference with work and no disorder."
Impact
In 1986, applying the "disruption test" from the Tinker case, the Supreme Court upheld the suspension of Matthew Fraser, a 17-year-old senior at Bethel High School in Tacoma, Washington, who gave a school speech containing sexual innuendos (Bethel School District v. Fraser). The Court said "it is a highly appropriate function of public school education to prohibit the use of vulgar and offensive terms in public discourse."
Lower courts have relied on Tinker in rulings on school attire, allowing nose rings and dyed hair, for example, but disallowing a T-shirt displaying a Confederate flag.
It's sad that the police even needed to get involved with this. Gotta get those kids into the system early I guess.
This is probably not the first time this kid will be involved with police.
Its been confirmed in other stories that the school dress code did not forbid the shirt. The Kid wore it for more than half the day until a specific teacher took offense.
The teacher claimed he was inciting a riot because as he was being taken away the kids were cheering him on.
Its a case of a bullshit teacher causing trouble and the kid taking the fall
This is the dumbest thing I have ever heard. Because he wore a shirt with a gun on it, he is now an automatic future criminal?
No, because he's the type to deliberately provoke authority into action and thus "prove a point." If you'd read the article you'd have seen that.
No, because he's the type to deliberately provoke authority into action and thus "prove a point." If you'd read the article you'd have seen that.
I'm sure it won't be unfortunately.This is probably not the first time this kid will be involved with police.
Logan City Police Chief E.K. Harper told ABCNews.com that Marcum was not arrested for wearing a t-shirt, but for "disrupting the school process."
Kids asked to turn their shirts inside-out or wear a school provided shirt every day for a multitude of reasons and have been for at least 60 years in the US, this kid is a douche.
Students are prohibited from wearing shirts/blouses that:
Depict or reference alcohol, drugs, tobacco, weapons, nudity, gang
affiliation, death, violence, vulgar or obscene language or images,
and/orinsultsto race,religion, gender, or ethnicity, or other emblems
or writing that may be expected to cause a material or substantial
disruption of, or interference with, normal school operations.
Hard to know exactly what happened but I don't see why they are complaining about a T-shirt.
Kids asked to turn their shirts inside-out or wear a school provided shirt every day for a multitude of reasons and have been for at least 60 years in the US, this kid is a douche.
The student wore the shirt uninterrupted for more than 4 hours through multiple classes and multiple teachers. The shirt was found to not be in violation of the dress code. The incident was provoked by a biased teacher during lunch hour.
The shirt is so ok when he came back after his 1 day vacation he wore the shirt again as did tons of other students without incident.
Where did you guys go to school? My very conservative Texas school district had a dress code that would have banned this kid's NRA shirt.
While I'm not a fan of the ultra-broad interpretation of the 2nd Amendment, I think it's hilarious how the 1st Amendment stops at the school doors.
Schools never claimed to be a democracy. Theyre more like a business, or a daycare, and the students follow company policy.While I'm not a fan of the ultra-broad interpretation of the 2nd Amendment, I think it's hilarious how the 1st Amendment stops at the school doors.
"He had yellow eyes I tell you... Yellow eyes!!"
Obviously the teacher needs a t-shirt with a picture of a gun on it to protect himself from the kids t-shirt with a picture of a gun on it.
Schools never claimed to be a democracy. Theyre more like a business, or a daycare, and the students follow company policy.
While I'm not a fan of the ultra-broad interpretation of the 2nd Amendment, I think it's hilarious how the 1st Amendment stops at the school doors.
The New York Times said:In June, the Supreme Court weighed in on another student expression case, Frederick v. Morse, ruling that schools can limit student speech that seems to advocate illegal drug use. The case concerned Joseph Frederick, an 18-year-old senior at Juneau-Douglas High School in Alaska, who was suspended in 2002 for holding a banner that said "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" while standing across the street from the school during the Olympic torch relay.
Pretty sure government institutions also have dress codes. And theres always home schooling if you dont like it.With the small difference of not having any choice in the matter. And being a government institution.
Pretty sure government institutions also have dress codes. And theres always home schooling if you dont like it.
you killed him because he wouldn't let you see his Halo novel?
Schools never claimed to be a democracy. Theyre more like a business, or a daycare, and the students follow company policy.
Company policy is to now have prayer before class begins.
School isn't the place to be making political statements or endorsing religion. Its been established that students rights are not protected by the constitution while on school grounds. Their lockers and backpacks can be searched at will and their speech is not unrestricted.
What the fuck is on that kids head?