• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Ten years since 'Dredd', where's our sequel?

cormack12

cormack12

Gold Member
Where's our sequel?

BlankMediumKakapo-size_restricted.gif


AlTA.gif



p9128607_p_v8_ac.jpg
 
Laptop1991

Laptop1991

Member
I really enjoyed this film and i didn't see it until i bought the Blu ray, a sequel would be good as long as the writing is as good.
 
pramod

pramod

Banned
I thought it was as perfect a movie you can make if the movie was just " a typical day in the life of Judge Dredd". It doesnt waste time explaining things and It just throws you right in and like a comic book everything is done visually. Like the slo-mo drug theres no explanation for what its effects are you just see it.

A sequel would be cool but i dunno how you can top the perfect pacing and mood of the first one.
 
Last edited:
Mohonky

Mohonky

Member
This movie came out of nowhere for me. Expected it to be corny trash, but it turned out to be awesome. Had a visual level of violence that reminded me of the original Robocop movies.

Actually enjoyed it alot
 
BadBurger

BadBurger

Many “Whelps”! Handle It!
They way I look at it, at least the character got one quality film. Leaving such a cult classic character with their only movie being that balled-up turd from Stallone would have sucked.
 
sol_bad

sol_bad

Member
We ain't getting it son, no one cared about it or watched it. Which piiiiiiiisses me oooooooooff!!!!!!!
 
Ammogeddon

Ammogeddon

Member
Great movie, can’t believe it’s been 10 years already. It really was underrated and deserved to have done better at the box office.

As others have said there was supposed to be a TV series in the works but who knows if that ever sees the light of day.
 
Ionian

Ionian

Member
As a previous collector of 2000 AD,

I thought the film was brilliant, Stallone one he takes off his helmet. (For anyone that never read the comics, he never does).
 
DGrayson

DGrayson

Mod Team and Bat Team
Staff Member
Not everything needs a sequel. I understand where you are coming from. I loved part 1. But hopefully the minds behind that make something awesome a new.
 
RJMacready73

RJMacready73

Banned
DGrayson said:
Not everything needs a sequel. I understand where you are coming from. I loved part 1. But hopefully the minds behind that make something awesome a new.
Click to expand...
how very dare you! the only film deserving of a sequel is Dredd ffs, the world that its set in is absolutely rife with lore and incredible stories, breaks my heart that we never got one to what is possibly one of the best modern proper action scifi flicks since the 00's
 
L

Lasha

Member
Dredd did like 40 million at the box office. Disney shat out ant man to the tune of 500 million box office. That's why we doing have a sequel. Audiences want MCU.
 
DGrayson

DGrayson

Mod Team and Bat Team
Staff Member
RJMacready73 said:
how very dare you! the only film deserving of a sequel is Dredd ffs, the world that its set in is absolutely rife with lore and incredible stories, breaks my heart that we never got one to what is possibly one of the best modern proper action scifi flicks since the 00's
Click to expand...

I loved this movie!! I would love a proper sequel, and NOT a low budget TV show.
 
Madflavor

Madflavor

Member
Didn't make enough money. In this day and age it's a miracle in itself to even get a film like this in the first place, so sometimes we just gotta be happy with what we got. I agree though that it's a shame we didn't get a sequel.
 
SafeOrAlone

SafeOrAlone

Banned
I like this movie but I don't think Karl Urban is the ultimate Dredd like a lot of other people seem to. Maybe it's just the direction but his constant "pouty face" made it hard for me to take him seriously. I know he's drawn that way, but c'mon.

I do want to see a sequel though. Even by a new director. I just think the Dredd world is really cool.
 
SafeOrAlone

SafeOrAlone

Banned
poodaddy said:
You don't like that he portrayed the character faithfully?
Click to expand...
Nope. What works on the comic page doesn't always convey the same effect on film.

Draw Wolverine in yellow spandex and he looks absolutely badass. Put Hugh Jackman in yellow spandex and it's going to look dumb.
 
Last edited:
poodaddy

poodaddy

Member
SafeOrAlone said:
Nope. What works on the comic page doesn't always convey the same effect on film.

Draw Wolverine in yellow spandex and he looks absolutely badass. Put Hugh Jackman in yellow spandex and it's going to look dumb.
Click to expand...
Hmm, alright fair enough. Can't say I agree, at all in any capacity, but I get what you're saying. I personally think that the success of the Avengers flicks has proven that they could have gone with a much more comic faithful look than the edgelord black leather they went with and they still could have found box office success. I understand that sounds odd, but I do honestly believe that the Wolverine could have looked rad with the right comic costume if the costume was made correctly. Obviously not spandex, but perhaps a more utilitarian kind of material and look, somewhat like the new Batman flick's look, with the comic colors and patterns definitely could have worked, or at least that's my opinion.

In general, I prefer when the comic adaptations veer more on the side of faithful then not, but I can see why a lot of people disagree and that's fine.
 
Javthusiast

Javthusiast

Banned
Netflix could easily fund a sequel that would cost less than 100 million, but nah they gotta spend 400 million on Red Notice and Grey Man and 500 million on Rian Johnson.
 
SafeOrAlone

SafeOrAlone

Banned
poodaddy said:
Hmm, alright fair enough. Can't say I agree, at all in any capacity, but I get what you're saying. I personally think that the success of the Avengers flicks has proven that they could have gone with a much more comic faithful look than the edgelord black leather they went with and they still could have found box office success. I understand that sounds odd, but I do honestly believe that the Wolverine could have looked rad with the right comic costume if the costume was made correctly. Obviously not spandex, but perhaps a more utilitarian kind of material and look, somewhat like the new Batman flick's look, with the comic colors and patterns definitely could have worked, or at least that's my opinion.

In general, I prefer when the comic adaptations veer more on the side of faithful then not, but I can see why a lot of people disagree and that's fine.
Click to expand...

I believe it’s all in the execution and it’s all subjective. I just couldn’t snap myself out of focusing on his pouty face. In my mind, he didn’t need to do that to convey that the character is a hardass. But that’s just my opinion, obviously.

I agree completely about Wolverine’s costume. I want to see something more faithful and I think there is a way it can be done…but it’s hard for me to imagine it.

It’s harder to justify in live action. Like okay, he is hiding his identity, but why the pointy ears?
Again, I think it can be done, but I’m fresh out of ideas on how. Maybe the militaristic thing like you mentioned but idk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

You got 10 sequel points to give sequels to 10 movies that you wish would've gotten sequels.
37
1K
bitbydeath replied
The Batman Part 2 Delayed a Year to 2027
2
62
2K
FunkMiller replied
Jon Watts Reveals He Cancelled Wolfs Sequel: "I No Longer Trust Apple as a Creative Partner"
22
1K
K' Dash replied
The Simpsons Hit & Run could have gotten 3 sequels for no charge for the license but someone at Vivendi Games said no
6
643
Hrk69 replied
Rumour : Ready at dawn had plans for a The Order 1886 sequel pre Meta acquisition
2
71
3K
MayauMiao replied
Top Bottom