Yup, but Murray seems to blink first in key moments.
Djokovic winning 10 more slams ahahahahaha. He won only 1 this year, when he's supposed to be in his prime.
A lot.anus hurts?
He'd need 10 more slams at least plus win French Open first (tho if he can do it while still in the Nadal era he'll certainly be something special)
Not even Federer in his prime could beat Nadal in the French. Yeah it would be impressive if the Djoker could accomplish that. I think his performance against Nadal in this years french was more impressive than any time Fed has showed up for a slaughtering at the hands of Nadal in Roland Garros.
Enjoy
London Finale 2012 Final Hot Shot Top 10 Countdown
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=239M9wDg80M&feature=g-u-u
see you next year guys.
Enjoy
London Finale 2012 Final Hot Shot Top 10 Countdown
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=239M9wDg80M&feature=g-u-u
Enjoy
London Finale 2012 Final Hot Shot Top 10 Countdown
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=239M9wDg80M&feature=g-u-u
USA TodayTraditionally, the bench to the left of the chair umpire is reserved for the higher-ranked player in a tennis match. In the case of the year-end match at the ATP World Tour Finals between Novak Djokovic and Roger Federer, the honor should have gone to Djokovic, the world No. 1.
But Federer entered the O2 Arena first for Monday's final and took the chair for himself. It's a familiar seat -- no man in history has spent more weeks at No. 1 than Federer -- but one that wasn't supposed to be his on Monday evening.
As noted by a number of tennis observers on Twitter, Djokovic appeared to notice the faux pas when he entered and seemed annoyed. He went on to lose the first nine points of the match en route to a quick 0-3 deficit. That's not saying there's any causation, mind you. Yet players, even ones with as much talent as Djokovic, have been thrown off by less.
He would rally to win the first set, 7-6.
Did Federer sit in the seat on purpose, to send a message? Was it a mistake? Does Federer always assume he's the top-ranked player in the room? I bet if Federer met the president and someone in the room said, "Mr. President, there's an urgent call for you," Federer would dig his phone out of his pocket to see who was ringing him.
It was probably a harmless accident or maybe they broke with tradition on purpose and we're all reading too much into Djokovic's reaction. For what it's worth, Federer and Djokovic both sat in the proper seats during Sunday's semifinal wins.
So, yeah, Fed is a very classless individual. He did something very unsportsmanlike (and juvenile) that went largely unnoticed by many people. But some caught it:
USA Today
Watch the replay on ESPN3. When entering the arena, Federer stops at the bench that has Novak's towel draped across it. His name is printed on the towel so there's no missing it. When Novak enters, his towel has magically moved to the other bench.
I always knew Fed was an asshole. Seriously....who does shit like that?
I. Think you are reading too much into things brah.So, yeah, Fed is a very classless individual. He did something very unsportsmanlike (and juvenile) that went largely unnoticed by many people. But some caught it:
USA Today
Watch the replay on ESPN3. When entering the arena, Federer stops at the bench that has Novak's towel draped across it. His name is printed on the towel so there's no missing it. When Novak enters, his towel has magically moved to the other bench.
I always knew Fed was an asshole. Seriously....who does shit like that?
So, yeah, Fed is a very classless individual. He did something very unsportsmanlike (and juvenile) that went largely unnoticed by many people. But some caught it:
USA Today
Watch the replay on ESPN3. When entering the arena, Federer stops at the bench that has Novak's towel draped across it. His name is printed on the towel so there's no missing it. When Novak enters, his towel has magically moved to the other bench.
I always knew Fed was an asshole. Seriously....who does shit like that?
If you think that about Fed, then you must think Nadal is a huge asshole compared to Roger. Nadal is the king of gamesmenship. I've seen Nadal do things like this and worse (make his opponent wait 10+ minutes in the entrance just so Nadal can walk in last, refuse to get out of his chair first, intentionally bump his opponent when changing sides, etc...) so it is pretty hard to complain if Fed does something similar one time (which could have been completely accidental for all we know)
Guy is a two faced dick. always has been. Ego tripped freak that only cares for his records.
His ego (and a lot of his fans) put me off of him.So, yeah, Fed is a very classless individual. He did something very unsportsmanlike (and juvenile) that went largely unnoticed by many people. But some caught it:
USA Today
Watch the replay on ESPN3. When entering the arena, Federer stops at the bench that has Novak's towel draped across it. His name is printed on the towel so there's no missing it. When Novak enters, his towel has magically z moved to the other bench.
I always knew Fed was an asshole. Seriously....who does shit like that?
Worth watching
Novak Djokovic Victory Lap In London - Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZQlbmwbXb0&feature=g-u-u
Novak Djokovic Victory Lap In London - Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vb8vaQBq8-Q&feature=g-u-u
His ego (and a lot of his fans) put me off of him.
He just comes across as a smug self-loving arse a lot of the time.
Is there some sort of advantage reason for why the left seat is for the better player?
Indeed, but the media usually ignores this.His ego (and a lot of his fans) put me off of him.
He just comes across as a smug self-loving arse a lot of the time.
You guys are just full of it, do you know the guy personally? Haters gonna hate. What has the guy done to you? When has he ever done something distasteful? The chair thing is such BS, who gives a shit, we know that Fed doesnt like Djokovic (and I understand him).
Plenty of players can be dicks or make some comments from time to time but Fed is a perfect gentleman, unless he's that good of an actor. Troll harder Federer haters. But on that subject, on the court, Murray acts like a prick, Djoko too from time to time (remember his old days of faking injuries and whatnot), Fed at least contains himself.
And it's normal for the best player of history to have an ego, every fucking player has an ego, you guys have egos, that's how it works. He can afford that, and it's not like he insults players or whatever, and he always has a nice comment when he looses, apart from a couple of times where he appeared bitter, just like Other players, happens all the time.
Laughable coming from guys sitting in their fucking chairs in front of the computer. The day you have 17 Grand Slams, 76 titles, 2 Olympic Medals, have been number one for 302 weeks, you can open your mouth, and we'll see if you manage to stay firmly on the ground, which he manages to do.
You guys are just full of it, do you know the guy personally? Haters gonna hate. What has the guy done to you? When has he ever done something distasteful? The chair thing is such BS, who gives a shit, we know that Fed doesnt like Djokovic (and I understand him).
Plenty of players can be dicks or make some comments from time to time but Fed is a perfect gentleman, unless he's that good of an actor. Troll harder Federer haters. But on that subject, on the court, Murray acts like a prick, Djoko too from time to time (remember his old days of faking injuries and whatnot), Fed at least contains himself.
Jeez man, don't take it personally.And it's normal for the best player of history to have an ego, every fucking player has an ego, you guys have egos, that's how it works. He can afford that, and it's not like he insults players or whatever, and he always has a nice comment when he looses, apart from a couple of times where he appeared bitter, just like Other players, happens all the time.
Laughable coming from guys sitting in their fucking chairs in front of the computer. The day you have 17 Grand Slams, 76 titles, 2 Olympic Medals, have been number one for 302 weeks, you can open your mouth, and we'll see if you manage to stay firmly on the ground, which he manages to do.
Jeez man, don't take it personally.
That's a bit far-fetched theory.
2013 is going to be interesting. Is Novak going to continue to cement himself, Roger still ready and able, has Andy got over the hump, Rafa post-injury are the rest of the top10 going to make inroads and disrupt the top 4's dominance, Del-Potro maybe positioning himself as the biggest threat to them.
well you know how Roger is...
I think del Potro may make a slam final next year. I just wonder how Nadal's gonna be after so much time off. Will he just storm through the clay season again or will someone else win the French next year?
I think del Potro may make a slam final next year. I just wonder how Nadal's gonna be after so much time off. Will he just storm through the clay season again or will someone else win the French next year?
It is incredible, especially when you consider that the second set was a spectacular chokejob from him, so game-wise he has what it takes to beat Djoker.
I came across this highlights reel recently, it's pretty interesting how Djokovic went from being a ballbasher to a counterpuncher:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAOO__iOhs0
This man disagrees:You don't win slams by being "counterpuncher"
This man disagrees:
He is a classic counterpuncher, just an exceptionally good one. Do you consider only players like Simon to be counterpunchers (even though he doesn't have any punches to speak of)?
That's not how I understand the term. For me counterpuncher is someone who waits for the opportunity to strike and generally prefers/plays longer rallies. It doesn't me he doesn't have the shots, it's just that he most of the time plays more passively. I don't think it's a derogatory term.simon, old murray are classic counter punchers. No real weapons, can't generate pace of their own.
That's not how I understand the term. For me counterpuncher is someone who waits for the opportunity to strike and generally prefers/plays longer rallies. It doesn't me he doesn't have the shots, it's just that he most of the time plays more passively. I don't think it's a derogatory term.
Someone like Simon is generally called pusher.
And in early rounds of tournaments it's Djokovic who dictates play most of the time, it's when he reaches semifinal and final stages of tournaments that he plays a lot more patient brand of tennis. It clearly works for him.