Please catch them alive...
Is this live or a replay?
Yes, section 5 of the public order act means you can't do anything that would cause harassment, alarm or distress to the members of the public. It's designed to tackle issues when maybe someone hasn't committed a crime but is being a nuisance. So if you walk into a high street and shout shit you can get fined, technically even arrested but that would be over kill and any custody sergeant would have a go at an officer for that unless the individual persisted after being fined with a total disregard for authority.
Someone recently got arrested in the UK for putting strips of bacon on door handles to a mosque. It was on the BBC news. So, if Charlie Hebdo tried to distribute these images in the UK, the law would actually be against them. But bear in mind that the key word is public, so it's fine to distribute it online for example.
Rather powder grenades, especially with this smoke. Wondering what happens...I'll bet on flashbangs
.AFP: #BREAKING Police launch assault where Charlie Hebdo suspects holed up: official source
Yeah fuck.. Hope not.Holy shit :/ could even be booby traps
That would be insane, but i hope so too.I hope the hostage is alright
I wonder if they scramble cell phone networks too nowadays in such events?I really hope they managed to cut the TV inside the store before lauching the assault at the grocery...
This does not equal casually using bad language in a public place.
https://www.askthe.police.uk/content/Q675.htm
There are exceptions, if an officer tried to deal with everyone that swore in public he'd never get home for dinner! Everyone does it these days, in casual conversation on the phone/amongst friends etc, but the legal power is there should the Police wish to use it. It's mainly to deal with situations like some annoying chav that hasn't actually done anything wrong for example, or those distributing leaflets of slaughter houses outside fast food chains, or those wearing shirts with naked ladies etc, that stuff.
.
Do you actually read what you post?
"..use of threatening abusive words or behaviour..." and "...profane language in the street to the annoyance of residents...".
Once again, nothing about casual use of bad language, its CLEARLY worded in a way which means i can and will be used against a person participating in anti-Social behaviour, ie, being a drunk chav.
I wonder if they scramble cell phone networks too nowadays in such events?
Time for new thread?
Well I can only echo what Kaisersalsek said, in that I hear swearing in public all the time and no-one ever seems to get fined for it. What you said in your second post - harrassment / alarm / distress/ being a nuisance - is slightly different from simply "swearing in public" imo.
Edit:
Shit (don't fine me), it's kicking off.