• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Terrorist attack in London [up: 6 people killed, ~50 injured, 3 attackers dead]

Sarek

Member
Utopian? Really.

Brasil, Chile, Japan, South Korea, New Zealand, Argentina, Hungary, Iceland, Croatia, Costa Rica, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Uruguay, Singapore...

The list goes on and on, it's not an utopia at all. Stop accepting terrorism as something normal.

Can add Finland to that list. Claiming terrorism, and especially at this level of frequency, is something we just have to live with is just pure nonsense.
 
Would anyone here honestly feel more safer in Brazil?

Despite what you might be feeling right now, the UK is still a very safe place to live. We've suffered relatively few terrorist attacks in the last 15+ years and less than 200 people have been killed in those attacks, let's keep things in perspective.

The hysterics are out of control.
 

Breakage

Member
neighbour of one of the guys from bbc



the guy just had a kid. you can't imagine how warped his mind must be to go from that to this.

Seems these guys place their religious cause above their own family and they are not afraid to die for it. There's something very disturbing about that. The fact that they do not seem to value their own life, freedom or family makes negotiation impossible. What do you say to such a person to discourage them from carrying out their terrorist act?
 

velociraptor

Junior Member
neighbour of one of the guys from bbc



the guy just had a kid. you can't imagine how warped his mind must be to go from that to this.

I saw that interview. How could someone so involved with helping out with homeless shelters be involved in an attack like this? Much like that neighbour, even I felt a state of disbelief.

Truthfully I'm hoping the people behind this ARE NOT regular people, but those that fit the stereotypical profile of being a failure at life.
 

Kurtofan

Member
Utopian? Really.

Brasil, Chile, Japan, South Korea, New Zealand, Argentina, Hungary, Iceland, Croatia, Costa Rica, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Uruguay, Singapore...

The list goes on and on, it's not an utopia at all. Stop accepting terrorism as something normal.

These countries have few Muslims, who are directly targeted for radicalization by Islamic terror groups, what do you suggest to do? Get rid of Muslims?
If you have a magic recipe against radical groups lots of people would like to know it.

Also those countries had their terrorists as well: North Korea for SKorea, the crazy cultists for Japan, Nazis for Poland, Pinochet for Chile... There will always be diseased minds or people that don't fit in, and sometimes there are evil causes popping up to draw those people in. I believe our governments are doing their utmost to fight this evil, but there's no magic formula.
 

Theonik

Member
Can add Finland to that list. Claiming terrorism, and especially at this level of frequency, is something we just have to live with is just pure nonsense.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/dec/04/three-women-shot-dead-outside-restaurant-finland
🤔

These countries have few Muslims, who are directly targeted for radicalization by Islamic terror groups, what do you suggest to do? Get rid of Muslims?
If you have a magic recipe against radical groups lots of people would like to know it.
The trouble is that none of these attackers are active members of any specific organisations but simply act on ideology or more likely being insane.
It's a question of your definition.
 

geordiemp

Member
neighbour of one of the guys from bbc

the guy just had a kid. you can't imagine how warped his mind must be to go from that to this.

The news also said the ground floor flat, first one raided, saw arrest of 4 women all wearing full Burkas, so it appears was a strong faith house hold....
 
Gee way to refute his argument by mentioning caveats that happened quite a while ago on 4 countries out of the 16 he mentioned.

I mentioned only 16 because of course the number is much higher and I got tired early. I just didn't think someone would actually dare me to list the countries that do not suffer terrorism attacks.

I looked up like two countries just to show an example what a turd that list was. And only took one example from Japan, although the list had more of them. But it falls in line with the rest of your posts.

Then don't say "these countries don't have terrorist attacks". That would be wrong. You could probably add my country to the list, but we have also experienced school shootings, for example, and other mass shootings outside of restaurants. I can think of 4-5 mass killings in ten years in Finland. Nobody screamed Allah so again, those don't count I guess. Chile, Brazil... other poster already commented about those.

You make a statement that is an absolute like "who is bombing whom?", then somebody answers to you and you have no comeback and then you go on to the next one, completely of ignoring the post.

I don't think you know how this "discussion" thing works.
 

Maledict

Member
Incidents of terrorism are so rare in western countries that they are swallowed up entirely by the wider crime statistics. Comparing number of incidents is utterly pointless and nothing more than ridiculous headline grabbing and scaremongering.
 

velociraptor

Junior Member
Would anyone here honestly feel more safer in Brazil?

Despite what you might be feeling right now, the UK is still a very safe place to live. We've suffered relatively few terrorist attacks in the last 15+ years and less than 200 people have been killed in those attacks, let's keep things in perspective.

The hysterics are out of control.
Yes I still think the UK is one of the safest countries in the world. Take the US for comparison - hundreds are killed every single week from firearms. Doesn't seem like a very safe place to live. Reportedly 26,000 incidents relating to gun crime in 2017 alone.
 

TTOOLL

Member
I looked up like two countries just to show an example what a turd that list was. But it falls in line with the rest of your posts.

Then don't say "these countries don't have terrorist attacks". That would be wrong. You could probably add my country to the list, but we have also experienced school shootings, for example.

You make a statement that is an absolute like "who is bombing whom?", then somebody answers to you and you have no comeback and then you go on to the next one, completely of ignoring the post.

I don't think you know how this "discussion" thing works.

Sorry, I thought you were smart enough to understand my rhetoric question given the context. I guess I was wrong. Let me be clear. Islamic terrorists, extremist muslins, are bombing and running over people. Satisfied?

Keep thinking terrorism is the norm in the world. I don't care. It just isn't.
 

Razakin

Member
Can add Finland to that list. Claiming terrorism, and especially at this level of frequency, is something we just have to live with is just pure nonsense.
So, you're forgetting the 2002 Myyrmanni Bombing, or the school shootings we had 07 and 08? Sure, we finns don't have 'muslim'-based terrorism, but domestic we do have. Thankfully really rarely.
 

Sarek

Member
So, you're forgetting the 2002 Myyrmanni Bombing, or the school shootings we had 07 and 08? Sure, we finns don't have 'muslim'-based terrorism, but domestic we do have. Thankfully really rarely.

Yeah, that one is legit and I honestly completely forgot about it. That Imatra case has nothing to do with terrorism though.

I think maybe that is their point?

Their point was that everytime someone with mental health issues, or a drunk person kills someone we should call it terrorism?
 

Liha

Banned
Russia decided that to stop the rebels, they would go after the families. It was declared that the family of any terrorist would be arrested and jailed, as it was the families responsibility to prevent members of their family from carrying out terrorist attacks. Thousands of people vanished as rebel families were rounded up and arrested.

Within 5 years the rebel movement was completely broken, the leadership almost completely dissolved and thousands of people dead at the state's hands for no crime other than being a relative of someone else.

I totally agree that western Europe should learn from Russia and it's anti-terror efforts.
 
Sorry, I thought you were smart enough to understand my rhetoric question given the context. I guess I was wrong. Let me be clear. Islamic terrorists, extremist muslins, are bombing and running over people. Satisfied?

Keep thinking terrorism is the norm in the world. I don't care. It just isn't.

And who was bombing whom again? What could possibly be the origin for such hatred and what made it possible for someone like ISIS to gain power?

Terrorism isn't the norm right now either, if we are talking about the yearly death toll. On the rise, yes. Now American mass shootings on the other hand...
 

cromofo

Member
Utopian? Really.

Brasil, Chile, Japan, South Korea, New Zealand, Argentina, Hungary, Iceland, Croatia, Costa Rica, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Uruguay, Singapore...

The list goes on and on, it's not an utopia at all. Stop accepting terrorism as something normal.

Regarding Croatia, Bosnian wahhabism is a thing, and they're just an hour or two drive from our 2nd largest city.

This "utopia" you speak of might change soon.

Damnit, we've had enough of tragedy already during the 90s. An attack here would mean a TOTAL collapse of our country, seeing as we're so dependent on tourism.
 
I totally agree that western Europe should learn from Russia and it's anti-terror efforts.

Yeah, lets also adopt the classy way of killing journalists and anyone who disagrees with Putin. Oh I'm sorry. Those are all random accidents. Could've happened to anyone.

Dictatorship takes care of terrorism, if you don't count the people the dictator causes harm to.
 

cyberheater

PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 Xbone PS4 PS4
Would anyone here honestly feel more safer in Brazil?

Despite what you might be feeling right now, the UK is still a very safe place to live. We've suffered relatively few terrorist attacks in the last 15+ years and less than 200 people have been killed in those attacks, let's keep things in perspective.

The hysterics are out of control.

So people are acting hysterically to people being murdered on our streets by terrorrists are they?

How many people should die before the levels of hysteria are justified in your opinion?
 

Baki

Member
Islamic terror, stuff that was not present in Europe previously sure needs to be taken as it always been here, and will always be here /s

Just because there was other motivated terror here, wee need to accept new different ones as normal?


Yeah no, fuck that


Just when left-, rightwring and separatist terror finally faded away because your own society progressed it's time to import new religious terrorism

We still have right wing terrorism in the UK. Did you forget about the murder of the MP and the white kid that tried to put a bomb on the tube.
 
So people are acting hysterically to people being murdered on our streets by terrorrists are they?

How many people should die before the levels of hysteria are justified in your opinion?

Again, less than 200 people have been killed by terrorists in the UK since 2001.

Every life lost to terrorism is sad, but the way some people are acting in this thread, you'd think we're under daily attack and you will be killed by a terrorist dare you leave your home.

It's a hysterical reaction, let's try to keep things in perspective.
 

Auraela

Banned
Whelp farage is right here its being said in this thread


Former UKIP leader Nigel Farage has told US channel Fox News, where he works as a contributor, he thinks the British public will start demanding internment - or imprisonment without charge - of terror suspects unless the government "gets tough" in its response the London attacks.
 

Apathy

Member
So people are acting hysterically to people being murdered on our streets by terrorrists are they?

How many people should die before the levels of hysteria are justified in your opinion?

The statistical chances of someone dying to a terrorist attack in the western world are ridiculously small. The reason why people get up in arms is a combination of how rare they are and how violent they normally are. There is no level of hysteria that is appropriate for them. Hell, you're more likely to day any given day to getting hit by a car than a terrorist attack but you aren't all hysterical that cars are allowed to be driven.
 

samn

Member
So people are acting hysterically to people being murdered on our streets by terrorrists are they?

How many people should die before the levels of hysteria are justified in your opinion?

Considering people in this thread are arguing for the dismantling of many of our civil liberties and a huge change in the way we live our lives, yes, a certain amount of hysteria over 200 deaths in 12 years is unjustified.

For scale, approximately a thousand people die every year from car accidents and hundreds of thousands have died in the last decade from air pollution. Next to nothing is done and people that suggest reasonable changes that would improve our lives are told to keep their mouths shut and get out of the way.

Apologies for not subjecting myself to this dictatorship of grief but I have had enough of the sanctimony and calls to strip ourselves of freedoms we are unlikely to ever get back.
 

MrS

Banned
Something going down in East Ham now? Not sure if it's related. Bloke on a roof with a gun.

Edit: I think it has been resolved and was linked to arrests earlier in the day.
 

cyberheater

PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 Xbone PS4 PS4
Again, less than 200 people have been killed by terrorists in the UK since 2001.

Every life lost to terrorism is sad, but the way some people are acting in this thread, you'd think we're under daily attack and you will be killed by a terrorist dare you leave your home.

It's a hysterical reaction, let's try to keep things in perspective.

I don't agree with this line of thinking. You are saying people are overeacting and are fearing unnecessarily yet the security services have put our threat level at severe which means "means an attack is highly likely" and it was at CRITICAL which means "an attack is expected imminently".

Perhaps they are acting hysterically too?
 

holygeesus

Banned
Gee way to refute his argument by mentioning caveats that happened quite a while ago on 4 countries out of the 16 he mentioned.

It is a cycle though. My point was there are pretty much no countries that have never had terrorist incidents of varying frequency at different times throughout their history. Currently, we have had what? 3 attacks in the past few weeks, which skews the average, but it is still a comparatively terrorist incident free country.
 

samn

Member
I don't agree with this line of thinking. You are saying people are overeacting and are fearing unnecessarily yet the security services have put our threat level at severe which means "means an attack is highly likely" and it was at CRITICAL which means "an attack is expected imminently".

Perhaps they are acting hysterically too?

The chances of you being personally involved in a terrorist attack are so minuscule as to be beyond human comprehension. Fear of this is hysterical by any reasonable definition. If you feel that you or your loved ones are at personal risk then you're probably the sort of person that buys lottery tickets.
 

Kinyou

Member
So where is the political agenda here? What are the terrorists demanding? Any aims? Are they members of an organisation? What is it? Did they make a statement?
I guess we don't know yet? But are you seriously proposing that those three men aren't connected to a terrorist organisation? That they just happened to band together and just happened to attack the exact same way?
 

cromofo

Member
I feel bad for saying this but I'm becoming kind of indifferent now. I still feel bad but not as much since it's been happening time and time again and it will continue to happen. I guess it lost that shock factor and it translated into "not again".

Such a complex issue won't be solved for a very long time. You can't kill or arrest an ideology.

I see they've been doing a good job stopping some plans/attacks in the past months. Let's hope they continue to do so.

In the meanwhile, stop being buddy buddy with the scum from Saudi Arabia. Start shutting down imams and mosques promoting extremist views and hate speech.

Start working closer with the muslim community in order to catch these bastards before they do something. I expect the muslim community to engage in the same manner and cooperate.
 

Maledict

Member
I don't agree with this line of thinking. You are saying people are overeacting and are fearing unnecessarily yet the security services have put our threat level at severe which means "means an attack is highly likely" and it was at CRITICAL which means "an attack is expected imminently".

Perhaps they are acting hysterically too?

The threat level has been severe since the system was implemented in 2005.

Barring a brief time period between 1998 and 2001 there has always been a substantial risk of a terrorist attack in the Uk in the last 50 years. Irish terrorism is still tracked by security services to this day.
 

Theonik

Member
I guess we don't know yet? But are you seriously assuming that those three men aren't connected to a terrorist organisation? That they just happened to band together and just happened to attack the exact same way?
That has been the case for most of those incidents. Independent cells inspired by previous attacks. That also makes it a lot harder to combat.
I'm not saying this isn't a terrorist attack btw. There is a fair deal of hypocrisy of what kind of madman gets labelled as a terrorist and does not based largely on the politics of the day.
 
From the BBC

Elizabeth O'Neill, mother of Daniel O'Neill, who was stabbed in last night's attack, has been speaking to the BBC.

She said her son, 23, who is recovering in hospital, has a seven inch scar from the knife attack.

"He had just stepped outside the bar for a second and a man ran up to him and said 'this is for my family, this is for Islam' and put a knife in him," Ms O'Neill said.
 

Anung

Un Rama
Start working closer with the muslim community in order to catch these bastards before they do something. I expect the muslim community to engage in the same manner and cooperate.

They have been and they do. Most leads in these kind of cases come directly from the Muslim community. Which is why notion of the Muslim community "not doing enough" is sickening to me and to ‪ostracise them will do nothing but harm in stopping these things before they happen.
 
I don't agree with this line of thinking. You are saying people are overeacting and are fearing unnecessarily yet the security services have put our threat level at severe which means "means an attack is highly likely" and it was at CRITICAL which means "an attack is expected imminently".

Perhaps they are acting hysterically too?

They're not shouting for a muslim ban though.
 
I don't agree with this line of thinking. You are saying people are overeacting and are fearing unnecessarily yet the security services have put our threat level at severe which means "means an attack is highly likely" and it was at CRITICAL which means "an attack is expected imminently".

Perhaps they are acting hysterically too?

If there was a threat level for getting killed by a drunk driver, it would always be critical, and political parties would be making daily statements about respect for the dead, city centres would be on permanent lockdown and no one would ever leave the house around pub closing time out of fear. Terrorism needs to be fought, but the reactions to it are usually disproportionate, giving the terrorists exactly the response they want.
 

cromofo

Member
They have been and they do. Most leads in these kind of cases come directly from the Muslim community. Which is why notion of the Muslim community "not doing enough" is sickening to me and to ‪ostracise them will do nothing but harm in stopping these things before they happen.

Agreed
 

cyberheater

PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 Xbone PS4 PS4
It is a cycle though. My point was there are pretty much no countries that have never had terrorist incidents of varying frequency at different times throughout their history. Currently, we have had what? 3 attacks in the past few weeks, which skews the average, but it is still a comparatively terrorist incident free country.

It doesn't matter about averages or how safe we once were. Right now we are currently sustaining a barrage of terrorist attacks. There was a recent report that five planned terror attacks have been prevented since the Westminster attack on 22 March – a sharp and disturbing increase on the average in recent years of one foiled plot every three months.

Things are getting worse not better. I expect more terrorist attacks going forward.
 

D4Danger

Unconfirmed Member
Here's Farage's hot take. Not that different to some of the stuff in this thread unfortunately.

Former UKIP leader Nigel Farage has told US channel Fox News, where he works as a contributor, he thinks the British public will start demanding internment - or imprisonment without charge - of terror suspects unless the government "gets tough" in its response the London attacks.

At the end of a segment on the mood in Britain, Mr Farage said: "If there is not action, then the calls for internment will grow."
 
Top Bottom