• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Tesla announces new, smaller electric vehicle named Model 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
The pics are from the original article that was confirmed by Tesla. They're a bit detailed and well done to be fakes, as well.

Tesla Twitter said:
FYI, the Model 3 images used by @AutoExpress were mock-ups based on their own speculation.

They are not real.


But man . . . if Tesla were to put out pictures like that and put the car on sale, I'd put down a deposit so fast it would make MY head spin.
 

duderon

rollin' in the gutter
The pics are from the original article that was confirmed by Tesla. They're a bit detailed and well done to be fakes, as well.

It's a render. The car will be revealed in a year or so.

"FYI, the Model 3 images used by @AutoExpress were mock-ups based on their own speculation."

https://twitter.com/TeslaMotors/status/489200528908226561

They are not real.


But man . . . if Tesla were to put out pictures like that and put the car on sale, I'd put down a deposit so fast it would make MY head spin.

It's just a mini-S, man. They can do better!
 
Just wish battery life wasn't an issue in colder climates :(
I think what should be done with this is to use a heater to keep the battery warm whenever the car is plugged in. Electricity is cheap and keeping the battery warm is worth it.

But when the car sits around unplugged . . . there is not much you can do. But if you get an EV, you should have a 'home base' where it is plugged in overnight. (otherwise, you should not be buying an EV.)
 

Chris R

Member
I think what should be done with this is to use a heater to keep the battery warm whenever the car is plugged in. Electricity is cheap and keeping the battery warm is worth it.

But when the car sits around unplugged . . . there is not much you can do. But if you get an EV, you should have a 'home base' where it is plugged in overnight. (otherwise, you should not be buying an EV.)

I plug in my car's engine block heater every night the temp drops below 20F. If I had a garage I think it might work just parking it outdoors at work every day, but with the car being outside all the time the technology just isn't there yet.

But my car still has another 5-10 years in it easy. If I move or get a better paying job I might be able to afford a place with a garage and an electric car :p
 

Mr.Mike

Member
Does coal/fossil fuels fall under "other thermal" in that infographic?

It would. Although that infographic a bit outdated. Quebec has since shut down its nuclear reactor and is now powered entirely by hydro. And Ontario has entirely eliminated coal from its power supply (although the info-graphic lumps it in together with gas anyway).

There's actually a cool site for Ontario that shows how the power being used right now is being generated. http://media.cns-snc.ca/ontarioelectricity/ontarioelectricity.html
 

ezrarh

Member
I am looking forward to purchasing one of these in the future. Don't think I'll replace my current car for another 6-7 years even though it's a gas guzzler at the moment. Hopefully by then, I'll have a house and it'll make charging easy.
 
I plug in my car's engine block heater every night the temp drops below 20F. If I had a garage I think it might work just parking it outdoors at work every day, but with the car being outside all the time the technology just isn't there yet.

But my car still has another 5-10 years in it easy. If I move or get a better paying job I might be able to afford a place with a garage and an electric car :p

Well . . . it is not surprising that the Chevy Volt is the #1 plug-in in Canada. Batteries definitely don't do well in really cold temps. You can heat them if you are plugged in. But not much you can do if the car is not plugged in and just sitting in cold weather. That is a tough situation.
 
It would. Although that infographic a bit outdated. Quebec has since shut down its nuclear reactor and is now powered entirely by hydro. And Ontario has entirely eliminated coal from its power supply (although the info-graphic lumps it in together with gas anyway).

There's actually a cool site for Ontario that shows how the power being used right now is being generated. http://media.cns-snc.ca/ontarioelectricity/ontarioelectricity.html
Canada, like Norway, is blessed with oil and lots of hydropower. I hope you use the two as wisely as Norway does. They sell the oil to foreigners and have a high local gas tax while providing a huge incentive for EVs.

As the drug dealers say: "Don't get high on your own supply."
 
Saw a beautiful red Tesla S tonight. Maybe the next gen version, further technologically revised will be what I end up with down the road.

They say crossover, more like a hot hatchback?
 

NateDrake

Member
I think what should be done with this is to use a heater to keep the battery warm whenever the car is plugged in. Electricity is cheap and keeping the battery warm is worth it.

But when the car sits around unplugged . . . there is not much you can do. But if you get an EV, you should have a 'home base' where it is plugged in overnight. (otherwise, you should not be buying an EV.)

This is why I haven't gone with an EV yet. Living in New England is bothersome with the winter season. We either have tons of snow and frigid temps, or we have relatively mild winters. I have no space for a garage at the moment, either.
 
This is why I haven't gone with an EV yet. Living in New England is bothersome with the winter season. We either have tons of snow and frigid temps, or we have relatively mild winters. I have no space for a garage at the moment, either.
Pfft. Mild NE winters could easily be handled if it has a 200 mile EPA range. But you absolutely need a home base to plug in over night.
 

Ty4on

Member
How do they make more profit on suvs than they do on cars?

The price increase for the the space convenience has always seemed right to me.

Small, cheap cars compete mostly on price and have slim margins. Empty space in the cabin doesn't cost anything :p

Build a computer and you'll realize how hard it is to make a very cheap one not because of the CPU and GPU, but because of all the basics like RAM and PSU. Same with small cars.
 

NateDrake

Member
Pfft. Mild NE winters could easily be handled if it has a 200 mile EPA range. But you absolutely need a home base to plug in over night.

I have an outdoor patio near my driveway now that as an outside outlet - so I could easily run the cord. A garage would just give that extra sense of security.
 
Pics:

tesla-model-e-front_0.jpg


tesla-model-e-rear_0.jpg
If it looks anything like that, Elon has my axe.
 

Zaptruder

Banned
Man... new car future is exciting.

Tesla + Google AI self driving car tech = unstoppable American car dominance.

In a massively deflated market because people will be taking up subscription transportation services enabled by the likes of Uber.
 

EloquentM

aka Mannny
I don't believe they'll hit that number. Maybe when the gigafactory is up and running. But if they can get it below $40K for a base model, gets 200 miles EPA rated range, be supercharger capable, and looks good . . . it will still be a huge hit.

This is the future. 100% torque at 0 RPM. Fuel up at home. No oil drips. No smog checks. No paying for gasoline. Can generate fuel on your rooftop with solar PV. No smells. No oil change. Low maintenance. No engine noise. No lurching transmission. No local emissions. Driving on electricity is extremely cheap. No exhaust.




S3X!
Some of us like engine noise.
 

ЯAW

Banned
Man... new car future is exciting.

Tesla + Google AI self driving car tech = unstoppable American car dominance.

In a massively deflated market because people will be taking up subscription transportation services enabled by the likes of Uber.

I still think Fuel Cell cars will overtake EVs. EV has good headstart but in a decade I can see Japanese car makers dominating the markets with Fuel Cell cars.
 

Fou-Lu

Member
Uh . . . you can use one right now. Nothing stopping you. But they are damn expensive.

And they just installed their first Canadian supercharger (Vancouver).
http://insideevs.com/canadas-first-tesla-supercharger-now-open/

Well, as far as I am aware it'll still be a while until I can cross Canada using one and I currently travel a lot. Mind you I'll probably be stuck on Vancouver Island for grad school, so we'll see, of course by that point might as well wait for the Model 3.
 

Zaptruder

Banned
ЯAW;121236109 said:
I still think Fuel Cell cars will overtake EVs. EV has good headstart but in a decade I can see Japanese car makers dominating the markets with Fuel Cell cars.

Fuel cell? You mean the biggest crock of shit cell car?

They're unworkable due to the requirement of setting up entirely new fueling infrastructure. EVs are now, they work fine and you can recharge from home. And Tesla are proving that you can recharge them on the go as well.
 

Funky Papa

FUNK-Y-PPA-4
Fuel Cell is DOA. It only exists because of lobbying by the oil industry looking to extend their influence.

Like fuck all it's going to happen. Specially once the newer batteries come.
 
Yes, it would be by far the cheapest.

The current cheapest is around $69K before tax credit. That is a 60 kwh Model S.


My car cost me $22K and I get 30mpg. So I crunched the numbers and assuming gas costs $3.30/gal ( thats the avg. in Texas right now ), that means it costs me 11 cents per mile. I would need to drive 428,000 miles before making up the $47K difference in sticker cost between my gas car and the Tesla. How large is that green tax credit refund?
 

Zaptruder

Banned
My car cost me $22K and I get 30mpg. So I crunched the numbers and assuming gas costs $3.30/gal ( thats the avg. in Texas right now ), that means it costs me 11 cents per mile. I would need to drive 428,000 miles before making up the $47K difference in sticker cost between my gas car and the Tesla. How large is that green tax credit refund?

It's alright buddy. We can both sub to AI driven car fleet services in the future. Won't have to worry about overhead costs of vehicle maintenance.
 

ЯAW

Banned
Fuel Cell is DOA. It only exists because of lobbying by the oil industry looking to extend their influence.

Like fuck all it's going to happen. Specially once the newer batteries come.

Honda and Toyota seems to think otherwise, they are really pushing for Fuel Cell cars. Not saying they are better option but if Japanese manufacturers are going choose FC over EV then there is going to be big fight where EVs might not turn as winners.

Tesla is awesome company but we need other big manufacturers take electric cars seriously as Tesla is taking them.
 

Funky Papa

FUNK-Y-PPA-4
ЯAW;121243234 said:
Honda and Toyota seems to think otherwise, they are really pushing for Fuel Cell cars. Not saying they are better option but if Japanese manufacturers are going choose FC over EV then there is going to be big fight where EVs might not turn as winners.

Tesla is awesome company but we need other big manufacturers take electric cars seriously as Tesla is taking them.

Just like Daimler, Japanese manufacturers are not pushing for Fuell Cell as much as keeping the tech there just in case they find some breakthrough in efficiency and because of grants. Fuel Cell development would implode without subsidies. It's DOA. There's zero commercial interest in it.
 

ЯAW

Banned
Just like Daimler, Japanese manufacturers are not pushing for Fuell Cell as much as keeping the tech there just in case they find some breakthrough in efficiency and because of grants. Fuel Cell development would implode without subsidies. It's DOA. There's zero commercial interest in it.

So, when Toyota announces they are moving away from pure electric vehicles and go after hybirds right now and in near future Fuel-Cells, they are just blowing smoke?

These types of announcements do have effect on shareholders so I doubt it's all smoke and mirrors so they can chase subsidies. Especially when Toyota even stopped their r&d with Tesla just this year.
http://www.autonews.com/article/201...away-from-evs-in-favor-of-hydrogen-fuel-cells
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/04/autos-electric-hydrogen-idUSL1N0B11YO20130204
 
Wasn't this announced 2 years ago?
Kind of. Both the Model S & Model III (then BlueStar) were acknowledged at the launch of the Roadster. IIRC, Tesla aimed to cut the price by 40-50% in each generation. That proved to be unrealistic, but they came close: ~$110K Roadster, ~$70K Model S, ~$35-45K Model III.
 

Funky Papa

FUNK-Y-PPA-4
ЯAW;121244668 said:
So, when Toyota announces they are moving away from pure electric vehicles and go after hybirds right now and in near future Fuel-Cells, they are just blowing smoke?

These types of announcements do have effect on shareholders so I doubt it's all smoke and mirrors so they can chase subsidies. Especially when Toyota even stopped their r&d with Tesla just this year.
http://www.autonews.com/article/201...away-from-evs-in-favor-of-hydrogen-fuel-cells
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/04/autos-electric-hydrogen-idUSL1N0B11YO20130204

They just don't have the tech to compete with Tesla. Nobody has. Their electrics cars have bombed because they were just plain uncompetitive, so they are trying not to put all their eggs in the same basket while they develop better electric cars and keep getting grants.

Commercial interest in fuel cell is zero, at least when it comes to cars. There are other kinds of applications in which it could be useful, but FCVs will remain a rarity.
 

Rafterman

Banned
Electric cars are still far too limiting to be a viable option IMO. Cost, range, size, power, etc. are all still problems and if this car isn't going to be available for another 2-3 years it seems those will all still be issues for many years to come.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom