Not a bad list at all. Inception should be first, but Skyfall is an excellent contender. Goddamn those movies are overhyped here.
Slumdog is overrated? I mean, it's not an amazing film, it's ok, but I don't think I've seen people rave about Slumdog that many times. Not worthy of the Best Picture? Yes. Overrated? Nah.
Clockwork Orange is definitively his worst film. All the problems I have with 2001 are mirrored in ACO but with the added detriment of the awful script and some really badly framed scenes.
I would agree that 2001 is a 'truly artistic' sci-fi film but I would not want other filmmakers to try and make another one. The wonder of science and space is limited by Kubrick's vision. When I think of art and science and fiction being mixed together perfectly, I think of Cosmos (the original). Kubrick's version of space and the future is one of stark boredom and advancements catalyzed by strange and god-like forces, whereas Sagan's version of space and the future are optimistic and very much anthropomorphic.
Maybe it's a tonal difference that I can't agree with.
I don't know about that. Lolita is pretty garbage.
To me the film is enjoyable but a mess and to think some people on here were saying Skyfall was better than Casino Royale.
I just quoted you saying The Rock is better than 2001. I think I addressed the point pretty well. Unless it was too subtle?You're not addressing the point though. People not enjoying Kubrick's filmmaking style in 2001 does not automatically mean that they enjoy Michael Bay. Can you expand a bit on why you think that?
Just switch Double Life of Veronique with Mulholland Drive and I'd agree with that point.
I don't see Network as overrated. It's got some good parts but also plenty of problems / things that didn't age well, which is how I've seen pretty much everyone describe it.
Also, number one movie on any "overrated movie"-list I'd make would be Pulp Fiction. I won't make any lists though cause labeling movies as overrated is pointless.
This list confirms one thing.. Forrest Gump is still the greatest movie of all time.
Agreed with Inception. And all of the Nolan Batman films.
The list will be updated when he sees Fight Club.
Yes.Can't we just agree that a good critic never needs to use the word "overrated" ?
The disdain for Skyfall in this thread makes me sad.
At this point, everyone should realize that "overrated" actually means "people like it but I don't".
'Overrated' is the most overrated criticism of them all.
And here I was going to try to embarrass you, now I have to thank you for saving me from having to type a long post on my phone.
Oh, the internet...
People on the internet saying that timeless classics like Amarcord, Ikiru, Videodrome or the Double Life of Veronique are overrated, became overrated by itself.
They are? Pretty much any thread that has even the slightest mention of inception has people rushing to come in and remind everyone how shit it is. It got a pretty positive response initially but since then it has been nothing but hate. Skyfall has been heading in a similar direction, positive initial reaction but has been receiving an increasing amount of backlash.
You don't like them so they must be shitty.The people who hype these movies have already moved on and found new shitty movies to hype like Gravity and Frozen.
Same, I think the backlash is overblown. Skyfall was great.
It added back a lot of what was missing in the reboot of Bond, it felt more like a Bond film and the more personal take it took on things set the films up perfectly for what comes next.
I think it set things in place much better than Casino Royale which for me fell apart after the poker game and descended into some cringeworthy stuff.
Maybe Skyfall will be better appreciated again depending on what comes next. They are still searching for the template of modern Bond really, but I think they are almost there now.
I just quoted you saying The Rock is better than 2001. I think I addressed the point pretty well. Unless it was too subtle?
I agree.
I love Casino Royale a great deal, but going back to it can get tedious because it's pretty relentless in the way it goes from one big action set piece to the next, every one of which feels like they could be THE climactic finish to just about any action film. Casino Royale is at it's best when it slows things down to give the characters some room to breathe, and most of this happens at the casino.
For me, though, Skyfall's direction and cinematography (Roger Deakins for the win, mawfukkas) alone put it on another level of filmmaking. Sam Mendes strips Bond down to the core, leaving him with his most basic and primal elements and forcing him to "evolve with the times or die". The villain is brilliantly realized and has a very personal motive which makes him the perfect foil for Bond; he's everything sinister and ugly that guys like Bond could have ended up being, a reverse image of Bond. Not every Bond villain needs grand schemes for conspiracy or world domination.
It's an elegantly simple and effective Bond film, and it's brimming with characterization and subtext. Also, Roger Deakins just plain kills it as DP...what a goddamn gorgeous film to look at:
Overrated, they say? I laugh.
Could you explain what makes these shots good? Honest question.
Could you explain what makes these shots good? Honest question.
If you measure quality in cheap thrills, sure.No, he's quite correct. The Rock shits all over 2001.
I have never seen Slumdog, but I agree about Inception. The Departed had enough irony in it for me to like it, but it's far from my favorite Scorsese film.I might have taken it a bit seriously if it wasn't a shit list, it wasn't grasping at straws trying not to offend certain groups, and it wasn't so ridiculous as to say "all time" only to have half the list be from the last 10 years.
The Departed and Inception are shit, and Slumdog and Million Dollar Baby meh, though.