Forceatowulf
G***n S**n*bi
Was hoping for Eternal Sunshine of the spotless mind and Amalie. Because god damn are those movies overrated as the FUCK
But what about the composition and the lighting in those shots, specifically?
Criticizing a film with the word "overrated" is definitely bad, it's basically "my opinion > yous" in disguise, that's why people generally don't like this kind of stuff.I wasn't talking about giving movies arbitrary scores or even this article in particular, but about people who generally try to refute criticism simply saying stuff along the lines of "people have different opinions".
Even though I don't like the movie, but I would still say this a bad way to criticize a film. And the author of the article is hardly any better, he sure did use a lot of adjectives to shit on films he didn't like, some films' criticism aren't even criticism, and the whole article is giving off "people love them so I dare not speak ill of them at first"-rant vibe, look at the first half of Inception's, what the hell is that?Oh, I forgot about The Hurt Locker. Now that was an overrated piece of shit.
wtf at the 2001 mentions...
Videodrome (David Cronenberg, 1983)
LOL wat?
Skyfall? Really? Who overrates that? It's a middle of the road film in a 23 film series.
The only thing more boring than 2001 is the people who think they are better for thinking such a boring movie is amazing.A lot of twitchy kids with add that can't sit through a slow paced movie who regular a video game website? No, way, couldn't be that... the movie must just be worse than we think.
I don't think I'm better for thinking it's amazing. I just think it's amazing. And entertaining. And that it has an awesome plot.The only thing more boring than 2001 is the people who think they are better for thinking such a boring movie is amazing.
Was hoping for Eternal Sunshine of the spotless mind and Amalie. Because god damn are those movies overrated as the FUCK
Schattenjäger;108928635 said:I always had a problem with The Departed as it's only Infernal Affairs with Boston accents
The only thing more boring than 2001 is the people who think they are better for thinking such a boring movie is amazing.
I don't think I'm better for thinking it's amazing. I just think it's amazing. And entertaining. And that it has an awesome plot.
I agree, it needs more explosions and chase scenes.
Yes but the problem is that overrated can easily be used as an insult. Saying that the masses are stupid or sheep or pretentious for thinking something is good while a single person disagrees.Well you didn't attack people who criticized the film for being 'twitchy kids' or insinuate that Michael Bay is perhaps more their speed. You think it's great, I don't think it's great, we can disagree without resorting to boring ad hominem attacks.
Criticizing a film with the word "overrated" is definitely bad, it's basically "my opinion > yous" in disguise, that's why people generally don't like this kind of stuff.
"Have you ever seen 2001.... ON WEED?"
It's one of the most technically impressive movies of all time, which makes it extremely important. In every other way though it's a mediocre Kubrick film.
The Third Act, while having a strong start (and the only interesting character in HAL), is demolished by the Alien Hotel Space Baby epilogue. The first acts aren't near as offensive as the end of the film, though the length of time Kubrick spends focused on those monkey's comes close.
He almost takes 'Show Don't Tell' too far and shows us too much of what he's trying to tell us. About halfway through the opening act you understand what the filmmaker is trying to say, yet he's going to linger here for the next 20 minutes anyway for no discernible reason. The same could be said for every other long and lingering shot or plot element.
Full Metal Jacket should have ended at the end of basic training. The movie takes a huge nosedive after that point.
I see Blade Runner has been brought up already -_-
I give it zero explosions out of ten. Overrated!
Yeah, but it didn't end with the villain being blown to pieces now, did it?Tons of explosions in the opening few seconds of the film.
The thing about 2001 is that you don't have to have ADHD to find it dull and boring. That's a very unfair insult that doesn't apply to the vast majority.
And it is completely possible to deliver an intelligent, contemplative, and immersive scifi movie while actually having good pacing. Just watch Contact, or ALL of Sunshine. It doesn't have to be just the two extremes of either 2001 or... a Michael Bay movie.
The thing about 2001 is that you don't have to have ADHD to find it dull and boring. That's a very unfair insult that doesn't apply to the vast majority.
And it is completely possible to deliver an intelligent, contemplative, and immersive scifi movie while actually having good pacing. Just watch Contact, or the first two thirds of Sunshine. It doesn't have to be just the two extremes of either 2001 or... a Michael Bay movie.
fixed.
But seriously I love everything about Sunshine, EVERYTHING.
The actual most overrated films: The Shawshank Redemption. Batman Begins. The Dark Knight. Every super hero film ever made. Shindler's List. Saving Private Ryan. Forrest Gump. The Green Mile. Tom Hanks. Aliens. Titanic. Good Will Hunting. Dead Poets Society. The Artist. Les Miserables. The Kings Speech.
I do like Aliens. I think it has come to define the franchise though. Maybe it's the franchise that's overrated rather than an any individual film.Even as a cinephile, I greatly enjoyed The King's Speech. And also Aliens.
The only thing more boring than 2001 is the people who think they are better for thinking such a boring movie is amazing.
fixed.
But seriously I love everything about Sunshine, EVERYTHING.
I dunno, that "SO THE RELIGIOUS GUY IS CRAZY" thing was kinda dull, I thought. Felt forced into the script by the studio, and didn't seem to match the tone of the movie, especially because the journey to the sun feels like a religious experience itself.
Define pacing, please? I found all four acts thoroughly engaging and hypnotizing, from beginning to end. The tone of the movie was consistent throughout and it remained faithful to its theme to the very end.And it is completely possible to deliver an intelligent, contemplative, and immersive scifi movie while actually having good pacing.
The thing about 2001 is that you don't have to have ADHD to find it dull and boring. That's a very unfair insult that doesn't apply to the vast majority.
And it is completely possible to deliver an intelligent, contemplative, and immersive scifi movie while actually having good pacing. Just watch Contact, or the first two thirds of Sunshine. It doesn't have to be just the two extremes of either 2001 or... a Michael Bay movie.
Do I detect a Pulp Fiction fan? If so, my man!
Oh, and Moon's another great scifi movie with good pacing. It's not moving at a breakneck pace, but it keeps you invested and intrigued. There's a rich human element to latch onto and it's not just a dull lifeless experience like 2001.
But slow pacing isn't inherently bad. Breaking Bad for instance, I don't think I would have been half as connected to the characters without seeing all those slow moments.
Still, there are some people who can't accept it under any circumstances though. Maybe I can learn to accept their point of view, but these are still oppinions that need to be ignored, not pedestaled, at least from where I'm sitting.
The humans in 2001 might as well be robots. Kubrick (intentionally) drains them of all emotion and humanity and personality. You watch them scrapping microwaved pudding off of their space tray and you wonder why you're spending your life watching this.
Thats virtually every Kubrick movie post Strangelove
(The robot, lifeless part, not the this is boring part)
You don't really come to a Kubrick move for complex human emotion and warmth.