I would've honestly loved seeing The Grand Budapest Hotel winning Best Picture.
Movies hit us more deeply when they deal with what is relevant in our lives. The films that deal with the issues of filmmaking itself or acting get extra points because the members of the industry understand what is like in one way or another more easily than, for instance, what is like to be a physicist, and spy, or a soldier, etc.
Terrible example there...
What did that piece of crap win?
Oh. I see now.
Holy shit there are actually a sizeable number of people here who hated Birdman?!
I thought it was an absolute masterpiece in character study, acting, directing and editing. I would say it absolutely deserves best picture, but I can't, because I haven't seen most of the other best pic noms.
But it was brilliant. Forgotten in a month?! Get out of here. Probably the best movie to win an Oscar since No Country For Old Men.
It was solid. Not in the league of Moonrise Kingdom, Master, Django and Amour. But it was a weak year, so there is that.
The last two years (2012 and 2013) were strong years. 2013 especially, which was fucking loaded. This year was really weak by comparison, weakest since 2011 (The Artist).
I didn't like him in Les Miserables, but I think I was just put off by his weird face.
I honestly would have been cool with either one, seeing as I loved both of them.yeah. I really liked Birdman because of Keaton, but I LOVED Grand Budapest Hotel. I could watch it over and over again.
Why? That movie is still well regarded and remembered. Even on neogaf there is an LTTP or RTTP thread that comes up about it and There Will Be Blood every few months. Better film than all the others since - not that I am saying that all the other best picture winners have been bad.
Regardless, people shouldn't get so upset about the Oscar winners. I doubt we could even pick a single movie from the last 20 years that a majority of gaffers would agree on should have won for that year, so why do people continue to be bothered when the voters vote differently than their own opinions?
Guess I should've watched Gone Girl before watching the Oscars.
Link?HTTYD fans are rioting on Tumblr, holy shit. o.o
Sean Hannity is salty on twitter, lmao
The last two years (2012 and 2013) were strong years. 2013 especially, which was fucking loaded. This year was really weak by comparison, weakest since 2011 (The Artist).
Any year that has Moonrise, Amour and Django is not a weak year.
I didn't think HTTYD2 was all that good. Wasn't bad, but I thought it wasn't nearly as good as the first one. I'd put Big Hero 6 over it.
The last two years (2012 and 2013) were strong years. 2013 especially, which was fucking loaded. This year was really weak by comparison, weakest since 2011 (The Artist).
That's the only way to explain shit like Argo winning.
2012 was The Artist. 2011 was King's Speech, which was arguably worse.
Best Animated Picture
Character Study? The characters are 1 dimensional. None of them are believable, and every scene is a 30 second screaming match about how nothing has meaning at all.
It's the sort of confusing messagless meandering thing that high college kids will ramble on about for the next 6 months about being deep and meaningful without anyone actually being able to tell you what it was about.
It also served as a way for a bunch of hollywood actors who have starred in big budget movies to take a giant dump on bid budget movies.
I would have left the theater halfway through the stupid mans No Exit, except I wanted to suffer through it so that anyone who posited the opinion that the movie had anything redeeming about it couldn't hold over me that I hadn't finished the movie.
Which means I got to see the marvelous scene where he shoots his beak off.
People mad because American Sniper didn't win.
Redmayne did an incredible job in Theory, so I'm not disappointed that Keaton didn't win.
I'm going to settle this Birdman/Boyhood debate once and for all:
Nightcrawler was better than both of them.
Character Study? The characters are 1 dimensional. None of them are believable, and every scene is a 30 second screaming match about how nothing has meaning at all.
It's the sort of confusing messagless meandering thing that high college kids will ramble on about for the next 6 months about being deep and meaningful without anyone actually being able to tell you what it was about.
It also served as a way for a bunch of hollywood actors who have starred in big budget movies to take a giant dump on bid budget movies.
I would have left the theater halfway through the stupid mans No Exit, except I wanted to suffer through it so that anyone who posited the opinion that the movie had anything redeeming about it couldn't hold over me that I hadn't finished the movie.
Which means I got to see the marvelous scene where he shoots his beak off. because SYMBOLISM. Do you get it? He shot his BEAK off!
I........ couldn't disagree more. I don't think it was confusing in the slightest and the characters were certainly not one-dimensional.
But your angry dismissal of this film is so severe I don't even know how any kind of discussion could be worthwhile. So I'll just say I couldn't disagree more.
I like NCFOM, But imo There Will Be Blood was quite possibly the best movie of 2000-2009 and it was CRIMINAL that it lost.
And I thought it was about a washed up actor slowing going crazy. The whole movie is playing out in Keaton's head. Seems quite easy to follow... Maybe that is just me though.
It makes THE pointIt doesn't make a point at all.
I'm going to settle this Birdman/Boyhood debate once and for all:
Nightcrawler was better than both of them.
I'm going to settle this Birdman/Boyhood debate once and for all:
Nightcrawler was better than both of them.
American Sniper even being nominated is a joke. If people in the Academy were actually being honest with themselves, both "Dawn of the Planet of the Apes" and "Edge of Tomorrow," summer action blockbusters, were leagues better in quality.
Yes, reductionism does make for fun arguments.