Teletraan1
Banned
It's more about themes now than season-long plotlines. The bioweapon, the agriculture stuff, and even Tuan, are related.
With the bioweapon, they believed they were working to help their country defend its citizens, then it turned out they were helping the Soviets murder people in a very gruesome way.
With the GMO crops, they thought they were stopping an operation aimed at starving out the Soviet people, then it turned out their enemy was actually doing work that could help people all over the world. This realization, however, came after they murdered a man working toward that goal.
With Tuan, they realized that their KGB insticts and methods just makes them look like bullies (although they might be more to that story, but at this point it sure seems like it was a wrong call, and that the purpose of the storyline was to cast more doubt on the work they do and how they do it).
At least to me, the show at this point is about the final erosion of Philip and Liz's belief that they are on the right side of history, and how there are very few, if any, winners in this game. That certainly includes Stan, Oleg, Martha, Gabriel, Tuan, and by extension, Henry, Paige, etc.
Other shows quickly build up a character over an episode or two (The Walking Dead is a repeat offender) to give more weight to their demise. The Americans has been doing this remarkably evenly for a remarkable number of characters. I understand why some find the pacing of the show a turnoff, but I definitely feel that it serves a purpose. There is no way that all major characters will end up dead by the end (which is the only way many shows do tragedy), but I believe the show is going in a direction where we will still be able to appreciate the full weight of their personal tragedies, even if that "only" means estrangement, loneliness, and disillusionment.
Amazing post. I wholeheartedly agree.