Really? It says 29 hwy on the webpage...Get the Mustang. It has far more power, awesome MPG, and more fun to drive. Only downside is that it's a Mustang. :\
Really? It says 29 hwy on the webpage...Get the Mustang. It has far more power, awesome MPG, and more fun to drive. Only downside is that it's a Mustang. :\
Really? It says 29 hwy on the webpage...
For a powerful sports coupe sure, but it's a third more on some of the other cars he is looking at.Nearly 30MPG on a 3.7L 306HP, sports coupe is not awesome...how?
It's not only awesome, but it's also underrated.
For a powerful sports coupe sure, but it's a third more on some of the other cars he is looking at.
I have also seen 34 in a 24 year old pick up
That doesn't make 19/29 amazingI'd rather have 120HP more, and have a more exciting drive, as opposed to better fuel efficiency.
That doesn't make 19/29 amazing
Nearly 30MPG on a 3.7L 306HP, sports coupe is not awesome...how?
It's not only awesome, but it's also underrated.
Who used the word "amazing"? Certainly not me.
In the context of a reasonably powerful car like the Mustang, 30MPG highway is "awesome". Get over it already and stop harping on the subject.
That doesn't make 19/29 amazing
I looked through the equipment list of the Mazda 3 and found this quite odd. It's as if they want to make the 2.0 to look cheaper.
Who used the word "amazing"? Certainly not me.
In the context of a reasonably powerful car like the Mustang, 30MPG highway is "awesome". Get over it already and stop harping on the subject.
someone i know just bought an m235i today.
Mazda 3 also gets crazy good gas mileage and feels about 10k more expensive than it really is. Problem is that the hatchback is wildly overpriced and the sedan is a cockblocker aesthetically. If you're married and dead inside, sedan makes much more sense.
why do people have foglights on during not foggy days?
why do people have foglights on during not foggy days?
I answered that in my second post. I commented because of the context.Um, sure it does. 30+ mpg on highway with RWD + big V6 + 3600 lb car? Come on now... the Mazda 3 weighs like 2800 lbs, has a motor with almost half the displacement and is FWD.
Mustang gets amazing MPG. Period.
Here they're equel in the day if you run them with parking lights, but they can't be used with low beams making it illegal to use them at night. On a dark road, especially in the rain, they can be quite blinding creating a wall of light.Are fog-lights considered the same as daytime running lights? Or are fog-light actually brighter?
mmmm
local BMW dealer is supposed to call me the minute these are in.
why do people have foglights on during not foggy days?
someone i know just bought an m235i today.
Looks so much better than 1 series. Great car from what I've read of it.
what are technically foglights anyways? The lights on the bumper don't have to be them right?
Pictures of the facelifted Ford Focus:
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2014-ford-focus-facelift-leaked-images/med/#photo-2443256/
The interior is much simpler and nicer now. three spoked wheel though.. I hate them.
why do people have foglights on during not foggy days?
Am I the only one who'd prefer the 228i with the Msport over the M235i?
Cheaper, more reliable engine, lower weight (3260lbs for manual vs 3500+lbs) and much better weight distribution, it's a turbo so you can boost it to 300hp, etc...Only missing option is a limited slip diff, which I'm sure can be found aftermarket.
It just looks like it'd be more fun to drive.
Test drove an M235i this morning.
I shouldn't have done that lol. Now I want one bad. I was almost ready to sign some papers but it was a white auto one. I do have to say as a long time auto hater the transmission in that thing is pretty fucking good.
Yeah its pretty heavy but it moves that weight around very well.
Wonder how much insurance would be for the thing...
Its really not that much cheaper though, and I'm not really sure how much the m-sport adaptable suspension adds in weight...
I drove the 228 and 235 back to back and it was night and day, I think you are pretty optimistic to think you can easily get another 60hp out of the motor easily without sacrificing torque or lag. How much in aftermarket parts do you think that will cost? You will easily be over the price of the 235 and have a high strung 4 cylinder... congrats it weighs 250lbs less.
Similarly equipped it's 5-6K cheaper and you can get a $400 chip that will give you 40hp + 60tq. Spend a few more hundred bucks for an intake/exhaust and you're at 300hp.
Handling will be much better due to much better weight distribution, true 50/50 instead of 54/46 like the M235i. It's easy enough to add power, not so easy to remove weight and improve handling without sacrificing daily drivability.
jizzinpants.gif
Perfect.
It's the same engine used in a billion other BMW's.I think you are in lala land dude. The car just came out, there are no chips or intakes and shit for it yet.
That only applies if you're talking about engine power. How are you going to make up for that 250lb extra when it comes to driving feel and handling, nimbleness?Anything you can cheaply and easily do to the 228 you could also do to the 235 and get far more out of it.
Why buy the 235i at all when you can get the 435i, it's only 75lbs heavier. The 228i fills a niche of a semi-lightweight modern BMW...BTW the weight distribution is actually 51.9/48.1% on the M235i, I HIGHLY doubt you could actually feel the difference in real driving. You can certainly feel that 4 cylinder struggle though.
I think you are in lala land dude. The car just came out, there are no chips or intakes and shit for it yet.
It's the same engine used in a billion other BMW's.
That only applies if you're talking about engine power. How are you going to make up for that 250lb extra when it comes to driving feel and handling, nimbleness?
Why buy the 235i at all when you can get the 435i, it's only 75lbs heavier. The 228i fills a niche of a semi-lightweight modern BMW...
He's right. You're wrong regarding the mods.
This is the same engine and transmission as found in the X1, X3, 328i, 428i, and 528i. There's nothing new about the 2-series besides its body work. All of the tunes are already compatible with it. I'm sure even the intakes will compatible.
I'd still get the M235i, though.
He said as much in his postOK even if there is mods (I don't see any?) for it you can't deny the 6 cylinder is a much better base than the 4 cylinder?
All the fun of a super sedan with enough room for a pack of Border Collies. That's all I want.
Cadillac is way too gaudy for my taste. It's like the automotive equivalent of a giant gold chain.CTS V Wagon. You're welcome. I can't wait to get one, maybe this year if I decide I crave a wagon. 6 speed, blue, wagon... done.
All the fun of a super sedan with enough room for a pack of Border Collies. That's all I want.
Cadillac is way too gaudy for my taste. It's like the automotive equivalent of a giant gold chain.
Sure but I wouldn't buy a BMW if the most important thing in a car for me was straight line performance. The M3 didn't become a legend because of its straight line performance, the best m3 according to many only has 4 cylinders and isn't even that fast. That's the BMW soul that's been lost with the new generation and I see the 228i a step in the right direction to get close to that than a front heavy overweight 6 cylinder.OK even if there is mods (I don't see any?) for it you can't deny the 6 cylinder is a much better base than the 4 cylinder?
Smokey must have opened YNAB when he saw this post.