Why trash?
Because they're essentially the same performance as the STI from 7-8 years ago wrapped in a new body? With the same damn engine? It's a joke at this point.
Why trash?
ack to that 0-60 time for a moment – the STI's number is only 0.3 seconds quicker than the normal WRX, and a lot of that comes down to exactly how the power is delivered. In the WRX, the 258 pound-feet of twist comes on as low as 2,000 rpm, while the STI doesn't fully deliver its thrust until higher in the rev range. The winged sedan suffers a bit more in the way of turbo lag compared to its less-powerful sibling, but Subaru has retuned the throttle response to at least make the experience seem a bit punchier. The company's engineers say that, at 25 percent throttle input, the STI delivers more response than a 50-percent input in the old car. In other words, there's more oomph available closer to initial tip-in, but the experience doesn't come off as sudden or non-linear. The throttle is easy to modulate, and the STI feels properly quick, with a greater sense of urgency than the normal WRX. Subaru's SI-Drive system is also part of the STI package, with Intelligent, Sport, and Sport Sharp modes that alter throttle mapping depending on the driver's deman
In addition to the new active torque vectoring all-wheel-drive system, the STI gets another bit of increased electronic wizardry for 2015 – the Multi-Mode Driver Controlled Center Differential (DCCD). Upon startup, the STI defaults to a standard 41/59 front/rear torque split, with three different driving modes that alter the behavior of the system as necessary. Full Auto mode is what you'll want for the vast majority of daily driving – even spirited runs. But on the track, Auto - (minus) was our best friend, making less use of the center differential to hold more torque toward the rear more frequently. On the opposite end, Auto + tightens the limited-slip differential, for better control in the wet, or on gravel/snow. There's even a full manual mode of the DCCD, like the previous STI, with different center diff locking levels up to a straight-up 50/50 split. Combine that with traction control that offers a Trac mode that allows the wheels to slip a bit (the system can be turned off, too), and the STI's track attack prowess is better than ever.
I do wish Subaru had a hotted up version of the DI 2.0 from the WRX in here instead of the old 2.5 flat four, since the new motor is a sweetheart and the old mill is, well, it's basically 10 years old. That doesn't mean it isn't good and doesn't sound great, with a more distinct warble than the new one, it's just time to move to the next development. But the suspension tuning, steering, handling, transmission, seats, and outward appearance are all noticeable and welcome improvements compared to the already excellent new WRX
Because they're essentially the same performance as the STI from 7-8 years ago wrapped in a new body? With the same damn engine? It's a joke at this point.
I think that's a worthy trade.Thinking about dumping the evo and picking up a 135i.
Just kinda bored of the evo tbh.
GAF, I have a minor car issue, and I figured this would be the best thread to ask in instead of starting a new thread for one issue...
So, I've got a Hyundai Sonata 2010. Was working fine today, but tonight when I left work, I had issues with it.
When I put the key in and turned it, nothing happened...like it was completely dark, nothing turned on, I was pretty worried. I hadn't left the lights on, and I had just gotten a new battery literally a month ago.
Next time I put the key in, it worked, however I noticed it had "reset"...my radio stations for example switched back to the default, and the odometer switched to "Trip Mode". It was very weird.
The car seemed to be driving alright, and when I got home I switched it off, and then got it to turn on again without any issues, but I'm worried this is the tip of a much larger problem that will occur in the future.
From what I've googled, it may be an alternator? Also, could it perhaps be due to the weather? My car's been buried under a lot of snow this week, and then the weather quickly switched to like 60 degrees and everything melted, could water be damaging the inside?
Saw my first Corvette C7 on the road today... damn I want one now.
Saw my first Corvette C7 on the road today... damn I want one now.
Just playing devil's advocate here, but couldn't the same be said for the EVO? Weren't older evos (4-6) also faster than cedia based evos?
How much would it cost to get an aftermarket bumper painted? Just the front bumper which I wanna change out.
$300+ depending on the shop, whats the car?
For 70k you can't beat it... can't wait for Z06
The quietness around LaFerrari has me wondering,,,,
Thinking about dumping the evo and picking up a 135i.
Just kinda bored of the evo tbh.
Just ordered a 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee with Lux II package and Navigation for $39,750. MSRP was 43,590 (Dealer Invoice is 41,492 so I got about so I feel I did pretty well).
They also gave me more than I thought I would get on my trade in. They gave me 8100, when I thought I wouldnt get over 7500 since the car was in an accident a couple years ago.
Pictures to come.... in six weeks
wow sounds like a great deal....
So I'm beginning the process of replacing my car. Since 2008 I have had a 2004 Hyundai Accent I got in college. It's had some issues that I guess are consistent with a car now at 107k miles. But it is becoming increasingly difficult putting more money into it. With my new job as of last year, I depend on cars and reliability. My commute is long.... About 35 miles one way. I sometimes have to travel for work, although mostly if it planned I just get a rental.
No breakdowns at all but I feel the clock ticking. I am also increasingly wary of driving on the highway as the weeks go by. So.... Enter car shopping.
I'm looking at a few options. Because I rent so often, I have had a good opportunity to test different vehicles for extended periods. I especially enjoyed the Chevy Cruze and Mustang. Mustang is funny because it actually gets better gas mileage than my current Hyundai on the highway. Probably 80-90% of my driving is on the highway. I would also like some pop and power in acceleration to sometimes navigate around shit drivers.
I'm also considering the 2014 Mazda3. I haven't driven one but I did like the CX5. Hoping it would be a similar experience. I'm open to used but it would have to be the right of circumstances. For instance since the Mustang is getting a major platform change next year, I don't see the point of buying a new 2014. Cruze has been similar for a couple years now and is also due for a platform change, so there are a lot of used options there. Mazda3 just went through a big change and I would want one new. Other important information is that my credit is.... Challenged to say the least. Unfortunate reality, but that's the reality.
What are your opinions of some of these cars? Mazda3, V6 Mustang, Cruze? Also would maybe consider a Forte or similar. I think I'll give Hyundai a rest even though I'm sure they have improved since 2004.
Considering the miles you'll be putting on the car, seems like the Mazda3 or Cruze would be smarter than getting a Mustang, but obviously financially that's your call. I can't really talk, since I had a similar commute in high school and drove a Cadillac that got 17 or 18 mpg on the highway, though gas cost half as much then as it does now.So I'm beginning the process of replacing my car. Since 2008 I have had a 2004 Hyundai Accent I got in college. It's had some issues that I guess are consistent with a car now at 107k miles. But it is becoming increasingly difficult putting more money into it. With my new job as of last year, I depend on cars and reliability. My commute is long.... About 35 miles one way. I sometimes have to travel for work, although mostly if it planned I just get a rental.
No breakdowns at all but I feel the clock ticking. I am also increasingly wary of driving on the highway as the weeks go by. So.... Enter car shopping.
I'm looking at a few options. Because I rent so often, I have had a good opportunity to test different vehicles for extended periods. I especially enjoyed the Chevy Cruze and Mustang. Mustang is funny because it actually gets better gas mileage than my current Hyundai on the highway. Probably 80-90% of my driving is on the highway. I would also like some pop and power in acceleration to sometimes navigate around shit drivers.
I'm also considering the 2014 Mazda3. I haven't driven one but I did like the CX5. Hoping it would be a similar experience. I'm open to used but it would have to be the right of circumstances. For instance since the Mustang is getting a major platform change next year, I don't see the point of buying a new 2014. Cruze has been similar for a couple years now and is also due for a platform change, so there are a lot of used options there. Mazda3 just went through a big change and I would want one new. Other important information is that my credit is.... Challenged to say the least. Unfortunate reality, but that's the reality.
What are your opinions of some of these cars? Mazda3, V6 Mustang, Cruze? Also would maybe consider a Forte or similar. I think I'll give Hyundai a rest even though I'm sure they have improved since 2004.
Where do you live? Does it snow? If it does, no Mustang.
My choice would be a Mustang, but I have a bias towards the sportiest car...it's also totally different than a Mazda3 or Cruze, because it's a 2-door, RWD car.
If you liked the CX5, you'll love the Mazda3 - it's a lighter, better balanced, better handling, and considerably quicker car, based on a similar platform. IMO, I'd get a Mazda3 with the 2.5L 185HP engine.
No snow. Just sun and rain here in the central Florida area. Just expense wise for the Mazda, I'd stick with the base engine, though, and instead opt for the technology package. Good to know that the Mazda3 shares a lot and improves upon the CX5. I had the Cruze for like a week and thought that was really fun to drive too.Where do you live? Does it snow? If it does, no Mustang.
My choice would be a Mustang, but I have a bias towards the sportiest car...it's also totally different than a Mazda3 or Cruze, because it's a 2-door, RWD car.
If you liked the CX5, you'll love the Mazda3 - it's a lighter, better balanced, better handling, and considerably quicker car, based on a similar platform. IMO, I'd get a Mazda3 with the 2.5L 185HP engine.
Yeah just pure gas mileage wise, the Cruze and 3 are clear and above. Mustang enters only because I want some power even if it is just the V6, and I still get slightly better highway mileage than my current Hyundai. 29-30 mpg in actual use isn't bad at all. And especially for the 2013, they look damn nice. Just a bit wary because of the new platform for 2015.Considering the miles you'll be putting on the car, seems like the Mazda3 or Cruze would be smarter than getting a Mustang, but obviously financially that's your call. I can't really talk, since I had a similar commute in high school and drove a Cadillac that got 17 or 18 mpg on the highway, though gas cost half as much then as it does now.
Haha I'd go for the sedan. Not really a hatchback person although I guess it would be more functional. I'm basically married lol, but I actually think the new 2014 design is really nice.Mazda 3 also gets crazy good gas mileage and feels about 10k more expensive than it really is. Problem is that the hatchback is wildly overpriced and the sedan is a cockblocker aesthetically. If you're married and dead inside, sedan makes much more sense.
I love my car but fuck me, the servicing and repairs (which were partly due to my own ignorance) are beginning to piss me off.
Just had the steady amber malfunction indicator light up on the dash board. I know where are plenty of current or previous 350z owners on here, any advice on whether it's safe to do the manual diagnosis (pedal dance) and ecu reset? Any potential pitfalls?
I only plan on doing the diagnosis for my own knowledge so when I do take it in next week, they don't try and charge me for a repair that's not needed.
No snow. Just sun and rain here in the central Florida area. Just expense wise for the Mazda, I'd stick with the base engine, though, and instead opt for the technology package. Good to know that the Mazda3 shares a lot and improves upon the CX5. I had the Cruze for like a week and thought that was really fun to drive too.
Yeah just pure gas mileage wise, the Cruze and 3 are clear and above. Mustang enters only because I want some power even if it is just the V6, and I still get slightly better highway mileage than my current Hyundai. 29-30 mpg in actual use isn't bad at all. And especially for the 2013, they look damn nice. Just a bit wary because of the new platform for 2015.
Haha I'd go for the sedan. Not really a hatchback person although I guess it would be more functional. I'm basically married lol, but I actually think the new 2014 design is really nice.
I actually think aesthetically, it's Mustang first, then Mazda3, then in a clear third, the Cruze.
I love my car but fuck me, the servicing and repairs (which were partly due to my own ignorance) are beginning to piss me off.
Just had the steady amber malfunction indicator light up on the dash board. I know where are plenty of current or previous 350z owners on here, any advice on whether it's safe to do the manual diagnosis (pedal dance) and ecu reset? Any potential pitfalls?
I only plan on doing the diagnosis for my own knowledge so when I do take it in next week, they don't try and charge me for a repair that's not needed.
someone i know just bought an m235i today.
someone i know just bought an m235i today.
Pictures of the facelifted Ford Focus:
http://o.aolcdn.com/dims-global/dim.../244/325/7/S2443257/slug/l/focus-leak02-1.jpg
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2014-...photo-2443256/
The interior is much simpler and nicer now. three spoked wheel though.. I hate them.
Oh shit, dude. Yeah, I'm also in central Florida. Bought a house in Windermere. Get the Mustang, man. Since the traffic is fairly light here, you'll never have to worry about poor gas mileage as a result of hectic city traffic. My Jaguar and Infiniti both have ginormous V8s (a 5.0 and a 5.6L) that make over 400HP each. The M56S averages 24MPG...that's astounding for a car that weighs 4000lbs. The Mustang V6 is a pretty fuel efficient car for being a sporty coupe, and you'll easily average 28-30MPG. Trust me.
So get the Mustang and enjoy it.
nice. looks sleek and not as big/heavy as a 4 series.
Oh, nice. I'm in the less notorious part of MetroWest lol. And yeah driving wise, I work in Lakeland actually and my job is directly off the highway - so only city traffic is 2 miles on Kirkman to get to I-4, which then is about a 40 mile trek... I'm seeing some premium 2013 V6 models in the 16-17k range. LTZ Cruze at about 15-17k range and the new Mazda3 at around 18-19k for the i Touring trim. I may actually skip the technology package because it does look.... aftermarket. If that's the case I guess I could install an aftermarket HUD cheaper somewhere else.
Pictures of the facelifted Ford Focus:
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2014-ford-focus-facelift-leaked-images/med/#photo-2443256/
The interior is much simpler and nicer now. three spoked wheel though.. I hate them.
Hahaha, that's what you'd think, right? M235i weighs 3500+ lbs. LOL FAT
. :
Well.. Shit :x
Oh, nice. I'm in the less notorious part of MetroWest lol. And yeah driving wise, I work in Lakeland actually and my job is directly off the highway - so only city traffic is 2 miles on Kirkman to get to I-4, which then is about a 40 mile trek... I'm seeing some premium 2013 V6 models in the 16-17k range. LTZ Cruze at about 15-17k range and the new Mazda3 at around 18-19k for the i Touring trim. I may actually skip the technology package because it does look.... aftermarket. If that's the case I guess I could install an aftermarket HUD cheaper somewhere else.
Well.. Shit :x