And it's these areas that are surely of supreme importance to Microsoft - the raison d'être of its Xbox ambition. If, in 2010, the leading next generation console had a Windows-based development environment and operating system underlying it, and a Microsoft-controlled (and tithed) digital distribution network sitting on top, would it really matter to Microsoft if a Sony or Nintendo badge were on the front?
Making hardware is likely a short-term play - owning the de facto standard software that powers the hardware is the point. Microsoft can't allow another company to make a land grab that threatens its dominance as the platform for software in the living room, no more than it can in IT departments.
Xbox 360 isn't life and death for Microsoft: it's much more important than that.
Seriously?Iamthegamer said:Very good articles. They provide the perspectives of each company's approach very well. I especially liked this bit about Microsoft
I never thought about it that way, good job on the writer's part.
If the Revolution is quashed, the first platform to host all Nintendo's games could also be its last.
Rahul said:Meh articles with nothing new to think about, the only decent thing about them was that they weren't particularly biased. Until this, that is:
Which in one sentence proves the author doesn't know what he's talking about.
Good try! Come back next time.
Doube D said:Why? It's called REALITY. Nintendo hasn't earned jack from the console end of things. If the revolution is also a failure, then what reason do they have to build further consoles. Sure they will continue to produce hand helds and will continue to have plenty of money in the bank... so what? The shareholders will tell them to start going software only ASAP.
Doube D said:Why? It's called REALITY. Nintendo hasn't earned jack from the console end of things. If the revolution is also a failure, then what reason do they have to build further consoles. Sure they will continue to produce hand helds and will continue to have plenty of money in the bank... so what? The shareholders will tell them to start going software only ASAP.
Rahul said:Good try! Come back next time.
Iamthegamer said:I never thought about it that way, good job on the writer's part.
Doube D said:Why? It's called REALITY. Sony hasn't earned jack from the console end of things. If the PS3 is also a failure, then what reason do they have to build further consoles. Sure they will continue to produce movies and will continue to have zero money in the bank... so what? The shareholders will tell them to start going software only ASAP.
Nintendo has been tinkering and scheming up online plans for the good part of the last two decades, to totally disregard this and consider it as a "Compromise" is ridiculous.
As if that's some standard to adhere to? Even Steve Kent is no "Steve Kent", by that logic.littlewig said:This guy is no Steve Kent.
Holy shit, what is that even based on? Nintendo has been researching online gaming before it even existed and maintained a "online gaming is a fad" ruse until now?!
Yep,there would be an army of angry Xbots who would snub Microsoft if they left then tried to come back into the console market.sangreal said:I was under the impression that everyone thought about that. But really, it isn't going to happen. The console world just doesn't work that way. If Nintendo and Sony adopted a Microsoft platform for a generation there is nothing stopping them from dropping it the next generation and Microsoft would be back to square one.
Luckett_X said:Holy shit, what is that even based on? Nintendo has been researching online gaming before it even existed and maintained a "online gaming is a fad" ruse until now?!
I know the hive needs protecting but fuck! Calm down angry wasp!
And Famicom Modem. And 64DD. And Mobile GB.Rahul said:Say hello to Satellaview!
jarrod said:And Famicom Modem. And 64DD. And Mobile GB.
Nintendo's had more "online" game machines that Sony and Microsoft combined.
True... I should be getting back to Mario Golf GBA anyway.Musashi Wins! said:It's horribly embarassing when you guys bring up these services. But not in the way you intend. Don't jarrod, don't!![]()
God's Hand said:Live is the standard for online gaming and if Nintendo can offer a reasonably comparable service for free, that's great.
TheInkyVoid said:Oh please!
MS's online service is sooo great they can't even get more than %10 of the installed base to sign up for it. And that's being very gracious and taking MS's claimed online subscriber numbers at face value.
And now with the 360 MS has had to turn to giving away part of the service for free.
MS's online service is a legend in Xbox fans' own minds.
but the attempts fail in comparison to Xbox Live.
TheInkyVoid said:Oh please!
MS's online service is sooo great they can't even get more than %10 of the installed base to sign up for it. And that's being very gracious and taking MS's claimed online subscriber numbers at face value.
And now with the 360 MS has had to turn to giving away part of the service for free.
MS's online service is a legend in Xbox fans' own minds.
TheInkyVoid said:Oh please!
MS's online service is sooo great they can't even get more than %10 of the installed base to sign up for it. And that's being very gracious and taking MS's claimed online subscriber numbers at face value.
And now with the 360 MS has had to turn to giving away part of the service for free.
MS's online service is a legend in Xbox fans' own minds.
Agent Icebeezy said:If Nintendo and Sony had excepted the Windows platform on the PS2 and Nintendo on the GC, the Xbox would have never existed.
Prine said:You totally missed the point that you need broadband and credit card on top of an Xbox to play online. 10 percent is a great foundation on which to build upon, its a percentage which encourages big developers from the west and east to look at Xbox as their lead platform for online development. MS managed to get some great Japanese titles online. Games like Tekki, Phantom Dust, DOA, Winning Eleven and now (what fans have been waiting for) Ridge Racer 6.
I think you're being incredibly shortsighted
Link316 said:Sony & Nintendo shouldn't have to accept something that they don't need
so in your opinion, Nintendo shouldn't jump in on the online bandwagon until they can be assured of mass market penetration? forget about building a foundation and working their way up, learning, growing, expanding and building its brand name. it's either everything (everyone) or nothing? all at once. i love the hives rationalization of everything. :lol it's like he's saying he's glad Nintendo's not online because MSFT ony has 10% of it's userbase online. as if he's personally happy about not being online.TheInkyVoid said:Oh please!
MS's online service is sooo great they can't even get more than %10 of the installed base to sign up for it. And that's being very gracious and taking MS's claimed online subscriber numbers at face value.
And now with the 360 MS has had to turn to giving away part of the service for free.
MS's online service is a legend in Xbox fans' own minds.
shpankey said:so in your opinion, Nintendo shouldn't jump in on the online bandwagon until they can be assured of mass market penetration?
shpankey said:what's to lose? they don't have to do a Live right now... they could just do what Sony does at least. they don't need central servers etc... let developers do their own thing... allow users to host their own games etc.