Also, in regards to sexual preference being merely social, I don't agree that it's "all social" but things like this...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WG7U1QsUd1g
...illustrate that there is some social aspects involved in what people see as beautiful vs not. Now, I'm not saying any of this relates to you or your preferences at all. I'm just saying it's better to just do what you did in your earlier posts where you described physical characteristics you liked/didn't like vs saying something like "I don't like white men" or any blanket statement, which I really don't get the defense for anyway. Other than just being easier to type out, there's no advantage to it vs the other if, for example, you're on a dating app trying to tell all darker skin women not to approach you, type out "I don't like black women" on your profile, and then get upset when a woman from Bangladesh tries to hit you up.
I can only speak for myself,
but I've been seeing this argument for a minute on this forum and it gets old after a while. If posters show up saying "let's talk about comics", I have no problem dropping it, especially when I want no part of criticizing Cindi for her legitimate preferences once this semantics discussion is over with.
Now that I'm home and at a keyboard....
I believe the "natural" sexual preference is for partners who are broadly similar to oneself, in good physical condition, and in control of good resources, especially for women. Men tend to be more open to any mating opportunity, and to be less choosy. Any narrow preference for a particular type of sexual object, I tend to view as a form of culturally conditioned fetishism brought about by prior experiences, whether it be blond hair, red shoes or rubber gloves.
The question is an interesting one. The short answer is: probably yes [it is determined by evolution] but we don't know for sure. We do know that virtually all psychological characteristics that have been studies are to some extent heritable. In fact, my own research shows that, compared with genetically nonidentical twins, genetically identical twins have more similar sexual and romantic partner preferences, which indicates that genes play a role in those preferences. No one has looked specifically for genetic influences on sexual preferences for different races, but I see no reason why this would not be to some extent heritable as well. It is important to note that 'to some extent heritable' does not mean that these preferences are 'biologically determined', only that genes play some role along with environmental influences which could include upbringing and cultural prejudices.
See? I can oversimplify the article to make an overly reductionist talking point too!
It's interesting that you wholly ignore that the article posits that evolution and genetics
do play a part in picking a mate. Harson's claim was that racial preference in picking mates is
purely social. I never claimed, not once, that attraction to one's own race is only a genetic asset - because of course it isn't. However, one could be pretty hard pressed to come to the conclusion that the answer lies somewhere in the middle.
What did I say that was wrong? I've seen countless white men, and very few do anything for me. I know my sexual preferences, and it largely tends to be a black man. My examples were mostly overly simplified, because that's what talking about racial physical characteristics is at a base level: an over simplification. However, it does have some truth. White people do tend to have thinner noses, thinner lips, paler skin. Is this a blanket statement? Yes. Does it mean that all white men have these features? No. But an overwhelmingly amount of White American's do have these features, and combined with socialization with white men, it's rare for me to wooed by one. Much like how Asians tend to have flat noses, and African's
tend to have black hair. Are there exceptions? Oh yeah, but exceptions don't take away from the general rule of basic observation. Further, it takes a very, very atypical white man to attract me.
Also, you're using absolutes. I would never say in an online dating profile, for instance, "No white men." To do so would be exclusionary and shallow, as well as discriminatory. I do not discriminate, but I do have preferences. So I'm more likely to ignore a white man's messages - and they have given me much reason to ignore their messages - than a black man's. What originally sparked this was me saying I'm going to be looking into dating interracially, with the exception of with white men. To be honest, I don't want to date interracially period as it adds complication to my already complicated life. However, the dating scene is so dire that I must as a necessity. That's all. I also included an addendum that I'm mostly willing to be courted by men of color, and not white men. Comparing me saying,"I'm not attracted to white men" in this thread, on a video game forum, to me putting "No White Men" in an online dating profile is quite a reach.
I'll keep my mind open, and if there's a white man that is very, very atypical and has an interest in me, I'll go for it. But that doesn't mean I have to actively pursue it, and why should I? I don't find white men physically attractive for the most part, and having a white man as a partner - something I've had before and did not like - adds an entirely new level of stress.