Back to The Bridge. In the first season, you were somewhat constrained by the trappings of the original Scandinavian seriesthe hunt for the serial killerbut now, youre free of that. Is it liberating?
For sure, and Im sure it is for the writers, as well. I feel like now were able to really explore the characters more, as opposed to finding the serial killer. The biggest challenge for everyone was how to follow the original show but also create our own world, and now that were done with that storyline we can branch out. The story is much more complex, which makes for a greater challenge. The first few episodes, you try to figure out how this all fits together, and in the second half of the season, everything will come together.
Elwood sent a note out to critics that came off as apologetic for Season 1, admitting that the serial killer through-line was limiting, and explaining how Season 2 is about the more interesting aspect of the show exploring the shadow world of the border between El Paso and Juarez.
Well, the reality of all of these stories, especially when it comes to the Lost Girls of Juarez, is that we cant really solve the mystery because no one fully knows whats going on. On our show, most of our storylines are based on real-life events and real-life people, so were trying to shine a light on the situation thats happening the best way that we can.
The Bridges co-showrunner, Meredith Stiehm, left to go back to Homeland. How did her absence affect the show in Season 2?
As far as us actors are concerned, now its more one voice, and theres one person you can approach to get answers from. I think the show benefits generally from a clear vision. As with anything, if you have multiple opinions or multiple tastes, the show goes one direction and then is pulled in another, so we benefit. Theres more coherence in what our characters are.