The colors of this photo will appear different to everyone. I think?

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's because it is white and gold and anyone saying it's anything else is trolling. I have to say this is the most elaborate and wide-spread trolling I have ever seen. But no matter what you do with your screen settings or room lightning or anything else, a white pixel in a picture will not turn blue or a gold pixel black.

Its just your perception of it. Really, its possible for it to change.
 
Without any context I saw the picture and it was White and Gold, I mean undeniably so to my perception.

Even with all the subsequent comparisons and contrasts and logical explanations it look white and gold to me.

A few minutes ago I went to the Buzzfeed article and it was blue and gold-ish brown. I went off the page and came back a few minutes later and it was back to white and gold.

I don't even know anymore.
 
And you missed the point if you think I'm talking about color blindness (though it can factor in).

Color separation is an art of your mind, for all humans. I have been trained on this in a scientific context in university (though as a designer... I am not a researcher myself).

After the image has been processed by your eye (so this is not color blindness we're talking about here), your brain has to make artistic (not objective) decisions about how to draw lines between colors. And these lines might be rather arbitrary... Derived from cultural context among other things.

People draw different lines between color categories and it has nothing to do with how "accurate" certain peoples' eyes are.
Well, why did you bring up the color blindness test then? So you're now in agreement that it's a post-processing optical illusion then? Because the hypothesis I was disagreeing with was talking about sensitivity. How did I miss the point if you're now saying the same thing I was the whole time?
 
I can accept some people seeing blue (I mean, it is "blue" but I believe that's because of the shadow) but how does anyone see black here?
The photo is overexposed. Yes, the colour in the photo is brownish, but it's just washed out due to the terrible photography.
 
When I first saw it, it was gold/slightly blue white. Then I read a few pages and went back to it, and it was black/blue.

deZSp7b.gif
 
I see no difference whatsoever between OP and the photo from Wired. Are you relying on intuition, or did you check it with Photoshop or something?

Intuition confirmed with PS sir :). Probably saved their color space ($40 says it was "monitor RGB")
I made a gif (256 colors good enough to illustrate the difference).

ibeIcMkj7cdWL8.gif


Also it should help people who are seeing white, see the blue that others are seeing.

Though some people are saying they see the blue and black like the dress looks on the store page...I'm not seeing that at ALL.
 
Well, why did you bring up the color blindness test then? So you're now in agreement that it's a post-processing optical illusion then? Because the hypothesis I was disagreeing with was talking about sensitivity. How did I miss the point if you're now saying the same thing I was the whole time?

Cause my only point is that people perceive color differently regardless of whether it is the physical eye or psychological. It's both.
 
White and gold when I first woke up, looking on my phone. Black and blue when I got to work.. looked back on my phone and it's now black and blue there as well
wtzgU.gif
 
That's because it is white and gold and anyone saying it's anything else is trolling. I have to say this is the most elaborate and wide-spread trolling I have ever seen. But no matter what you do with your screen settings or room lightning or anything else, a white pixel in a picture will not turn blue or a gold pixel black.

Where is the blue in the image coming from? Where in a retail store have you ever seen a blue spotlight?

I wonder if this going to end up being some kind of major revelation about how poor some people's monitors are at color reproduction.
 
The shadow is cool making it look blue. The gold is brown or something, how can it be black it's too bright in that shade. No direct light is bleaching it's darkness like the stuff in the background.
 
The shadow is cool making it look blue. The gold is brown or something, how can it be black it's too bright in that shade. No direct light is bleaching it's darkness like the stuff in the background.

Why would a shadow be blue indoors? Where is the blue coming from?
 
Just curious, does this make any difference?:

b0qXEU

This is the first thing that has demonstrated to me that it can be perceived as white. When the dress is at the absolute darkest blue, the contrast makes the jacket/shoulder part seem white with a very slight blue tint because of the contrast. I still see it as blue when the image fades to it's original color, also during most of the fade. I can't see the entire thing as white without the stark contrast of the manipulated image.
 
Why would a shadow be blue indoors? Where is the blue coming from?

The whole picture just looks like bad lighting which makes it hard to judge what color it is. It looks blue but because of how messed up the picture is I wouldn't doubt the real thing is brighter and whiter, or for that matter bluer and blacker.

Tried to find a better example, but imagine if less of the bright rays of light reflected on the white spots of this cloth, it would look like a dull blue color.

 
I saw it as white and gold at first, then I covered over the background of the pic with my hands and watched it transform to blue and black in real time. Then I lost my concentration and looked back and it was white. Trippy stuff.
 
I should probably just be thankful that my eyes are seeing the image as the object actually is in real life (blue/black), but it does annoy me that I can't trigger the optical illusion that makes people see white and gold.

Knowing it is blue/black in real life it would piss me off if my eyes could only see white/gold. Still I always sucked at those magic eye poster tricks and it looks like I can't pull off the white/gold optical illusion either unless someone comes up with a method to trigger it.

So it would be fun if someone who can see both comes up with a reliable method to get the image to change at will. With the magic eye posters it was always unfocus your eyes and move the image slowly away from your face.
 
The whole picture just looks like bad lighting which makes it hard to judge what color it is. It looks blue but because of how messed up the picture is I wouldn't doubt the real thing is brighter and whiter, or for that matter bluer and blacker.

Everything in the image has a yellow haze to it, including the floor and the black and white object behind the dress to the left. There actually isn't anything in that image that's black - even in shadow. It's all yellow.

And yellow is the opposite of blue, btw.
 
This thread... Is a metaphor for differences of opinion in all OT and review threads.

Except this topic is actually important.
 
I should probably just be thankful that my eyes are seeing the image as the object actually is in real life (blue/black), but it does annoy me that I can't trigger the optical illusion that makes people see white and gold.

Knowing it is blue/black in real life it would piss me off if my eyes could only see white/gold. Still I always sucked at those magic eye poster tricks and it looks like I can't pull off the white/gold optical illusion either unless someone comes up with a method to trigger it.

So it would be fun if someone who can see both comes up with a reliable method to get the image to change at will. With the magic eye posters it was always unfocus your eyes and move the image slowly away from your face.

But... the image itself is overexposed and is gold and blue.

Seeing any black at all is your eyes playing tricks on you, it doesn't matter what the actual dress is, it matters what the digital image is.
 
I've read the OP over a million times and I don't get it.
We are talking about the dress right? It's blue and black. Are you saying if I send that photo to some of my friends they might say it is fucking white and gold?
 
I've read the OP over a million times and I don't get it.
We are talking about the dress right? It's blue and black. Are you saying if I send that photo to some of my friends they might say it is fucking white and gold?

At first glance I saw white/gold then read some GAF comments - scrolled up it's now blue/black. I'm tripping out right now.
 
So the people seeing it black and blue, do you see the dress as being in the same brightness as the other things? I'm thinking that's the difference, and I can't make myself to see it as not in the shade.
 
Everything in the image has a yellow haze to it, including the floor and the black and white object behind the dress to the left. There actually isn't anything in that image that's black - even in shadow. It's all yellow.

And yellow is the opposite of blue, btw.

There are hints of blue fading in the upper right corner and a bit down the right side from that corner fading into whatever that object is (which appear to be a dark color). This picture is too messed up to judge anything and our brains are correcting it to be one way or another.

What I actually see : Blue and brown/goldish color

What it most likely is: Blue and Black

What it could also be: White and brown/gold/orange with skittles in the picket.
 
The gold is one thing, it's obvious the photo is terribly lighted so there's this goldish/yellowish hue that will make the black appear more like a dark gold than a true black. The idea that some people can't see the obvious blue though is what's really tripping me out.
 
The gold is one thing, it's obvious the photo is terribly lighted so there's this goldish/yellowish hue that will make the black appear more like a dark gold than a true black. The idea that some people can't see the obvious blue though is what's really tripping me out.
The blue is easily mistaken for a shadow. Just looks like a blue tinged shadow on white.
 
There are hints of blue fading in the upper right corner. This picture is too messed up to judge anything and our brains are correcting it to be one way or another.

That's the complete opposite angle, though. Look at the floor. It's completely bathed in yellow light.
 
Do some people actually see it as dark blue and black as it looks in the store page? Because if so that's just fucked up. I mean I can see it as overexposed black and blue when I focus on the background but to see it as it actually is? No way man.
 
Do some people actually see it as dark blue and black as it looks in the store page? Because if so that's just fucked up. I mean I can see it as overexposed black and blue when I focus on the background but to see it as it actually is? No way man.

I see the brownish tinge to the black stripes but I know that's a factor of the shitty camera. It's a blue and black dress. I mean either that, or it's a blue and brown dress which just makes no goddamn sense.
 
thought everyone was just trolling who said that it's white and gold.

Now I've read an article that basically states that people use color correction. Some tend to leave golden colors out, some leave blue colors out. And all this correction happens because people are used to see things under different daytime conditions and therefore correct all colors in regards of the time / lighting.

Guess the guys who see it as blue / black are childs of the night. Because we don't care about color correction or daytime / lighting.
 
Convert them, convert them all. It would not be safe to work amongst them otherwise, their judgement is impaired.
I have sympathy though, I was one of them once.

Showed one guy on my phone, he swore white and gold. He looked it up on his monitor and had the 'shit, it's black and blue' moment and now when he looks at my phone he sees black and blue. We've let him in our camp, but tied him up until we're certain he's legit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom