So is this whole thing a giant troll?
honestly, its not. I showed it to my coworkers who had no idea about it last night they saw mostly white and gold but a few saw blue and black.
So is this whole thing a giant troll?
In Vietnamese, blue and green are considered shades of the same color (basically the name for green is either "blue", or "plant leaf blue" when there is a need to differentiate from normal blue). English-speaking people sometimes shorten this idea as "The Vietnamese don't see the difference between blue and green", even though they definitely do. So I wonder if Himba people really struggle for this.
![]()
People who see it as white and gold, this is what is happening. Your brain is interpreting the light part of the dress as being white with a cool shade. Your brain is overcompensating on this. Just like how this house is white and navy, but if you really looked the image colour palette, it is actually just light blue. You just understand that it's only the lighting that is doing that. I ask you what colour it is, you will say white and navy.
People who see it as Blue and Black, you are NOT really seeing black, that is the illusion. Zoom in, look at the palette, you are seeing the brown as black because your brain thinks the brighter part of the image should be a darker blue.
This is why when you see the original dress, its saturated dark blue doesn't surprise you. The actual image doesn't have that colour, but that is what your brain interprets.
It is fascinating. The choices White And Gold, Blue And Black, coupled with knowledge of what it actually is and knowledge of what exposure does, is causing such a heated argument.
"How is it white?"
"How is it black?"
We never hear, "how is it blue?"
Or, "How is it gold?"
The illusion is whether or not our brains decide to assume the light blue should be darker or lighter in better lighting.
My GF is on Black and Blue and from this thread I know it is very hard to see it the other way if that is what she sees the first time, but at the very least I was able to make her understand that the Black lace she sees is not the actual colour.
I think seeing Blue and Brown is important to understanding that it can be seen another way.
It's not about convincing yourself, or trying to understand how the colours can be different. You will be able to see it differently, and when it does you won't be able to explain it. Blue and Black have more scientific backing and they swear by it far more than White and Gold.
I think this is because we are used to calling dark colours "blacks" more in society, as we rarely get to see actual black. Making us less sensitive to changes in dark colours.
Nice writeup.
I still see gold and white.
What is fucking my brain is how someone can see gold, while someone else sees black. Those don't even seem close.
**** UPDATE to prove this theory I turned my phone brightness from the lowest to highest and saw it switching from white and gold (at the lowest) to light blue and darker gold (at the highest) meaning people that see blue and black are more sensitive to light (better eyesight and not looking at the sun like your moms told you)
Nope.I see light blue dress and brown lace in the first picture and black lace blue dress in the 2nd
Am i mad?
Indeed, they have no idea what they're talking about. Claiming to see relief in the retina.. whuut haha.I see blue and black/dark brown. Funny thing to me is this bit:
Better eyesight yet I use contacts that are -7.5 (can't see shit without my glasses)
It's black shiny fabric under a yellow tinged light source. What people are calling gold is the yellow light bouncing off of it. No one actually thinks the RGB value of the trim is actually black.
edit for clarity: The contention arises from people not realising that the light source is yellow tinged / over exposure shifted the image yellow. What people are looking at is blue shifted towards white / yellow. What a lot of people are mistakenly doing is thinking they're looking at white but shifted blue.
Nice writeup.
I still see gold and white.
What is fucking my brain is how someone can see gold, while someone else sees black. Those don't even seem close.
I see blue and black/dark brown. Funny thing to me is this bit:
Better eyesight yet I use contacts that are -7.5 (can't see shit without my glasses)
It's not about understanding, otherwise I wouldn't be able to switch like a few other gaffers here. You are trying to explain what the exposure is doing, but you're missing the point of the illusion.
It helps people understand how the dress could be bright blue and dark black under a bright light. I'd say the illusion is connected to the way you see the situation: dress in full bright light or dress in shadow. In full bright light you have to compensate for reflections (gold) and darker colors getting lighter, in shadows you have to do.. sort of.. the opposite. I don't know how to see it as a super brightly lit dress on a processing level, only a dress in shadow.It's not about understanding, otherwise I wouldn't be able to switch like a few other gaffers here. You are trying to explain what the exposure is doing, but you're missing the point of the illusion.
People who can switch back and forth are just tricking their own brain into ignoring the visual data in the image. There is no information in the image that indicates a possibility of the dress actually being white. And it's not really an illusion. It's just an over exposed picture. People are honestly just thinking so hard about it that it's fucking with their perception. >.<
How do we know it's the same dress and not just the same model in different colors?So, let me get this straight.
Fact 1: The original dress colors are royal blue and black.
Fact 2: In the photo of the dress, it is light-blue and gold-brown.
What is being discussed is people see the photo of the dress in different colors depending on:
a) their screen (how it is calibrated and at which angle they're looking);
b) how their brain are processing the image (optical illusion).
For an example of b) see: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=153875429#post153875429
- The tile B is dark-gray but your brain process it as light-gray for reasons.
- The dress in the photo is light-blue/gold-brown but your brain process it as white/gold or blue/black for reasons.
Is that it?
Anyway, I'm more curious now about how long will this meme last. =P
Wow, this thread blew up.
I see white and gold.
People can't trick their brains. When you can see it both ways you will know.
It's completely a involuntary thing. The only people who are not tricked are those who clearly see light blue and brown.
I await your reaction. Gotta go Uni.![]()
So, let me get this straight.
Fact 1: The original dress colors are royal blue and black.
Fact 2: In the photo of the dress, it is light-blue and gold-brown.
What is being discussed is people see the photo of the dress in different colors depending on:
a) their screen (how it is calibrated and at which angle they're looking);
b) how their brain are processing the image (optical illusion).
For an example of b) see: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=153875429#post153875429
- The tile B is dark-gray but your brain process it as light-gray for reasons.
- The dress in the photo is light-blue/gold-brown but your brain process it as white/gold or blue/black for reasons.
Is that it?
Anyway, I'm more curious now about how long will this meme last. =P
How do we know it's the same dress and not just the same model in different colors?
Just curious, does this make any difference?:
![]()