runlikehell
Banned
Book 4.5 eh... I'm excited.
ronito said:so I've made it to the seventh book.
I'm up to the point whereand really it's sorta hard not to just put this down for good. I can't help but that King is just fucking with me. I got the same feeling from Wizard and Glass a "oh come on man." kind of feeling. The first book I consider to be King's best work. The drawing of the three was also pretty good. But sometimes I keep thinking that King's editor might've been better off saying "No. This is dumb." But by now I've spent too much getting involved in the series to stop.Jake is looking for Susana and singing "The lion sleeps tonight"
The comics cover stuff not in the books mainly. Get the actual books.Philooch said:i like the art of the marvel ones but are those just comics are the whole book with pictures?
xxracerxx said:The comics cover stuff not in the books mainly. Get the actual books.
ronito said:so I've made it to the seventh book.
I'm up to the point whereand really it's sorta hard not to just put this down for good. I can't help but that King is just fucking with me. I got the same feeling from Wizard and Glass a "oh come on man." kind of feeling. The first book I consider to be King's best work. The drawing of the three was also pretty good. But sometimes I keep thinking that King's editor might've been better off saying "No. This is dumb." But by now I've spent too much getting involved in the series to stop.Jake is looking for Susana and singing "The lion sleeps tonight"
Pretty much sums up my feelings on the matter.DiscoNaldo said:
Mockingbird said:2. I noticed there is a revised edition. Is this better than the original? as someone who has never read anything from this series, would you recommend starting with the revised one or the og (provided it's on kindle)?
Mockingbird said:Ok, finished reading the first book -- which would seem many consider to be the best book. It was good, but I didn't think it was great. I kind of one big spoiler, and after hearing how the other books aren't as good as the first, I don't think I'll be continuing this series --- at least I don't want to buy it on my kindle. Might check it out of the library if I really want to read something.
darksnowman said:When I first read the Gunslinger (unrevised), I thought it was a slog and difficult to get into. However, reaching the final part - the palavar - I became absolutely hooked and started The Drawing of the Three straight away, and had The Wastelands read the week after. Roland and Mid-World have never been far from my thoughts for over a decade now. I'd say give TDotT a go and if you don't like it then give up on the series.
Things do get pretty mental during the final three volumes but considering the point SK was at in his real life, its understandable.
Atramental said:Well I just started reading the first book (revised) to see what all this fuss over the Dark Tower is about. Anything I should know before I begin this literary journey?
ArjanN said:IMO the quality of the books definately goes downhill near the end, but the first 3 books or so were good.
ArjanN said:IMO the quality of the books definately goes downhill near the end, but the first 3 books or so were good.
I found reading the prologue (which I read after the book, weirdly) compelled me to carry on with the series after enjoying the first but not really getting into it. When I read how much time he'd dedicated to it and the links it held to other books of his (I think I read Insomnia just before picking this up) I really wanted to see what happened and who would turn up.darksnowman said:When I first read the Gunslinger (unrevised), I thought it was a slog and difficult to get into. However, reaching the final part - the palavar - I became absolutely hooked and started The Drawing of the Three straight away, and had The Wastelands read the week after. Roland and Mid-World have never been far from my thoughts for over a decade now. I'd say give TDotT a go and if you don't like it then give up on the series.
Things do get pretty mental during the final three volumes but considering the point SK was at in his real life, its understandable.
Number45 said:When I read how much time he'd dedicated to it and the links it held to other books of his (I think I read Insomnia just before picking this up) I really wanted to see what happened and who would turn up.
darksnowman said:Insomnia was basically an unnumbered Dark Tower novel. However, due to SK's accident, the vast majority of everything that was set up in Insomnia went out the window when he penned vols 5-7.
Vlad said:How so?
Just finished reading Insomnia a month or so ago, and the big setup seemed to be thestuff, which pretty much jived exactly with what happened in the book. The only thing that I could see going out the window was RolandPatrick Danville.literally getting rid of his copy of the book
bengraven said:I think the film/TV series will never be made because of the Stephen King angle and the poor ending. Also the fact that the first film ends on a cliffhanger.
And that they are going to want to get to 7 movies and are worried some will work better than others.
bengraven said:I think the film/TV series will never be made because of the Stephen King angle and the poor ending. Also the fact that the first film ends on a cliffhanger.
And that they are going to want to get to 7 movies and are worried some will work better than others.
Vlad said:sequel to the books of sorts. Basically have the first establishing shot of Roland show him with his horn, so that readers of the book know that he's not on the same cycle that he was during the books. This way they can take whatever liberties they want with the main storyline (within reason) while having the explanation that it isn't the same run to the tower that was covered in the novels. Not only that, but there could also be more of a "final" ending by having Roland actually make it to the tower with the horn this time.
This is an amazing idea. You have my sword.Vlad said:Personally, I always thought that a good approach to the movies would be to make them a (spoilers for DT7)sequel to the books of sorts. Basically have the first establishing shot of Roland show him with his horn, so that readers of the book know that he's not on the same cycle that he was during the books. This way they can take whatever liberties they want with the main storyline (within reason) while having the explanation that it isn't the same run to the tower that was covered in the novels. Not only that, but there could also be more of a "final" ending by having Roland actually make it to the tower with the horn this time.
Starting a reread! Very excited. Just ordered WttK on Amazon, will read it in order chronologically.
I got up to Wizard and Glass many years ago and got about halfway before shelving it for some unknown reason. Maybe I wanted to wait until the next book was actually available.
Anyway, I haven't gone back to the series since, especially after hearing that books 5-7 were disappointing. Anyone care to talk me into returning? I'd probably start at Gunslinger again since I remember so little.
I got up to Wizard and Glass many years ago and got about halfway before shelving it for some unknown reason. Maybe I wanted to wait until the next book was actually available.
Anyway, I haven't gone back to the series since, especially after hearing that books 5-7 were disappointing. Anyone care to talk me into returning? I'd probably start at Gunslinger again since I remember so little.
Stephen King has been waiting a long time for "The Dark Tower" series to find a place on screens. "The Gunslinger," the first book in the series, was published in 1982, and he's returned to that science fiction/fantasy/horror/western world for almost 4,000 pages. More than once, it has looked like Hollywood would tackle the enormous cross-genre project. More than once, the project has been killed.
That's what happened Tuesday at Warner Bros., which passed on "The Dark Tower." Deadline reports, "After getting an overhauled script from Oscar winning scribe Akiva Goldsman, the studio just balked on the project that Ron Howard wants to direct with Brian Grazer, Goldsman and King producing, and with their A Beautiful Mind star Russell Crowe being eyed to play the gunman Roland Deschain."
If this sounds like a rerun, it is. The project -- packaged as three feature films and two limited-run television series -- was killed by Universal last summer. In July 2011, Universal, operating under Comcast's new, frugal ownership, announced it would not produce "The Dark Tower." In that iteration, Javier Bardem was set to star; as in this one, Brian Grazer was producing, Goldsman was scripting, and Ron Howard was directing. Howard and Grazer had worked on the project for a year before approaching King -- and then the bestselling author came on board as a producer.
"I've been waiting for the right team to bring the characters and stories in these books to film and TV viewers around the world," King had said in a statement, back when things at Universal were looking good. "Ron, Akiva, Brian [Grazer] along with Universal and NBC have a deep interest and passion for 'The Dark Tower' series and I know that will translate into an intriguing series of films and TV shows that respect the origins and the characters in 'The Dark Tower' that fans have come to love."
Fans have bought more than 30 million copies of "The Dark Tower" books. The most recent book in the series, "The Wind Through the Keyhole," came out in April of this year.
Maybe there is hope for them. Deadline has updated its report about Warner Bros.' passing with news that a new financier may have stepped in. Media Rights Capital, the company behind the surprise summer hit "Ted," is reportedly in talks to bring "The Dark Tower" to screens. Finally.
Warner Bros.’ planned adaptation of Stephen King’s massive The Dark Tower series has stalled. Last we heard, the studio passed on an elaborate plan that would have spread King’s story across multiple feature films and a television series. But even though the project’s on the shelf, that hasn’t stopped fans in high places from speculating on the franchise’s future.
Case in point: Breaking Bad Emmy winner Aaron Paul took to Twitter last night to claim that playing reformed junkie Eddie Dean in King’s story is a “HUGE dream of mine.” Those of us who’ve read King’s story promptly had our brains melted by the mere suggestion of Paul playing Eddie. It’s so perfect a casting choice that Damon Lindelof chimed in with the Tweet, “You would be the best Eddie ever.”
And he would. Dean is a New York junkie pulled into a fantasy world by rambling gunslinger Roland of Gilead. He’s a deeply flawed but ultimately heroic character, and he’s characterized by his bravery and sarcasm. Paul would be so perfect in the role. And as Breaking Bad has proven, this powerful actor easily could hold his own alongside Russell Crowe, Javier Bardem, or any other actor cast as Roland.
Unfortunately, as far as we know, the movie isn’t happening. The budget might have been too high. Ron Howard’s vision might have been too unwieldy. But King’s Dark Tower story is so amazing, you can understand why Hollywood’s reluctant to let it go. And with casting suggestions like Paul for Eddie, now I’m refusing to let it go, as well. How about you?
sorry to bump an old thread. I just wanted to hop in here and say that I finished book 7 last night and it completely destroyed me! I loved the ending and honestly I've been pretty somber all day thinking about it.
Oy's death really hit me hard =(