Are the comics canon?
Fair enough. I'll try to pick them up when I'm done with the series.I dont remember ever hearing any official word about it, but I would say so. I think the stories are straight from King + Robin Furth, the writer of the dark tower concordances, which are basically compendiums of all information regarding DT. Before he started writing the last 3 books, King needed her to go back and gather up all the information she could so that he'd have a reference for all the shit he didn't remember. Then the information she ended up compiling was so thorough that they went ahead and published it. So if it comes from her and/or King it's canon to me
About to finish Wizard and Glass...should I read The Wind Through the Keyhole next? Does it truly feel like Book 4's direct follow-up?
I love this idea.Personally, I always thought that a good approach to the movies would be to make them a (spoilers for DT7)sequel to the books of sorts. Basically have the first establishing shot of Roland show him with his horn, so that readers of the book know that he's not on the same cycle that he was during the books. This way they can take whatever liberties they want with the main storyline (within reason) while having the explanation that it isn't the same run to the tower that was covered in the novels. Not only that, but there could also be more of a "final" ending by having Roland actually make it to the tower with the horn this time.
Also, WTTK - good? Valid new entry in the series? I'm starting it this evening.
Also, WTTK - good? Valid new entry in the series? I'm starting it this evening.
I thought so too on first read, abandoned it after a hundred pages. Picked it up again a few months later, started from scratch and steamed through it. Didn't look back, read all seven within the space of a year.Tried reading it, didn't really liked it. Came off as something really pretentious and overly dark. Maybe it gets better in sequels, but if i don't like first one, what's the point.
Wttk is good. Book 7 is also pretty good compared to the previous two books. Still, King felt forced to finish the Dark Tower in his lifetime so he kind of rushed them out. Wonder what they'd be like if he wrote the last couple of books now...
Song of Susannah and the beginning of DT7 dragged horribly for me. Was really worried the series was limping to a conclusion, but I loved the ending. Really, really loved it. Didn't see it coming and I thought it was the perfect way to round the saga off.
I hated the painter guy that was randomly introduced in DT7 and played an undeservedly-big role in the climax.
Yeah his weakest skill is endings (Gerald's Game, Under the Dome, even The Stand to a large extent greatly disappointed me) and yet DT is wrapped up so magnificently.As much shit as King gets for failing to stick the landing with regards to the ending in a lot of his books, he really nailed it in book 7. It was pretty much perfect.
Yeah his weakest skill is endings (Gerald's Game, Under the Dome, even The Stand to a large extent greatly disappointed me) and yet DT is wrapped up so magnificently.
Wizard and Glass is fantastic. I don't think I'm spoiling too much when I say a huge chunk of the book is a flashback tale, and it's an astonishing piece of work.Funny seeing this thread as I finished Waste Lands today.
I started that book years ago after breezing through the first two in a couple of days. I read a little over 300 pages before I put down Waste Lands as it bothered me immensely how trite and ill thought through the whole setting and its fantastical elements became. The doors in Drawing of the Three already were pretty convenient and random ways to make that particular story work, but I found that easy to ignore as those were not really the focus. The way book three took forever towas just teeeerrible, though. Characters just continued to have visions and dreams that showed them all these arbitrary and incomprehensible things they had to do in order to accomplish the thing. Then the goofy house scene happened and the book lost me completely. I quit. I assume in the early 90s I would have found that considerably less offensive, but reading it today was just hard work.get Jake into Rolands world
Anyway, earlier this week, for no reason, I decided I should finish the book and I did so in a couple of days. I still had issues with the last half of the book, but I generally found that to be alright-ish. Now I wonder if I should bother with the rest of the books. I already have Glass as I bought that together with Waste Lands years ago when I was so excited after finishing the Drawing, but I don't wanna start another book I wont finish for a couple of years...
Not yet, it's sitting on my shelf. It looks so chunky, and after wading through DT, The Stand and Under the Dome in recent years I've been trying to cycle through my favourite authors and stick to smaller books (<400). But I've heard a lot of positivity about it. King seems to have really hit a new streak of form in recent years. Joyland is being well received too, and I thought all four Full Dark, No Stars novellas were great. With new entries in The Shining and DT series too he's been reborn after some pretty ordinary stuff in the previous decade.Don't know if you read the Kennedy book but that is one of his best endings. Really touching too.
Not yet, it's sitting on my shelf. It looks so chunky, and after wading through DT, The Stand and Under the Dome in recent years I've been trying to cycle through my favourite authors and stick to smaller books (<400). But I've heard a lot of positivity about it. King seems to have really hit a new streak of form in recent years. Joyland is being well received too, and I thought all four Full Dark, No Stars novellas were great. With new entries in The Shining and DT series too he's been reborn after some pretty ordinary stuff in the previous decade.
Yeah his weakest skill is endings (Gerald's Game, Under the Dome, even The Stand to a large extent greatly disappointed me) and yet DT is wrapped up so magnificently.
Wizard and Glass is fantastic. I don't think I'm spoiling too much when I say a huge chunk of the book is a flashback tale, and it's an astonishing piece of work.
Wolves of the Calla is great too. Wasn't expecting such a side-story as the series finale fast approached, but it has probably the most epic and fascinating plot of any one particular book..
I hate howWhoa! Hold on there the ending to the Stand is great.
Yeah, I already knew that it was mostly about flashbacks. I don't particularly care for that/b]but I wouldn't hesitate giving it a chance regardless if I didn't have all these problems with book 3.
So the first chapter takes place either before Pricetown or after meeting Brown. But after leaving Brown he heads to the Way Station where he meets Jake. I feel really stupid and I'm blaming it on the time passed since reason and murky recollection.
I THINK the first chapter is set between speaking to Brown and encountering Jake at the Way Station. It isn't really made very clear though. Was just looking for confirmation from someone really.
Cool, I guess I'll read it at some point then. Thanks.Oh you will. It's arguably the best part of the series. It reveals so, so much about Roland and his quest, really adds weight to everything. Usually characters that exist only in flashbacks (be it games, TV, film, books, whatever) are easily forgettable, but those in Roland's past are fantastic. One in particular shapes Roland's very being.
Cheers for the reply, but it's that first chapter that confuses me. It's hard to tell exactly where it falls amongst the stages you listed above. I don't think it's before Brown because in the first chapter he says he's been in the desert for months, but when meeting Brown he mentions being in the last town just weeks ago. So I think the desert trek of the first chapter must be on his way towards the Way Station.I think the chronology goes Pricetown -> Tull -> Brown -> Way Station. The flashback to Tull is prompted by Roland telling his story to Brown. The Gunslinger jumps around in time a lot. It contributed to the weird surreal vibe that makes that book feel way different from the others.
Yep, that's what I'd go with. I remember realizing on a reread that most of the first part is told in reverse chronology. He's in the desert, then flashes back to Brown, then flashes back to Tull, and even within the Tull story there's a flashback to Allie's experience before Roland showed up.Pricetown > Tull > Brown > Desert > Way Station.
Ok, yeah, I'll go with that. Thanks for putting my mind to rest.Yep, that's what I'd go with. I remember realizing on a reread that most of the first part is told in reverse chronology. He's in the desert, then flashes back to Brown, then flashes back to Tull, and even within the Tull story there's a flashback to Allie's experience before Roland showed up.
small little update that shows the movies/tv shows are still alive:
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/65837
small little update that shows the movies/tv shows are still alive:
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/65837
I could see Aaron Paul as Eddie.