• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The Dracula movies

Status
Not open for further replies.

lazygecko

Member
Which one is your preference? Note that by Dracula movies I mean the ones based or loosely based on the events depicted in the Bram Stoker novels, so not stuff like Dracula Untold or Dracula 2000.

The contestants:

Nosferatu (1922)

358qqm06do7y.jpg

Director: Friedrich Wilhelm Murnau
Actor: Max Schreck

Description: The very first one, which is old enough to be a silent movie from the German expressionist era. It's not technically based on the novel due to copyright shenigans at the time (and copies of the film were almost completely wiped out thanks to it) but the plot is basically the same with the names switched around a bit, with Dracula becoming Orlok.

Dracula (1931)


Director: Tod Browning
Actor: Bela Lugosi

Description: The film that made Bela Lugosi a superstar. A couple of changes to the plot here, like Renfield taking on aspects of Harker's role.

Horror of Dracula (1958)


Director: Terence Fisher
Actor: Cristopher Lee

Description: The first of many, many Dracula films by Hammer. This one being a much looser interpretation of the original novel. You can tell that Cristopher Lee wasn't a big name yet when this was being made, since Peter Cushing is the one recieving main credit. Funnily enough the same thing would happen with Gerard Butler in Dracula 2000.

Nosferatu (1979)


Director: Werner Herzog
Actor: Klaus Kinski

Description: Eccentric filmmaker Herzog's remake of the 1922 movie. This one makes some interesting changes and additions to the plot, particularly near the end of the movie and lets the traditionally passive female role assume a much more active one.

Bram Stoker's Dracula (1992)


Director: Francis Ford Coppola
Actor: Gary Oldman

Description: This is likely the one most are familiar with. Lots of big, still relevant actors are in this one and the standout addition is probably the exploration of Dracula's origins, which became the focal point in this year's Dracula Untold.

Dracula: Dead and Loving It (1995)


Director: Mel Brooks
Actor: Leslie Nielsen

Description: Lol.


Personally, my pick would be the 1979 Nosferatu remake. I think the original 1922 Nosferatu aged better than both the Universal and Hammer ones, and I'm already a fan of Werner Herzog, so this was a match made in heaven. The whole movie has such a dreary and depressing atmosphere to set it apart from the rest, which is amplified further by the plot changes and the "twist", as well as Popol Vuh's creepy music (...which actually sounds the same in all other Herzog movies, even though they're not horror).
 

Currygan

at last, for christ's sake
1958 Dracula remains the best

Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee, it doesn't get better than that
 

TAJ

Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.
I remember being fond of another Dracula comedy, Love At First Bite, but the last time I saw it was in the early '80s.
Looking back, hiring a famously tanned actor as Dracula was inspired and something I didn't appreciate at the time.
 

Astaereth

Member
You're missing the Spanish version of the 1931, the '79 version with Langella, the Guy Maddin ballet version (Dracula: Pages From a Virgin's Diary), and Blacula.

The best movie on the list is probably Nosferatu (the original). But the best in terms of adaptation of the novel is the 1958 Hammer version, which streamlines the story in a very neat and effective way.
 

- J - D -

Member
Probably the original Nosferatu, followed by the Warner Herzog remake. I also really enjoyed Shadow of the Vampire, which was a fictionalized account of the making of Nosferatu. Willem Dafoe plays Orlok/Max Shreck and John Malkovitch plays FW Murnau. It's pretty crazy.
 
A tie between both the original, and Herzog versions of Nosferatu. They just present 'vamipre' in the most quintessential way for me, both visually (creepy as fuck) and thematically by being presented more rodent like, a disease carrying entity that spreads a plague. It's so grim and gothic.

Not to mention, both films are incredibly technically and artistically sound, as Murnau and Herzog are fantastic directors.

Plus, Nosferatu is just a way better title.

I like a lot of elements of Coppala's Dracula (namely the excellently bizarre and colorful eastern/gothic fusion art direction, Gary Oldman's brilliantly hammy/sinister performance as Dracula, the amazing intro sequence, and some creative camera work and effects--dat Dracula shadow), but it's just weighed down by so many weaker ones; the casting of Keanu Reeves, the movie skips over most of the interesting/creepy scenes in the castle at a brief clip and instead focuses the bulk of the running time on a shoddy, unconvincing romance between Oldman and Winona Rider, and, besides the scenery chewers amazingness and Reeve' 'oh my god so bad' performances, just generally uninterestingly presented characters overall.
 

braves01

Banned
Yo, Dracula has never looked better than in Bram Stoker's Dracula. Eiko Ishioka's art design (and Gary Oldman's acting) carry that movie. I don't even mind Keanu and Winona.
 
Yo, Dracula has never looked better than in Bram Stoker's Dracula. Eiko Ishioka's art design (and Gary Oldman's acting) carry that movie. I don't even mind Keanu and Winona.

He looked better in Nosferatu :p

I agree though about the best parts of the movie. Dracula, and everything else in the movie, looked fucking amazing and Oldman was great.
 

Kart94

Banned
1958 Dracula for me. Christopher Lee really nailed it.

I get the appeal of Nosferatu, but i generally perfer the Bela Lugosi type vampires. There is something scary about a monster that is human like and you wouldn't notice something is wrong with him until it is too late. Nosferatu is just too obvious.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom