I don't mind, but it's really not necessary. IMO, photos are often better left as is; yours looks sharper and has more contrast, but it also looks fake. The scene did not look like that when I was out there; you know what I mean?olimario said:I know you didn't ask for it, but I edited it a bit.
john tv said:Hell yeah! Those guys rule, though they're also responsible for all the damn potholes...
The human eye can see about 12 to 14 stops of contrast, while a digital camera only 8 or 9. What that means is that in a scene with a full range of brightness, you'll be able to see details with your eye that the camera sees as pure black or pure white, because it doesn't have as much range. So in actuality, it's creating more contrast than actually exists, and increasing contrast over the whole picture can destroy even more detail. Concerning color, people generally like more vibrant colors in their photos, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the original's colors are washed out. Your photos are closer to the oversaturated pictures you'd see in magazines than ones tweaked for color accuracy.olimario said:
Both times I've been to the yuki matsuri it's been too warm and all the sculptures were melting. The first time they even put out signs apologizing for the weather. I hope one day I can go and see the festival in all its gloryShouta said:
BugCatcher said:
