We're better off if women were in power, testosterone is the source of all the world's problems. Look at the Mosou, sexual openness, honesty, none of that taboo silliness and violence is frowned upon and rarely used. But let's keep with the penis waving contests and destroy foreign nations while making sure we have a permanent underclass in our own. That works.
I fucking hate this kind of articles. Way to give the "uuuugh feminists suck" crew shit to work with and a small little chance for everyone to be a tiny bit more sexist.
Dr. Ian Malcolm: God creates dinosaurs. God destroys dinosaurs. God creates man. Man destroys God. Man creates dinosaurs.
Dr. Ellie Sattler: Dinosaurs eat man. Woman inherits the earth.
In this case is it the actual article, which is just a review of a book, or is it the content of the book as it relates to the subject? Is Hanna Rosin and her views actually the source of contention here? Or is it the review article?
I don't have anything against the content of the review, the problem is that it highlights this kind of book that would go completely unnoticed to the kind of people who will later go crying in the nth sexism thread about how feminists are actually evil.
No one actually buys her reasonings, no need to argue them.
+1 for the home-husband lifestyle.
We're better off if women were in power, testosterone is the source of all the world's problems. Look at the Mosou, sexual openness, honesty, none of that taboo silliness and violence is frowned upon and rarely used. But let's keep with the penis waving contests and destroy foreign nations while making sure we have a permanent underclass in our own. That works.
+1 for the home-husband lifestyle.
I thought we were striving for equality not to shift the power over, but distribute it evenly?
+1 for the home-husband lifestyle.
I really am better at cleaning than my wife. It's because I feel the need for a tidy environment while she doesn't really care. Could this be the true reason men have subjugated women for so long?Because let's be honest, we are better at cleaning, cooking and raising the kids.
I thought we were striving for equality not to shift the power over, but distribute it evenly?
We're better off if women were in power, testosterone is the source of all the world's problems. Look at the Mosou, sexual openness, honesty, none of that taboo silliness and violence is frowned upon and rarely used. But let's keep with the penis waving contests and destroy foreign nations while making sure we have a permanent underclass in our own. That works.
depths20XX said:Women can take up the working world. I'm tired of it.
Nobody got together and decided what was happening was happening. If men turn into a bunch of losers, then that's what happens. If women's skills are more needed in the work force, then that's what happens. There is no conspiracy going on. It's men's fault why men are losing control in the house, in the workforce, etc.
That'd be cool with me, I'd freaking love to be a househusband.
You'd be okay with someone else paying your bills?
Granted, you would be cleaning the house, raising the kids, etc etc. But you wouldn't earn any money from it.
Think about it. Women had issues in the past because they got shitty salaries in almost every job, so if they didn't want to starve to death, they basically had to get a good husband.
"According to some, men have no responsibility in Mosuo society—they would have no jobs, rest all day, and conserve their strength for nighttime visits.[6] However, Mosuo males do have important roles in their society. They are in charge of livestock and fishing,[4] which they learn from their uncles and older male family members as soon as they are old enough."
Well this works for me.
You'd be okay with someone else paying your bills?
Granted, you would be cleaning the house, raising the kids, etc etc. But you wouldn't earn any money from it.
Um, he's neither? What he said was absolutely true, and you would have to really be reaching to construe his post as legitimately bigoted in nature.I can't tell if you are a misogynist, a misandrist, or both.
I grew up being the only male in the house full of 4 women, I use to work overnight being one of 2 of the only males in a 10 person shift. With that I can only chuckle at female dominance.
I thought we were striving for equality not to shift the power over, but distribute it evenly?
Enough people that she got a book published.
Kind of lol'd at how you made "getting a good husband" sound like a scenario only marginally better than starving to death.
So?
Not everything of value is reflected monetarily.
It might be in some cases
I thought we were striving for equality not to shift the power over, but distribute it evenly?
I can't tell if you are a misogynist, a misandrist, or both.
She's applauding that she's ending the dominant era of man, and making way for the dominant era of women? How the fuck can she justify taking power when her main point is that it's wrong for men to be in power?
I thought we were striving for equality not to shift the power over, but distribute it evenly?
Welcome to modern feminism. It's not about equality anymore.
In the 70s feminists wanted equality and fought hard for it. A feminist from the 70s would (today) see things like there being 50% more females in college than males as a problem, and would strive to get schools to help boys. Just as they did for girls when the inequality was the other way around.
A modern feminist sees that statistic and shouts "Haha we're winning! The end of men!", and continue to push for programs and legislation that further empower females and ignore men.