• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

"The End of Men And the Rise of Women"

Status
Not open for further replies.

jorma

is now taking requests
We're better off if women were in power, testosterone is the source of all the world's problems. Look at the Mosou, sexual openness, honesty, none of that taboo silliness and violence is frowned upon and rarely used. But let's keep with the penis waving contests and destroy foreign nations while making sure we have a permanent underclass in our own. That works.

"According to some, men have no responsibility in Mosuo society—they would have no jobs, rest all day, and conserve their strength for nighttime visits.[6] However, Mosuo males do have important roles in their society. They are in charge of livestock and fishing,[4] which they learn from their uncles and older male family members as soon as they are old enough."

Well this works for me.
 

ReBurn

Gold Member
I fucking hate this kind of articles. Way to give the "uuuugh feminists suck" crew shit to work with and a small little chance for everyone to be a tiny bit more sexist.

In this case is it the actual article, which is just a review of a book, or is it the content of the book as it relates to the subject? Is Hanna Rosin and her views actually the source of contention here? Or is it the review article?
 

Takuan

Member
From what I've seen, it's only in North America/certain parts of English-speaking Europe that this might apply. Globally, women are still viewed as inferior at best and consumable commodities at worst.

I like the way these Mosou roll, too.
 
In this case is it the actual article, which is just a review of a book, or is it the content of the book as it relates to the subject? Is Hanna Rosin and her views actually the source of contention here? Or is it the review article?

I don't have anything against the content of the review, the problem is that it highlights this kind of book that would go completely unnoticed to the kind of people who will later go crying in the nth sexism thread about how feminists are actually evil.

No one actually buys her reasonings, no need to argue them.
 

Dead Man

Member
I don't have anything against the content of the review, the problem is that it highlights this kind of book that would go completely unnoticed to the kind of people who will later go crying in the nth sexism thread about how feminists are actually evil.

No one actually buys her reasonings, no need to argue them.

Enough people that she got a book published.
 

Ikael

Member
We're better off if women were in power, testosterone is the source of all the world's problems. Look at the Mosou, sexual openness, honesty, none of that taboo silliness and violence is frowned upon and rarely used. But let's keep with the penis waving contests and destroy foreign nations while making sure we have a permanent underclass in our own. That works.

This analysis doesn't hold up not even one bit. First, Mousuo are a Matrilinear society, not matriarchal. Pre - Roman Iberian tribes were predominantely matriachal in the strictest sense of the word (only women could wield certain religious and political positions of power, and they participated in the army too) yet they warred and waged war between each other extensively like pretty much the rest of the ancient world. And let's better not get into particulary nasty cases such as Mao's Widow, the disastrous Cleopatra's policies or Thacher's conservative ascension.

Women are every bit as inept and agressive as men when it comes to politics and powerplay. The whole "wars are created by macho instincts" is a laughably intellectually lazy position, like the whole "animals are so much ethical than humans". You can only believe these tropes by ignoring history and biology respectively.


+1 for the home-husband lifestyle.

I honestly would not have any kind of problem with assuming that role, really.
 
3NW
 

gwarm01

Member
Because let's be honest, we are better at cleaning, cooking and raising the kids.
I really am better at cleaning than my wife. It's because I feel the need for a tidy environment while she doesn't really care. Could this be the true reason men have subjugated women for so long?
 
I thought we were striving for equality not to shift the power over, but distribute it evenly?

Nobody got together and decided what was happening was happening. If men turn into a bunch of losers, then that's what happens. If women's skills are more needed in the work force, then that's what happens. There is no conspiracy going on. It's men's fault why men are losing control in the house, in the workforce, etc.
 
We're better off if women were in power, testosterone is the source of all the world's problems. Look at the Mosou, sexual openness, honesty, none of that taboo silliness and violence is frowned upon and rarely used. But let's keep with the penis waving contests and destroy foreign nations while making sure we have a permanent underclass in our own. That works.


Good thing women don't have any testosterone!

depths20XX said:
Women can take up the working world. I'm tired of it.

That'd be cool with me, I'd freaking love to be a househusband.
I need a benefactress who will financially support my involvement in the arts.
 

Dead Man

Member
Nobody got together and decided what was happening was happening. If men turn into a bunch of losers, then that's what happens. If women's skills are more needed in the work force, then that's what happens. There is no conspiracy going on. It's men's fault why men are losing control in the house, in the workforce, etc.

I can't tell if you are a misogynist, a misandrist, or both.
 
That'd be cool with me, I'd freaking love to be a househusband.

You'd be okay with someone else paying your bills?
Granted, you would be cleaning the house, raising the kids, etc etc. But you wouldn't earn any money from it.

Think about it. Women had issues in the past because they got shitty salaries in almost every job, so if they didn't want to starve to death, they basically had to get a good husband.
 
You'd be okay with someone else paying your bills?
Granted, you would be cleaning the house, raising the kids, etc etc. But you wouldn't earn any money from it.

Think about it. Women had issues in the past because they got shitty salaries in almost every job, so if they didn't want to starve to death, they basically had to get a good husband.

If the relationship is of mutual benefit then why not?

I get shitty salaries right now. I make about $550 a month. Doesn't matter to me.

Kind of lol'd at how you made "getting a good husband" sound like a scenario only marginally better than starving to death.
 

Setsuna

Member
i'd gladly be a stay at home dad/father

"According to some, men have no responsibility in Mosuo society—they would have no jobs, rest all day, and conserve their strength for nighttime visits.[6] However, Mosuo males do have important roles in their society. They are in charge of livestock and fishing,[4] which they learn from their uncles and older male family members as soon as they are old enough."

Well this works for me.

so goto the supermarket and watch the fridge
 

Slayven

Member
I grew up being the only male in the house full of 4 women, I use to work overnight being one of 2 of the only males in a 10 person shift. With that I can only chuckle at female dominance.
 

Zeppelin

Member
Glad to see America finally getting some of that radical feminism. Reading that review was like travelling 10 years back in time. And it'll only get more insane from here onwards. :)
 

Jarate

Banned
if this article was written by a male it would've about how much men dominate, and with similar tones, this would've been horrific

not only does she use awful statistics to prove her points, she also is incredibly biased during it

Im very glad that women are gaining a strengthened hold in the job market, it makes me happy that we can all generally be equal, but males are biologically way more driven then females to become higher ups. Not to say that females don't have those ambitions, or that they are worse for it, but for terms of producing offspring, women want successful men, men don't care if the female is successful. Men are way more likely to have the drive and ambition to become super successful.
 

Parallax

best seen in the classic "Shadow of the Beast"
I grew up being the only male in the house full of 4 women, I use to work overnight being one of 2 of the only males in a 10 person shift. With that I can only chuckle at female dominance.

i can understand this.
 

Zaptruder

Banned
Hey ladies, if this means men get to subsume traditional feminine roles without society thinking ill of it, then fantastic. Sign me up.

Reality is - men continue to work/stick to quickly outmoded masculine roles, while women get an increasing range of roles granted to them, as well as keeping the choice of having their traditional feminine roles.
 

Reuenthal

Banned
I am sorry that they are sexist and stupid but I don't see what I can do to help the lady the review is about and the ones they agree with her. I am also sorry for her son.
 

A.E Suggs

Member
I thought we were striving for equality not to shift the power over, but distribute it evenly?

Some are but there are a good number of feminist that won't the balance of power to change with woman being on top. Some are just to afraid to come out and say it and others may be blind to see that other feminist feel that way. I'm sure its like this with all extremist groups though as there's always a side that wants full control and don't like how others or doing things. I'm sure this happened with first and second wave feminist as well.

Either way I don't really care if they surpass us oh well, its not going to change genetics or the need for sex so this doesn't effect me.

Enough people that she got a book published.

Yep and these are the people you have to actually be more afraid of, the ones that are more outspoken.
 
I will not let men go without a fight! I declare a war on women!

*genders gather on opposite sides in a open battlefield*

Me: "What these are women thinking? Us, men, have brought machine guns, tanks, jets, and even have a few spare divisions of nerds with slingshots. The women army brought none of these!"

*Bar Refaeli approaches the men's front line*

Bar: "Us, women, have found this war to be unnecessary. We would like one of you to come with me and discuss terms for peace."

Me: "Ha, I knew they would crumble. Now, guys, stay here while I go negotiate with her."

Some other dude: "Nah, man, I'll negotiate with her."

Me: "Fuck you, I'm the leader. I'm doing it."

Another dude: "Hey, I'm a better negotiator than the both of you! I'm going."

*I stab that dude, and most of the army of men erupt into a fight to the last man to talk to a supermodel. Meanwhile, divisions of more muscular women flank around the guys fighting and take out the nerds with slingshots sitting around playing Magic and Yugioh cards in the back of the battlefield. *

/exit dream mode


Shit, men really are screwed... ... ...But, let's just get this straight, I am the one that will be negotiating with Bar.
 

GatorBait

Member
You know, I'm not sure I even want to have children, but if I could become a house-husband, I would seriously rethink my stance on children.
 

Mudkips

Banned
She's applauding that she's ending the dominant era of man, and making way for the dominant era of women? How the fuck can she justify taking power when her main point is that it's wrong for men to be in power?

I thought we were striving for equality not to shift the power over, but distribute it evenly?

Welcome to modern feminism. It's not about equality anymore.

In the 70s feminists wanted equality and fought hard for it. A feminist from the 70s would (today) see things like there being 50% more females in college than males as a problem, and would strive to get schools to help boys. Just as they did for girls when the inequality was the other way around.

A modern feminist sees that statistic and shouts "Haha we're winning! The end of men!", and continue to push for programs and legislation that further empower females and ignore men.
 

JohnDoe

Banned
Where are those women with "hearts of steel" who only want me for sex?
And there really oughta be a new term for those women who don't want to be eqilual but dominant. Feminist is just the wrong word.
 

M-PG71C

Member
She is just as sexist and as bad as the men that beat women.

People like her have no place in the modern world. People, regardless of where they come from and who they are, should be striving to better each-other.

Ideas, morals, laws...these are all things that should reflect the better part of society. Tearing each-other down and claiming to re-write the said above will not create progress.

In other words, while I can apperciate her stance on the matter, someone needs to take the pen away from her and apply duct tape to her mouth. She would do better to look and see first before writing.
 
You know what else is funny? I come into this thread and the ad I have at the top of the screen is for meeting local women who want to get it on and at the bottom it's an for SnorgTees with a woman with enormous breasts jammed into a tight t-shirt.

Equality!
 

tearsofash

Member
Welcome to modern feminism. It's not about equality anymore.

In the 70s feminists wanted equality and fought hard for it. A feminist from the 70s would (today) see things like there being 50% more females in college than males as a problem, and would strive to get schools to help boys. Just as they did for girls when the inequality was the other way around.

A modern feminist sees that statistic and shouts "Haha we're winning! The end of men!", and continue to push for programs and legislation that further empower females and ignore men.

That's a pretty big assumption of modern feminists. What do you base that off of?
 
If these so called socially progressive women feel that progress is reversing "who's-dominating-who" then fuck em' in their hypocritical ass. What the fuck is with this sensationalist women are better than men bullshit trend that's been so prevalent in the media the last couple years? They yell "Fuck Patriarchy" but what they mean is "Fuck Male Patriarchy", they just want to switch to puss' instead of cock at the top.

A way to build a healthy social structure is not to privilege the formerly subjugated over their subjugators, it's to honor both equally. Is it healthy to say women are better than men? You guys actually think that is progress? It's a reactionary reversal and it's far far far more harmful than good. Women are just as capable of being pieces of shit. Goodnight.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom