Ragnorok64
Member
Wait, is the audio version of this 50 minutes long? This isn't something I can just read during downtime then.
A bunch of people have already responded to you, but surely you agree that being black is detrimental to one's hopes of becoming president, especially if you align yourself with the Republican party? Again, the odds are 44 to 1.What I said was that being white or male doesn't really help you become a president that much.
Preaching this from the highest mountains in the United States will get you killed. This country is not prepared to confront any of this. We are country founded on genocide, racism and violence. To confront that with an open heart is to acknowledge the darkness from which most of this country was born.
Name one country that wasn't founded on genocide, racism and violence.
Name one country that wasn't founded on genocide, racism and violence.
Name one country that wasn't founded on genocide, racism and violence.
Here comes the whataboutisms. Every nation has a past, and we can nitpick through each one if you like. But the history of North America is very self evident for everyone here.
This isn't a whataboutism. I just think it's odd that America gets singled out for this, when it's coded into the DNA of every country on the planet. Every single one of them. This isn't just an American problem. It's a human one.
I was formerly like yourself, sir, a very warm advocate of the abolition of slavery, the labor reformer George Henry Evans argued in a letter to the abolitionist Gerrit Smith. This was before I saw that there was white slavery. Evans was a putative ally of Smith and his fellow abolitionists. But still he asserted that the landless white was worse off than the enslaved black, who at least enjoyed surety of support in sickness and old age.
This isn't a whataboutism. I just think it's odd that America gets singled out for this, when it's coded into the DNA of every country on the planet. Every single one of them. This isn't just an American problem. It's a human one.
But this is about Americans tackling American problems. They may not be problems specific to us, but they are unique. You came in saying, "what about all the other countries?"This isn't a whataboutism. I just think it's odd that America gets singled out for this, when it's coded into the DNA of every country on the planet. Every single one of them. This isn't just an American problem. It's a human one.
👀
Name one country that wasn't founded on genocide, racism and violence.
What I said was that being white or male doesn't really help you become a president that much.
Name one country that wasn't founded on genocide, racism and violence.
THE SCOPE OF TRUMP'S commitment to whiteness is matched only by the depth of popular disbelief in the power of whiteness. We are now being told that support for Trump's ”Muslim ban," his scapegoating of immigrants, his defenses of police brutality are somehow the natural outgrowth of the cultural and economic gap between Lena Dunham's America and Jeff Foxworthy's. The collective verdict holds that the Democratic Party lost its way when it abandoned everyday economic issues like job creation for the softer fare of social justice. The indictment continues: To their neoliberal economics, Democrats and liberals have married a condescending elitist affect that sneers at blue-collar culture and mocks the white man as history's greatest monster and prime-time television's biggest doofus. In this rendition, Donald Trump is not the product of white supremacy so much as the product of a backlash against contempt for white working-class people.
”The utter contempt with which privileged Eastern liberals such as myself discuss red-state, gun-country, working-class America as ridiculous and morons and rubes," charged the celebrity chef Anthony Bourdain, ”is largely responsible for the upswell of rage and contempt and desire to pull down the temple that we're seeing now."
That black people, who have lived for centuries under such derision and condescension, have not yet been driven into the arms of Trump does not trouble these theoreticians. After all, in this analysis, Trump's racism and the racism of his supporters are incidental to his rise. Indeed, the alleged glee with which liberals call out Trump's bigotry is assigned even more power than the bigotry itself. Ostensibly assaulted by campus protests, battered by arguments about intersectionality, and oppressed by new bathroom rights, a blameless white working class did the only thing any reasonable polity might: elect an orcish reality-television star who insists on taking his intelligence briefings in picture-book form.
Name one country that wasn't founded on genocide, racism and violence.
An obligatory "fuck you" from me to any liberal or leftist willingly bought into this bullcrap. An obligatory "fuck yourself" to anyone that tried to put the blame on marginalized people as if it's our fault this fucking buffoon is in office.
Name another country where the statement:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
Is at the core of it's existence.
The problems with racism, violence, and inequality in the United States today is that it is a direct attack on what once made the United States something unique. An attempt, even if very misguided and slow moving, to deliver true equality to all people independent of race, religion, and status at birth. A true meritocracy.
That's good...real good.
99% of the people in the south that would read that wouldn't understand what it is saying.
Unfortunately....
👀
I think Coates is making an unfair generalization here, as most left wing whites are eager to tackle the issues of racism in addition to other related struggles, such as classism, out of which the rich historically pitted poor whites against blacks to create and maintain a sort of caste system which would indefinitely keep them (the rich) and their heirs wealthy, in power, and unchallenged by those who are poor, white, black, and otherwise. American history has been ugly, and rich whites have architected it out of race-and-class-based divide and conquer tactics.
👀
What he's saying is that white liberals and progressives dismiss white supremacy's legacy as only belonging to overt racists of the south and interior and white evangelicals. I think Coates is making an unfair generalization here, as most left wing whites are eager to tackle the issues of racism in addition to other related struggles, such as classism, out of which the rich historically pitted poor whites against blacks to create and maintain a sort of caste system which would indefinitely keep them (the rich) and their heirs wealthy, in power, and unchallenged by those who are poor, white, black, and otherwise. American history has been ugly, and rich whites have architected it out of race-and-class-based divide and conquer tactics.
We were eight years in power was the lament of Reconstruction-era black politicians as the American experiment in multiracial democracy ended with the return of white supremacist rule in the South. In this sweeping collection of new and selected essays, Ta-Nehisi Coates explores the tragic echoes of that history in our own time: the unprecedented election of a black president followed by a vicious backlash that fueled the election of the man Coates argues is Americas first white president.
What he's saying is that white liberals and progressives dismiss white supremacy's legacy as only belonging to overt racists of the south and interior and white evangelicals. I think Coates is making an unfair generalization here, as most left wing whites are eager to tackle the issues of racism in addition to other related struggles, such as classism, out of which the rich historically pitted poor whites against blacks to create and maintain a sort of caste system which would indefinitely keep them (the rich) and their heirs wealthy, in power, and unchallenged by those who are poor, white, black, and otherwise. American history has been ugly exploition through and through, and rich whites have architected it out of race-and-class-based divide and conquer tactics.
As an outcome of being the lowest caste/rung on that ladder of wealth and power, black and native people have suffered by far the worst.
Are they? A thousand one thinkpieces have been written about how identity politics need to be abandon, but folks on the "left"
Eager enough to give reparations, though?
While identity is a key factor, so is class. Both work together. Focusing on just one hampers progress imo (and researchers in this subject)I haven't seen that. I've seen a bunch of liberals saying we need to stop focusing on identity politics, tho.
While identity is a key factor, so is class. Both work together. Focusing on just one hampers progress imo
Are they? A thousand one thinkpieces have been written about how identity politics need to be abandon, but folks on the "left"
That I don't agree with. I guess it's really hard to balance the two since people go full in the one or the other.But what people saying that really mean is stop talking to minorities. Even though these are universal issues.
While identity is a key factor, so is class. Both work together. Focusing on just one hampers progress imo
There is certainly a divide in the thinking on how things should be marketed, so as to win political power. But I would think that much of white liberals, especially progressives, have actual reform, not just lip service, on their agenda regarding systemic racism.
There is certainly a divide in the thinking on how things should be marketed, so as to win political power. But I would think that much of white liberals, especially progressives, have actual reform, not just lip service, on their agenda regarding systemic racism.
Coates essay here spends a large amount of time carefully building the case that throughout American history, that hopeful sentiment has primarily been, and continues to be, lip service at best.
To Trump, whiteness is neither notional nor symbolic but is the very core of his power. In this, Trump is not singular. But whereas his forebears carried whiteness like an ancestral talisman, Trump cracked the glowing amulet open, releasing its eldritch energies.
Lol the visuals from this writing is nuts.
Coates essay here spends a large amount of time carefully building the case that throughout American history, that hopeful sentiment has primarily been, and continues to be, lip service at best.
Wait, is the audio version of this 50 minutes long? This isn't something I can just read during downtime then.