TAJ
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.
Then it'd just be private security
We Snow Crash then
Or almost the entirety of human history.
Then it'd just be private security
We Snow Crash then
Literally every single time someone defends the police, they deflect the blame on black people.
Makes you think...
Who?
Never heard of these guys.
What is your understanding of why the police force was created in the United states of america?
I knew my post was going to get attention when I hit submit. And this is probably not the thread for it but here's my opinion.
Aside from a few bad apples I don't think racism is the police's problem. The problem in America is the war on drugs. When you take inner cities and dump a shitload of people in them with no money and no prospects. Literally a permanent underclass and their only way to make a living is to turn to selling drugs or other illegal things you are going to get huge clashes between that population and the police force.
It's just the way it is. And I think this is where Black Lives Matter misses the plot. Being a patrolman in West Baltimore or Chicago is a dangerous fucking job and you better be ready to kick some ass. It's just the reality of the situation. Until drugs like heroin and cocaine (and it's derivatives) are either legaglized and regulated or the punishments go way down the violence between the population itself and the population and the police is going to continue to escalate.
That's why I mention Baltimore specifically and why I mention the murder rate of unarmed black civilians. Yes there is clearly some bias amoungst some groups of police. But I highly highly doubt it's any higher then the general population. The issue is the war on drugs and it's been the issue for a long time now.
Police cameras might help with those unarmed people being shot or some of the crazy videos we've seen. But we are a nation of 300+ million and all those videos together don't count for that much. The real killing is going on in America's inner cities and people need to wake up to this.
I don't get why it's not more obvious.
Started as a volunteer system pre-revolution then to volunteer and for-profit that evolved as legislation and municipalities did into a public system. For-profit organizations being more notorious. Not much more beyond that.
Though since you asked I assumed deeper racial contexts so you've got me reading chunks of book now on southern private slave patrol police systems, literally being "legitimate" law enforcement agencies centered around human injustice...
"Putting words in my mouth"
Starting to hate that one
We need to redefine the concept of "implication" to the masses
The problem with this argument is that these drugs exist in rich white neighborhoods too. The police force was established to beat and keep the poor and minorities away from the upper class. The war on drugs hasn't changed this. It's only given them more tools to work with.
Take away the war on drugs and the police will still beat and kill minorities because that is their job.
Their endorsement of Trump makes this loud and clear.
I meant public resources as in clean parks, streets, and other nice amenities. Figured police districts were based on crime rate. Density and infrastructure makes sense as well.
Thanks for the info. I wonder how many other cities are done that way.
Fun fact, San Francisco has both a chief of police and a sheriff because the city and county are the same entity. Though the sheriff handles staffing jails and court stuff I believe, while the chief still handles the department forces. (again, my understanding)
I am shocked, wait...whats the opposite of shocked
Without police, there would be no rule of law
Safest communities have more resources because of the tax money they can spend that comes from the money that exists in that neighborhood. (at least this is my understanding)
Can we please dismantle the police force in the United States?
The problem with this argument is that these drugs exist in rich white neighborhoods too. The police force was established to beat and keep the poor and minorities away from the upper class. The war on drugs hasn't changed this. It's only given them more tools to work with.
Take away the war on drugs and the police will still beat and kill minorities because that is their job.
Their endorsement of Trump makes this loud and clear.
Pretty much.White supremacist union backs white supremacist candidate.
Started as a volunteer system pre-revolution then to volunteer and for-profit that evolved as legislation and municipalities did into a public system. For-profit organizations being more notorious. Not much more beyond that.
Though since you asked I assumed deeper racial contexts so you've got me reading chunks of book now on southern private slave patrol police systems, literally being "legitimate" law enforcement agencies centered around human injustice...
I don't doubt that middle class and up whites use drugs but they do it different. It's not heron or crack off the street. It's that xanax prescription Mom has or the Percocet prescription that little Johnny got hooked on and he's now buying them from his aunt. It's just done differently.
There is no rule of law in the U.S., the police are a perfect example of that. In order for rule of law to exist, it has to be enforced blindly. We know for a fact that the law does not apply equally to police, bankers, or politicians who sanction war crimes. What we have are a set of codes written by the wealthy and imposed on the poor and working class.
Tulsa, Oklahoma[/URL].
.
I don't doubt that middle class and up whites use drugs but they do it different. It's not heron or crack off the street. It's that xanax prescription Mom has or the Percocet prescription that little Johnny got hooked on and he's now buying them from his aunt. It's just done differently.
Using data from 72,561 youth interviewed for the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, researchers found that 37% of those aged between 12 and 17 had used alcohol or other drugs at least once in the past year. Nearly 8% met criteria for a substance use disorder either the less severe substance abuse diagnosis or the more problematic substance dependence, which is more commonly known as addiction.
The study, which was published Monday in the Archives of General Psychiatry, controlled for variables like socioeconomic status because rates of severe drug problems tend to be greater amongst the poor. Despite this, Native American youth fared worst, with 15% having a substance use disorder, compared to 9.2% for people of mixed racial heritage, 9.0% for whites, 7.7% for Hispanics, 5% for African Americans and 3.5% for Asians and Pacific Islanders.
Nearly 20 percent of whites have used cocaine, compared with 10 percent of blacks and Latinos, according to a 2011 survey from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration the most recent data available.
Higher percentages of whites have also tried hallucinogens, marijuana, pain relievers like OxyContin, and stimulants like methamphetamine, according to the survey. Crack is more popular among blacks than whites, but not by much.
Still, blacks are arrested for drug possession more than three times as often as whites, according to a 2009 report from the advocacy group Human Rights Watch.
therealjay said:I don't doubt that middle class and up whites use drugs but they do it different. It's not heron or crack off the street. It's that xanax prescription Mom has or the Percocet prescription that little Johnny got hooked on and he's now buying them from his aunt. It's just done differently.
The racism... wow.
Just saw this. Different? Down in SoCal Bakersfield my upper middle white high school was packed full of college prep kids that had meth as a drug of choice. Hell, my class president was the school's go to coke dealer and he graduated junior year to get a full ride at USC...
I assume you're actual point is that middle and upper class white drug culture has less violence, but it has the same sales culture which gets infinitely more slaps on the wrist than the poor black community for softer drugs such as weed.
And even worse, coke, a white drug of choice, fuels more death in mexican border towns than in wartime iraq and afghanistan. But they like to pretend their hands are clean? That crap makes me sick.
So yes, the ware on drugs is a major problem but you can't ignore that there is a racially specific unbalanced representation on punishment.
GTFO with things you have no clue about. I spent years copping dope on the street all the way from Jersey to DC. We'd literally go on DEA websites to find out where the purest shit was being sold or who was falling off on what bags. I also got pills off of white kids/adults around where I lived. It's completely different full stop.The racism... wow.
No it absolutely does not have the same sales culture. I can go down fayette street in baltimore and score some dope from some kid within ten minutes of looking.
“The race issue isn’t just that the judge is going, ‘Oh, black man, I’m gonna sentence you higher,’” she said. “The police go into low-income minority neighborhoods and that’s where they make most of their drug arrests. If they arrest you, now you have a ‘prior,’ so if you plead or get arrested again, you’re gonna have a higher sentence. There’s a kind of cumulative effect.”
Oh and by the way from the paper someone posted to prove my racism/ignorance on this issue. Heres a quote.
In 2002, a team of researchers at the University of Washington decided to take the defenses of the drug war seriously, by subjecting the arguments to empirical testing in a major study of drug-law enforcement in a racially mixed city - Seattle. The study found that, contrary to the prevailing "common sense," the high arrest rates of African Americans in drug-law enforcement could not be explained by rates of offending; nor could they be explained by other standard excuses, such as the ease and efficiency of policing open-air drug markets, citizen complaints, crime rates, or drug-related violence. The study also debunked the assumption that white drug dealers deal indoors, making their criminal activity more difficult to detect.
The authors found that it was untrue stereotypes about crack markets, crack dealers, and crack babies - not facts - that were driving discretionary decision making by the Seattle Police Department. The facts were as follows: Seattle residents were far more likely to report suspected narcotics activity in residences - not outdoors - but police devoted their resources to open-air drug markets and to the one precinct that was least likely to be identified as the site of suspected drug activity in citizen complaints. In fact, although hundreds of outdoor drug transactions were recorded in predominantly white areas of Seattle, police concentrated their drug enforcement efforts in one downtown drug market where the frequency of drug transactions was much lower. In racially mixed open-air drug markets, black dealers were far more likely to be arrested than whites, even though white dealers were present and visible. And the department focused overwhelmingly on crack - the one drug in Seattle more likely to be sold by African Americans - despite the fact that local hospital records indicated that overdose deaths involving heroin were more numerous than all overdose deaths for crack and powder cocaine combined. Local police acknowledged that no significant level of violence was associated with crack in Seattle and that other drugs were causing more hospitalizations, but steadfastly maintained that their deployment decisions were nondiscriminatory.
The study's authors concluded, based on their review and analysis of the empirical evidence, that the Seattle Police Department's decision to focus so heavily on crack, to the near exclusion of other drugs, and to concentrate its efforts on outdoor drug markets in downtown areas rather than drug markets located indoors or in predominantly white communities, reflect "a racialized conception of the drug problem." As the authors put it: "[The Seattle Police Department's] foucs on black and Latino individuals and on the drug most strongly associated with 'blackness' suggest that law enforcement policies and practices are predicated on the assumption that the drug problem is, in fact, a black and Latino one, and that crack, the drug most strongly associated with urban blacks, is 'the worst.' This racialized cultural script about who and what constitutes the drug problem renders illegal drug activity by whites invisible. "White people," the study's author's observed, "are simply not perceived as drug offenders by Seattle police officers.
In past elections they have sometimes simply not endorsed anyone at all.
I still cannot fathom why a union and a police union at that would support a Republican candidate considering they hate unions
While I am normally pro-Union, I would be more than ok with the dismantling of police unions.
n Chicago, for instance, businessmen donated money to buy the police rifles, artillery, Gatling guns, buildings, and money to establish a police pension out of their own pockets.
Class conflict roiled late nineteenth century American cities like Chicago, which experienced major strikes and riots in 1867, 1877, 1886, and 1894. In each of these upheavals, the police attacked strikers with extreme violence...
n 1885, when Chicago began to experience a wave of strikes, some policemen sympathized with strikers. But once the police hierarchy and the mayor decided to break the strikes, policemen who refused to comply were fired. In these and a thousand similar ways, the police were molded into a force that would impose order on working class and poor people, whatever the individual feelings of the officers involved.
The police were created to use violence to reconcile electoral democracy with industrial capitalism. Today, they are just one part of the “criminal justice” system which continues to play the same role. Their basic job is to enforce order among those with the most reason to resent the system – who in our society today are disproportionately poor black people.
This is utterly terrifying.
Imagine if Donald Trump wins this election.
Imagine it.
No one has "clean hands" in all of this. Of that there is no doubt.
GTFO with things you have no clue about. I spent years copping dope on the street all the way from Jersey to DC. We'd literally go on DEA websites to find out where the purest shit was being sold or who was falling off on what bags. I also got pills off of white kids/adults around where I lived. It's completely different full stop.
Already gearing up for inevitable announcement of national martian law to combat illegal aliens and foreign agents of terror.
This is why police are supporting trump. Yes, some are racist, but others see a candidate who sympathizes with the very difficult job they have and the problems with public perception that are affecting that job.
I'm a staunch liberal and most assuredly not an all lives / blue lives idiot like some are, but painting entire groups with such a broad brush gets no one anywhere. I'm really sick of people on GAF doing drive by posts like this on any topic. It brings down the standard of discourse and perpetuates the simplistic thinking that is stifling race and other relations in America.
This is why you're on of my favesThese are some good resources for background:
A Brief History of Slavery and the Origins of American Policing
The History of Policing in the United States, Part 1
A Report from Occupied Territory
Blood On Their Hands: The Racist History of Modern Police Unions
And a couple good articles / interviews:
The KKK Has Infiltrated U.S. Police Departments For Decades
An interview with the Baltimore cop whos revealing all the horrible things he saw on the job