Alcibiades
Member
Which is why I bring them up as part of Nader's platform.Loki said:Yes, reduction of corporate welfare is a conservative position in the strictest sense-- it's just that that view (along with the others you mention) is given short shrift in the conservative media and in the party's platform. I don't condone any of those actions, for what it's worth (referring to corporate welfare, offshore tax havens and questionable accounting practices).
If you read my first post, I give them as positives on his stance on positions.
So basically, I know that Republicans are terrible offenders (sometimes more than Democrats).
Which is why I'm willing to go the "Protest Vote" route for a candidate that won't win, but supports at least some of your issues.
I don't agree 100% with either Nader, Kerry, or Bush, but considering that on some things Bush and the Republicans aren't any better than the Democrats (and I mostly support Republicans nationally), I might as well give a protest vote.
I mean, what you're saying is just reinforcing my point from my first post, I don't get why what I posted "doesn't make sense"