The GAF Video and Filmmaking Thread

I think it's the swappable lenses and the large amount of options (as well as doubling as a photo camera) that makes them appealing.

Personally I've been using a Panasonic G6 and have been enjoying it, but it's on the cheaper end and I've been looking to upgrade (~1500-~2000). Should I be leaning towards a DSLR, or are there better options? I want something that won't become (too) irrelevant once new cameras start rolling out, and something I can use for a while.

Is it the swappable lens or is it the fixation to produce that "film-look" first and foremost and not taking time to learn about everything else that comes with filmmaking, like audio and sound effects, dolly grips, editing etc. Yes by buying a DSLR with fast lens you do produce a look that's conformist and nice, but if I were to pursue filmmaking I would grab the closest camera that produces material suitable for editing and doesn't suck to use hours on end. I'd use the rest of the budget on a basic rig. A good mic or two, a pocket dolly like in that video, a tripod, and editing software.

Edit: Anything that gives you flexibility is a plus, and 4K is great for that.
 
if I were to pursue filmmaking I would grab the closest camera that produces material suitable for editing and doesn't suck to use hours on end. I'd use the rest of the budget on a basic rig. A good mic or two, a pocket dolly like in that video, a tripod, and editing software.
You just described a DSLR. Nice.
 
What is the general opinion on Final Cut Pro X these days? As a beginner I taught myself how to use Final Cut Express 4.0.1 and really liked it. It's basic and dated at this point but my 2009 iMac just wasn't powerful enough to get the most out of Final Cut Pro X when it came out, and it just sat on my hard drive collecting updates as they came out.

Last week I finally needed to get a new computer and got a 5k iMac. Since I've got a wedding to work on at the moment, I decided it was time to learn FCPX.

After some troubles, I'm pretty into it now. I edited the entire wedding in half the time it would have taken with Final Cut Express, and that included a lot of learning time. Especially coming from FCE, this software feels like magic on that computer. I'm editing way faster than I did before. It almost feels like cheating.

I know FCPX got a bad wrap when it came out but it seems like a lot's been added to it at this point. There are definitely some things I don't like about it, but it's probably my own fault for not completely understanding how everything works yet.
 
Autofocus is not a priority...
I only have experience with the cameras I own, which are Canon's 7D and 5D3. I love my 5D3 and have never had a problem with it. I use it mostly to take photos, but I also occasionally use it in my freelance work.

I'm a shooter/editor for PGA Tour, so if I need some B-roll of a golf course or have some kind of special project I'll bust it out and get some shots. I love how quickly I can work with it and the flexibility I have over a traditional ENG camera-- and the footage looks fantastic. It only takes 5 seconds to swap out a lens and get back to shooting. I also love that it had a headphone jack I can monitor audio with, and that I can adjust audio levels on the fly. And the low-light, high-iso capabilities are awesome.

The 5D3 works for me. Only thing I would change if I could would be giving me 60fps in 1080 and the option for 120fps in 720.
 
Is there any software that can tweak digital video modulation transfer function curve in post to be more filmlike, ie. lower contrast at higher frequencies, or are anti-aliasing filters so good these days that I can downsample from 8K to get the 35mm equivalent color resolution and sharpness?
 
What is the general opinion on Final Cut Pro X these days? As a beginner I taught myself how to use Final Cut Express 4.0.1 and really liked it. It's basic and dated at this point but my 2009 iMac just wasn't powerful enough to get the most out of Final Cut Pro X when it came out, and it just sat on my hard drive collecting updates as they came out.

Last week I finally needed to get a new computer and got a 5k iMac. Since I've got a wedding to work on at the moment, I decided it was time to learn FCPX.

After some troubles, I'm pretty into it now. I edited the entire wedding in half the time it would have taken with Final Cut Express, and that included a lot of learning time. Especially coming from FCE, this software feels like magic on that computer. I'm editing way faster than I did before. It almost feels like cheating.

I know FCPX got a bad wrap when it came out but it seems like a lot's been added to it at this point. There are definitely some things I don't like about it, but it's probably my own fault for not completely understanding how everything works yet.

I really like FCPX. It's so much faster editing 4K video than Premiere, and everything just makes more sense to me. I wish it had better plug-in support and linked to After Effects better, that's literally the only reason I'd use Premiere over it.
 
What is the general opinion on Final Cut Pro X these days? As a beginner I taught myself how to use Final Cut Express 4.0.1 and really liked it. It's basic and dated at this point but my 2009 iMac just wasn't powerful enough to get the most out of Final Cut Pro X when it came out, and it just sat on my hard drive collecting updates as they came out.

Last week I finally needed to get a new computer and got a 5k iMac. Since I've got a wedding to work on at the moment, I decided it was time to learn FCPX.

After some troubles, I'm pretty into it now. I edited the entire wedding in half the time it would have taken with Final Cut Express, and that included a lot of learning time. Especially coming from FCE, this software feels like magic on that computer. I'm editing way faster than I did before. It almost feels like cheating.

I know FCPX got a bad wrap when it came out but it seems like a lot's been added to it at this point. There are definitely some things I don't like about it, but it's probably my own fault for not completely understanding how everything works yet.

I like it, pretty simple and with a couple of add ons like Plural Eyes, Neat video and film convert it does everything i need.
 
Nice Chromeo edit! A buddy of mine would do the same trick, I always wondered what fun could be had by adding multiples in the same frame....time to play around!
 
Nice Chromeo edit! A buddy of mine would do the same trick, I always wondered what fun could be had by adding multiples in the same frame....time to play around!

Do it! When doing this I had a lot more ideas popping up in my head (playing more with the perspectives, doing "portal" stuff etc.) but since this was just for fun and had to be made fast, I had to stop myself. I'll definitely play around with it more though :)
 
KNfvJY0.jpg

Finished up yet another personal short film! Really happy with how it turned out.

It's about the incredible ambition of the 15 year old Isabel Kooring. Her immense love of dance set her on a path hardship, sacrifice and most importantly pleasure. Dance gives Isabel the feeling that you can change things with art and enrich the world. Because of this she travels each day to Rotterdam to work hard at her dream of becoming a dancer. Her family started a crowdfunding to help fund her long and expensive travels.

The parents are friends of a friend of mine and they asked if we could maybe help them out and we were really happy to do it!

Love to know what you guys think of it. I'd like to apologise in advance for the subtitles though lol.

Edit: Removed the link because since the film is used in a crowdfunding I wasn't allowed to use the music with my personal use license. I've got the film up with license free music but that's obviously not the best version of the film. Will share again when the crowdfunding is over!
 


Lovely! Great cinematography! One small criticism I would have (though it's kind of understandable given the short length of the video) is that there is a bit too much talk. I would have loved to feel/see what she feels while dancing without having her telling me. Like in the start, she starts talking before I have the time to get completely sucked in into the dance/imagery. Might have something to do with me having to read the subtitles though, it might work better when you can just listen.

Anyway, great work! I have loved the things you have posted here :)
 
Last edited:
Lovely! Great cinematography! One small criticism I would have (though it's kind of understandable given the short length of the video) is that there is a bit too much talk. I would have loved to feel/see what she feels while dancing without having her telling me. Like in the start, she starts talking before I have the time to get completely sucked in into the dance/imagery. Might have something to do with me having to read the subtitles though, it might work better when you can just listen.

Anyway, great work! I have loved the things you have posted here :)

I don't know if I should have made a separate post for this, but whatever:

Here's a small teaser for a documentary I'm making. It's about an electronic/ambient/improvisational/jazz festival called PUNKT in my hometown. Their concept is to have a concert and have a second artist do a live remix of it immediately afterwards. It's pretty big in that scene, people like John Paul Jones, Brian Eno and Laurie Anderson have been there, but few people in the outside world are aware of it, even in the town itself (some have heard the name, but have no idea what it is).

https://vimeo.com/129381603

Oh yeah definitely! Good point! While editing it I was really tempted to turn it into a 7-8 minute film because there was so much good and interesting stuff there. But I shot the film with the idea of a 2-3 minute film so the footage just didn't support it. Working on this film definitely sparked the ambition to create some longer format films, like 15-30 minutes long. Never done anything that long so that seems like a great challenge.

Thanks for watching!
 
Dude, LUTs all day, every day. It's so much fun to modify looks so fast. I'm being spoiled. To be fair, I'm looking forward to sessions with a colorist. It's a privilege, not right.

I don't really quite get LUT's. Would you care to explain them a bit? As far as I understand they are pretty much filters that you can apply to your footage. What LUT's do you use and are there any great free ones out there?

I'm not a great colorist so the idea of LUT's is really appealing. I currently use a mixture of both Davinci Resolve and Film Looks.
 
I don't really quite get LUT's. Would you care to explain them a bit? As far as I understand they are pretty much filters that you can apply to your footage. What LUT's do you use and are there any great free ones out there?

I'm not a great colorist so the idea of LUT's is really appealing. I currently use a mixture of both Davinci Resolve and Film Looks.

I'm just getting into LUTs myself. Basically, it's a sort of formula where the colour of each pixel is changed to it's equivalent on a specific film stock. So it's not only a filter, but how the colours relate to each other. It was originally used to match colour from film and digital to get the same overall look. I'm not good at explaining this, but yeah. Since I just started using the A7S, I needed something like that for my flat S-log-2 footage where simply pulling on the contrast wasn't enough. I'm not sure about free ones, but I bought the Osiris LUT where you can choose between different film stocks they physically have scanned.
 
I'm just getting into LUTs myself. Basically, it's a sort of formula where the colour of each pixel is changed to it's equivalent on a specific film stock. So it's not only a filter, but how the colours relate to each other. It was originally used to match colour from film and digital to get the same overall look. I'm not good at explaining this, but yeah. Since I just started using the A7S, I needed something like that for my flat S-log-2 footage where simply pulling on the contrast wasn't enough. I'm not sure about free ones, but I bought the Osiris LUT where you can choose between different film stocks they physically have scanned.

Any free luts worth getting?
 
So... 5d Mark IV exists. Saw a photographer use it in Toronto; she was doing promo shots for Canon. Unfortunately all video settings were disabled and I couldn't see anything besides knowing (through her words) that it has dual pixel focus.
 
Any recommendations for an audio harness? I'm going to be running sound for a feature shoot in late August, and am in the market for something that will distribute the weight of the mixer (TASCAM HS-P82 ~ 12 Pounds) more evenly than the single strap Porta-brace I have.

I've been looking at these two on B&H, but would love to hear from someone who actually uses one. I'm leaning toward the Sachtler one.

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1115083-REG/sachtler_sn605_heavy_duty_harness.html

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1063089-REG/porta_brace_ah_3hd_audio_harness_for.html

Also have you guys seen about the Zoom F8, an 8 track recorder for under a thousand dollars? Looks pretty stellar. It's their first product designed specifically for filmmakers.

https://www.zoom.co.jp/products/handy-recorder/zoom-f8-multitrack-field-recorder
 
So... 5d Mark IV exists. Saw a photographer use it in Toronto; she was doing promo shots for Canon. Unfortunately all video settings were disabled and I couldn't see anything besides knowing (through her words) that it has dual pixel focus.

Interesting. Though I have 0% fate in Canon making a competitive filmcamera of the 5D IV. The only way that camera will be interesting is if it will either shoot 4k, high frame-rate, good ISO and or has C-log. But you know that won't happen since that'll cannibalise the 1DC and the C100 line.
 
Hello friends, I made a thread asking for video help but will ask here too. I hope you can help me and thank you!

Hello friends,

I have a folder of a lot (like 300) of videos from an old camcorder. They are mp4 files. What I want to do is remove the first parts of each video since for some reason they all start with black screens, random noises/grunting, and static. I can't go into detail on what's on the video but the actual start time doesn't need to be exact and the content sort of loops, so as long as I can cut out the first bit everything would work.

Is there an easy way to remove the first say, 30-40 seconds of each video for 300+ videos? It can be the same time removed from every video, or even just a way to take just the middle 5 minutes from each video, or whatever would work to just get a chuck of the video minus the beginning, I don't need to actually have different times for each one. Also, I don't care too much if the quality goes down a bit, as long as they stay the same format and keep the same file names.

Hopefully there is a way to set this up and walk away? I don't want to do each one manually (I don't even know how to actually do it manually yet but I assume it can be done as I am aware video editing exists)

Thank you and please help

EDIT: Oh I am on windows if that matters.
 
uAKvTCU.png


Made this mockup for a super on Illustrator and I want it to kind of 'grow out' but fluidly...

Is there any way to parent the mask shapes of each layer so when one extends, the others follow?
 
Can you guys recommend good forums or places to learn about types of editing techniques. I just recently learned about match cutting and wipes, and was very intrigued. Looking to learn more about cool techniques like that
 
Guess I won't be going to public places while carrying gear in peli cases! I had rented some audio gear I was totally unfamiliar with yesterday and since I had some time to kill I decided to get something to drink at a Starbucks and sit down and test the gear. My GF was getting the drinks and I sat down at a table and opened up my peli case. I look up and see a group of around 10 people look at me with total terror. I looked back at them with confusion only to later realize they probably thought I was carrying a bomb or whatever. When I got out the wireless mics they relaxed and turned around.

Told the guys at the camera rental place about this story and told me the story about some gears loading up a van with tripods. They got surrounded by a police team similar to the SWAT because they though they were loading in weapons. Crazy.
 
Can you guys recommend good forums or places to learn about types of editing techniques. I just recently learned about match cutting and wipes, and was very intrigued. Looking to learn more about cool techniques like that
Post #2566 on the previous page has you covered.
 
I'm looking to buy a nice Cinema lens for a Canon DSLR.

I've been eyeing the Samyang/ Rokinon 24mm f/1.4 lenses, but I had some questions:

1) Are these the best lenses in their field, or are there others?
2) Is there a substantial difference for film between the regular and the T1.5 Cine lenses?
3) Is the cheapest option to buy the Sony A Mount version from BHPhoto and separately buy a Canon adapter?

Thanks for any help!
 
Been working on a pilot for a web series for a long while now...finally have some stuff to show.

Released the teaser yesterday:

https://vimeo.com/137621990

Here's a BTS on how we did that:

https://vimeo.com/137619785

And here's a VFX reel showing some of the work going into it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWR_T0ghs04
Looks great man!

Do you mind me asking how much time, effort, and budget goes into the green screen stuff strictly for those in-car driving shots?

I'm about to direct a short that takes place inside a parked car in three different locations, and location scouting is driving me insane. Since the car would be parked, I assume it'd be easy to edit in the (window) footage... but I don't want to assume anything.

Thoughts/opinions?
 
Just a small questions. How long is this web episode is going to be (roughly) and I am actually don't mind watching other people work to do some minor critique (if you like to).

The pilot, which is all we've shot so far, is 10 minutes (EXACTLY 10, I was quite proud of that).

The goal is to float it around a little bit and try and raise some funds to do 9 more 10m episodes. We'll see how it goes!
 
I'm looking to buy a nice Cinema lens for a Canon DSLR.

I've been eyeing the Samyang/ Rokinon 24mm f/1.4 lenses, but I had some questions:

1) Are these the best lenses in their field, or are there others?
2) Is there a substantial difference for film between the regular and the T1.5 Cine lenses?
3) Is the cheapest option to buy the Sony A Mount version from BHPhoto and separately buy a Canon adapter?

Thanks for any help!

1) They're probably the best cost for performance.
2) Same exact glass, only the bodies on the Cine lenses are built for video (declicked aperture and built in lens gears).
3) Go to ebay, look up the seller "bestpriceoptics". They are cheaper than anyone I've seen, and they don't charge tax or shipping.


Looks great man!

Do you mind me asking how much time, effort, and budget goes into the green screen stuff strictly for those in-car driving shots?

I'm about to direct a short that takes place inside a parked car in three different locations, and location scouting is driving me insane. Since the car would be parked, I assume it'd be easy to edit in the (window) footage... but I don't want to assume anything.

Thoughts/opinions?

This whole project was a minimal budget, crew worked for free for two days, stuff like that. Everything should be pretty high effort...do a pass, show someone, see what they say, do it again, keep refining. Once you have a good green screen key set up, it's quick for the rest. It's just getting that first one right. Making sure outside is blurring the correct amount for the lens you shot on. A good way to check for that is to drive to where you're going to green screen them into, and get a still photo (or video) of the shot with them parked. Look at how the background falls out of focus, look how the surroundings reflects on the car. Things like that. The details matter.

Green screen is by far the way to go. Shoot outside so that you are getting the real sunlight in the car and not faking it somewhere. If the car is supposed to be driving, you should drive around in the areas that it's supposed to take place and shoot as steady of video as you can. Every angle that you'll be showing. And don't forget to shoot out the windshield (pointed up at least 45 degrees) so you can put the reflections of the trees/buildings/whatever on the winshield (in SCREEN mode so that you only get clarity in the blacks).

One thing we learned is that if it's daytime, try and expose the green screen high. Since naturally it would blow out if you actually shot it live, it's okay if it blows out a bit. That VFX before and after wasn't with final color, the final looks more like this:

greenscreen.png


See the before (it's still RAW here), it's a very light green.
greenscreen_1.png


Since the car is naturally darker than outside, it looks natural for outside to blow out a bit.

If it's nighttime, I see a lot of people try and expose it nice and bright and this causes complications with the key. You want to have it roughly match the exposure of what you'll put outside. So still get a nice, evenly lit green/blue, but keep it dark enough so that you can see it (and pull the key), but that if there's any clipping, it won't look like this bright edge on the talent.
 
I'm delighted to see that a topic like this exists on GAF!

I've been on a small hiatus from my film endeavors, but I'm starting to get back into the swing of things.

Let me show y'all what I'm capable of: https://vimeo.com/114665642

I wish I had material to create a "making of" video, because that entire short was done by my hand (just my actress and I, and a lot of favors).

I see a lot of praise for DSLRs, but that film was done by my Sony CX-560v camcorder. It's a small little guy, but it's all about how you use your equipment, and your eye for framing. I'm serious, for those just starting off, don't shoot for the best tech, work with what works for you.

I'm getting ready to start pre-production on this screenplay I've written. I'm excited to post the finished product! It'll be sometime in the future, but it's gonna be good!
 
1) They're probably the best cost for performance.
2) Same exact glass, only the bodies on the Cine lenses are built for video (declicked aperture and built in lens gears).
3) Go to ebay, look up the seller "bestpriceoptics". They are cheaper than anyone I've seen, and they don't charge tax or shipping.

Wonderful, thanks!

Sadly I live in Canada, so any potential savings are ruined by shipping, conversion and import fees.

Why is the 24mm preferred over the 34mm?
 
Wonderful, thanks!

Sadly I live in Canada, so any potential savings are ruined by shipping, conversion and import fees.

Why is the 24mm preferred over the 34mm?

The Rokinon 35 is more preferred. The 24mm is the weak link in the lens lineup as it's pretty soft compared to the 35/50/85.

Still a good lens to have, though.
 
Top Bottom