• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The Gawker saga is over: Settled with Hulk Hogan and other litigants for $32 Million

Status
Not open for further replies.
Their own version of the story:

Today the founder of Gawker Media, Nick Denton, announced that his bankrupt company would settle claims with three litigants: the wrestler Hulk Hogan, the scientist Shiva Ayyadurai, and the journalist Ashley Terrill. According to documents filed in federal bankruptcy court, the three settlements total $32,250,000. In a post on his personal blog, Denton wrote, “After four years of litigation funded by a billionaire with a grudge going back even further, a settlement has been reached. The saga is over.”

Ayyadurai, who sued over several Gawker Media stories that cast doubt on his claims to have invented email in 1978 at the age of 14—seven years after internet pioneer Ray Tomlinson sent the first electronic message using the technology widely recognized by experts as underlying the contemporary email system—will receive $750,000. Terrill, who was the subject of a story published by Gawker about her involvement in a feud between the co-founders of the dating app Tinder, will receive $500,000. Hogan, who was awarded in $140,100,000 in damages over Gawker’s coverage and publication of a brief excerpt of a video in which he could be seen having sex, will receive the remaining $31,000,000. As part of the settlements, the stories about Ayyadurai, Terrill, and Hogan will be removed from Gawker’s website. Two other stories concerning Ayyadurai, which were published by Gizmodo, were deleted in September in the course of Univision’s acquisition of Gawker Media’s assets.

All three litigants were represented by the Los Angeles entertainment attorney Charles J. Harder, who received financial backing from the Silicon Valley billionaire Peter Thiel in a decade-long effort to destroy Gawker Media. Thiel publicly acknowledged funding Hogan’s lawsuit, but has given contradictory answers about his involvement in other cases. In May, he told the New York Times that he was in fact supporting other litigants against Gawker, but seemed to claim at a press conference this week that he supported Hogan’s case alone.

In his post announcing the settlements, Denton argued that Gawker Media anticipated prevailing against the Harder-backed litigants—echoing his initial response to the enormous Hogan verdict handed down in March. “We have had our day in trial court, and we lost,” he wrote at the time. “We will have our day back in appeals court, and we will be vindicated.” Several months later, in June, the judge overseeing the Hogan trial refused to stay the verdict to allow Gawker Media to appeal, forcing the company to declare bankruptcy and sell six of its seven sites to Univision. Shortly thereafter, Thiel vowed to support Hogan through the lengthy and expensive appeals process.

Thiel’s promise apparently changed Denton’s calculation. An “all-out legal war with Thiel would have cost too much, and hurt too many people, and there was no end in sight,” Denton wrote today, citing Harder’s decision to target individual writers and editors, like former Gawker writer Sam Biddle, current Gizmodo Media Group executive editor John Cook, and former Gawker editor-in-chief A.J. Daulerio—who has been subject to excruciating collection efforts from Hogan’s attorneys despite having a net worth of negative $27,000. “The Valley billionaire, famously relentless, had committed publicly to support Hulk Hogan beyond the appeal and ‘until his final victory.’ Gawker’s nemesis was not going away.”

While Denton suggests that the settlement means a victorious Thiel will finally stop prosecuting his vendetta against the company and its employees, Harder has continued to threaten the company’s successor, Gizmodo Media, with ruinous litigation. Harder even targeted individual staffers, like Cook, over critical comments in the press. Given the titanic sum Harder secured for Hulk Hogan—nearly a third of Gawker Media’s sale price—there is no reason to believe that Harder and Thiel’s battle-tested strategy for silencing critical journalism is going away any time soon. Suing news outlets over accurate stories continues to be a lucrative business. And Thiel has money to burn.

Probably shouldn't end with a dig at people when they outed persons who proceeded to sue them.
 

GeeTeeCee

Member
"Silencing critical journalism." Yes, because the whole world needed to know about a fucking Hulk Hogan sex tape.

And in the end, wasn't it a jury that decided Gawker had crossed the line? All of the money in the world funding the case wouldn't have mattered one bit, if the jury decided Gawker were in the right.
 
"Silencing critical journalism." Yes, because the whole world needed to know about a fucking Hulk Hogan sex tape.

And after this comment, here we go with the usual suspects who seem to want to die on this hill flooding into this thread....

The sort of complex Gawker has over this is infuriating, but they got their ass handed to them.
 

Cagey

Banned
Thiel is a rich Trump supporter, Hogan is racist, neither fact means Hogan's sex tape should have been public in any way or that he deserved it.
 
Thiel is a rich Trump supporter, Hogan is racist, neither fact means Hogan's sex tape should have been public in any way.

Exactly. Yet some people seem to believe that because of these facts, and alongside Gawker playing incredibly loose in court orders that said to take down the video, essentially flaunting it in the face of the law, that means that they are in the right.
 

Breads

Banned
I'm not too fond of the idea of a bigot getting such a big payout but as long as the beast is slain I guess there is a net win for humanity in there somewhere.
 

ghostjoke

Banned
So ends the hope that the money would vanish into the ether and Hogan would somehow end up with nothing. I'll take Denton and Daulerio getting some comeuppances.
 

Blader

Member
The broader principle and implications of this whole thing make me uneasy, but for this specific case, I've got no sympathy for Denton or Gawker.
 

entremet

Member
Awesome!

Won't miss you, Gawker. Too bad they idiots at the top, ignored a court order and cost many their jobs.
 

HariKari

Member
Looks like they haven't learned a goddamn thing.

What about the claims against Denton personally? settled as well?
 
Morals of this story:

1) Don't ignore or defy court orders.
2) Don't make an ass of yourself in court and treat it like a joke.
3) Don't out billionaires private lives without their consent and expect not to get hit back eventually.
4) Hogan always goes over.
 

Kayhan

Member
2) Don't make an ass of yourself in court and treat it like a joke.

It boggles my mind how that one Gawker dude acted in court. I guess he thought he was untouchable or something.

Was that the guy forced to sell his apartment or was that Nick Denton?
 

CDX

Member
Considering this was Hulk Hogan's financial situation just a few years ago when he got divorced. I'm sure he's happy with the $31 Million settlement check.
Hulk Hogan's 2009 Divorce settlement
http://www.eonline.com/news/276772/hulk-and-linda-hogan-s-divorce-settlement-revealed


The settlement was confidential—until this week, when it was attached to a new motion filed in court records and became public.

So who got the short end of the stick?

The St. Petersburg Times reports Hogan's former wife received a little more than 70 percent of the couple's liquid assets, along with 40 percent ownership in his various companies. He also paid her an additional $3 million property settlement, which was partly pocketed from the sale of their beach house.

The paper reports Linda received $7.44 million of the couple's $10.41 million held in bank and investment accounts, but Hulk will not pay her alimony.


Linda also got to keep a Mercedes-Benz, a Cadillac Escalade, a Corvette, a Rolls-Royce and various off-road vehicles. Her ex, who allegedly has a fine collection of vehicles, kept the rest, but they aren't identified in the agreement.

It's a shame, the money had to go to a racist asshole like Hogan.

But I truly don't feel sorry AT ALL for Nick Denton or A.J. Daulerio.
 
For a blog that outs gay people for money, participates in gay-shaming blackmail campaigns for money, contributes to blackmail schemes for money, and uploads private people's sex tapes for money, the persecution complex that Gawker has over this whole escapade is just disgustingly delicious.
 

MogCakes

Member
I dislike both Hogan and Denton so seeing them try to destroy each other has been entertaining to say the least.
 
Well technically, "Hulk Hogan had sex with a friend's wife, and here's the video to prove it" is technically an accurate story, it's just completely non-newsworthy, and even if you thought it was, you can report on it without posting the actual sex tape. Fuck Gawker.
 

GuyKazama

Member
Could Gawker have still won, or didn't he just want to wait?

Gawker likely proposed the settlement, because they didn't want to drag it out, and/or didn't want to incur the legal costs.

Hogan likely took it because odds were the judgement could have been reduced, vacated, and also didn't want to drag it out.

$30 million is still a lot, so I'd say Gawker was concerned they would be paying something in the end.
 

NandoGip

Member
I'm on gawkers side sorry. None of you give a shit about other sex tapes that have leaked. Hulk hogan is a POS racist anyways. Silencing journalism by throwing money at the court system is the big deal here and sets a terrible precedent the affects how information is spread. If a rich dude can sue a news website into bankruptcy over anything then reporters are going to hold back on revealing things because of the risk
 
I'm on gawkers side sorry. None of you give a shit about other sex tapes that have leaked. Hulk hogan is a POS racist anyways. Silencing journalism by throwing money at the court system is the big deal here and sets a terrible precedent the affects how information is spread. If a rich dude can sue a news website into bankruptcy over anything then reporters are going to hold back on revealing things because of the risk

So you are okay with revenge porn?

Your second point is bullshit. Gawker themselves have used their money and power to push the legal system in their favor, now a bigger bully came along and did it to them. Fuck them and anybody who thinks posting revenge porn is "journalism". Yes, a rich dude can sue a website into bankruptcy if said website acts completely irresponsibly and reprehensibly and breaks the law. Let me find the world's smallest violin for them.
 
I'm on gawkers side sorry. None of you give a shit about other sex tapes that have leaked. Hulk hogan is a POS racist anyways. Silencing journalism by throwing money at the court system is the big deal here and sets a terrible precedent the affects how information is spread. If a rich dude can sue a news website into bankruptcy over anything then reporters are going to hold back on revealing things because of the risk

what about new stories posting the social security numbers, addresses, and significant others of trump voters?

those would be accurate news stories.
 
I'm on gawkers side sorry. None of you give a shit about other sex tapes that have leaked. Hulk hogan is a POS racist anyways. Silencing journalism by throwing money at the court system is the big deal here and sets a terrible precedent the affects how information is spread. If a rich dude can sue a news website into bankruptcy over anything then reporters are going to hold back on revealing things because of the risk

A) What happened here isn't journalism. Pure and simple

B) There is a responsibility that comes into play when reporting news. It seems like that's been forgotten. I've seen too many reporters act irresponsibily.

C) Who are you to say I didn't care about other leaked sex tapes?
 

entremet

Member
I'm on gawkers side sorry. None of you give a shit about other sex tapes that have leaked. Hulk hogan is a POS racist anyways. Silencing journalism by throwing money at the court system is the big deal here and sets a terrible precedent the affects how information is spread. If a rich dude can sue a news website into bankruptcy over anything then reporters are going to hold back on revealing things because of the risk

Can't cosign revenge porn. And racist pieces of shits still have rights. If we instituted morality tests for basics rights we would be going down a terrible rabbit hole.
 
Never forget

screen%20shot%202016-03-20%20at%208.42.48%20am.png
 

NandoGip

Member
Lol poor Hulk Hogan. You guys act as if this case was about the sex tape and not something else entirely. This was a billionaire abusing the court system to destroy a news organization, and he succeeded!

Sure, Hulk Hogan did not technically deserve what happened to him, and Gawker fucked up, but what actually happened is so much bigger.
 
Never forget

screen%20shot%202016-03-20%20at%208.42.48%20am.png

"Journalism."
Lol poor Hulk Hogan. You guys act as if this case was about the sex tape and not something else entirely. This was a billionaire abusing the court system to destroy a news organization, and he succeeded!

Sure, Hulk Hogan did not technically deserve what happened to him, and Gawker fucked up, but what actually happened is so much bigger.

You're acting like this is going to set some sort of precedent, but all this is doing is reinforcing a person's right to privacy. Gawker doesn't have a leg to stand on morally or legally.
 

Kayhan

Member
I'm on gawkers side sorry. None of you give a shit about other sex tapes that have leaked. Hulk hogan is a POS racist anyways. Silencing journalism.

It wasn't journalism. It was revenge porn.

How about Gawker Editor-In-Chief Daulerio saying they would publish sex tapes - unless it featured a child under 4. That apparently was the limit. Over 5 is OK.

The people running Gawker were trash.
 
Lol poor Hulk Hogan. You guys act as if this case was about the sex tape and not something else entirely. This was a billionaire abusing the court system to destroy a news organization, and he succeeded!

Sure, Hulk Hogan did not technically deserve what happened to him, and Gawker fucked up, but what actually happened is so much bigger.

Gawker is not a "news organization."
What they write isn't "news"

It's shit.
Just publishing words on the internet does not make you a news organization.

If you read Gawker, you are more dumb than if you did not read Gawker that day. You are less informed than if you didn't read Gawker that day. And y'know, there's nothing wrong with wanting to be more dumb or with Gawker wanting to make people more dumb. Plenty of publishers have that interest every day, and plenty of people want to read things that make them less informed, that's normal and okay, and not a reason to shut anything down.

All this time, Gawker has been trying to pretend like they're the New York Times revealing grand truths and standing up to power through journalism. They're not. They're a libelous rag sheet that breaks the law. If there were three parties in this Gawker/Hogan/Thiel escepade, only one of them is breaking the law and it's Gawker.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom