how so? She traded one year of DS9 for four years of Becker, that's pretty good.In retrospect leaving DS9 wasn't a great career move.
They can cancel the show on short notice no matter what, long term contracts don't stopmthat. They could have given the entire cast new five year contracts after season six and still could have cancelled the show after season 7 releasing the cast and be done with it.She knew the show was "near" the end, in that they had switched from multi-year contracts to one-year contracts, that way they could cancel the series on short notice, ...
Speaking of final season stuff in Star Trek. I'm still salty that Voyager ends so abruptly and we never get to see the crew re-assimilate into society or reunite with lost friends/family
They can cancel the show on short notice no matter what, long term contracts don't stopmthat. They could have given the entire cast new five year contracts after season six and still could have cancelled the show after season 7 releasing the cast and be done with it.
A lot fewer shows would get cancelled if the producers were obligated to a cast contract beyond the end of the show heh.
So I'm finally in season 4, I think the biggest issue with Voyager (so far) is that there is nothing memorable about it. I've watched almost 100 episodes and the most memorable thing about it is how badly the writers mess up interesting plots.
I think the borg/species 8472 episode has been my favorite so far.
I mean, starring as the romantic lead against Ted Danson, even in his post-Cheers grey-hair years, has to mean something if you care about trying to transition out of the Trek acting ghetto.I wouldn't even pretend to know the details relating to contract penalties involved with cancelling a show early, but they've got to be more than "nothing" because why else would contracts be a thing?
Trek apparently offered plenty of multi-year contracts as the shows got started, but then they scaled it back to one year at a time as the shows started to wind down.
Farrell apparently said that one of the reasons she left DS9 and signed on with Becker was because DS9 was offering one year at a time contracts, and Becker offered her a multi-year contract. Now it's obvious that Becker could have bombed and been cancelled right out of the gate, while Farrell herself wasn't even convinced that this was the end of DS9, but... a multi-year contract has to mean something in order for it to be advantageous.
Yep. Voyager tends to blow all of its big moments. I think both Scorpion and Eclipse are pretty bad.
Year of Hell is such a good idea...and then they run through most of the good stuff in the first episode.
I wouldn't even pretend to know the details relating to contract penalties involved with cancelling a show early, but they've got to be more than "nothing" because why else would contracts be a thing?
Trek apparently offered plenty of multi-year contracts as the shows got started, but then they scaled it back to one year at a time as the shows started to wind down.
Sometimes Voyager has a couple of great ideas...done better in the other series. Jetrel is an honestly great episode...if Duet never existed. Same with Nothing Human.
This is my short list of the best Voyager episodes
Someone to Watch Over Me
Relativity
Worst Case Scenario
One
Tinker Tenor Doctor Spy
The Voyager Conspiracy
Live Fast and Prosper
Night
Living Witness
Course:Oblivion
This is actually a lot of episodes yet I'd put none of them among the best of DS9/TNG episodes, nor the best TOS episodes. I'd put them all ahead of the best ENT episodes, another show that I think has trouble making anything really great.
Yep, both of those are great.I would off the top of my head add "The Void" and "Counterpoint" to that list. The latter is probably one of the strongest 'solo' episodes Janeway gets and has probably one of the best guest performances anyone got to do on the show as well.
I guess the Romulans did try to steal that Andy Dick ship. Although I can't remember if that was during or after the Dominion war.
I guess the Romulans did try to steal that Andy Dick ship. Although I can't remember if that was during or after the Dominion war.
My headcanon was always that the Romulans reverted back to the pre-Dominion War status quo after the Dominion War happened. I wouldn't see them being allies much at all since they were basically dragged into the Dominion War in the first place.
It does.Some people seem to think Voyager starts with S3 of DS9,
Message in a bottle is a season 4 episode, that puts it into season 6 of DS9.putting Message in a Bottle during S7 of DS9.
Just watched message in a bottle, I liked it
Andy Dick wasn't entirely insufferable. But outside of that, the episode was fun and definitely offered something fresh and good that the show needed.
I'm fascinated with the unification stuff for Romulans. One of the event chains I keep meaning to write for the New Horizons mod for Stellaris covers the area.It's also worth considering Romulus got wiped even in the Prime Timeline. I can see the Romulans becoming chummier with the Federation in a move akin to the glasnost of The Undiscovered Country, because being friends with the Federation is way better than being their enemy and having had the heart cut out of your empire. Likewise I could even see reunification becoming a real possibility even without Spock there.
I can't really remember the episode, but I seem to remember that they were just out numbered, so it was either destroy the array or give it to the Kazon.Really it's weird that Star Trek's writers (and sci-fi TV in general) doesn't do even the barest necessity of explaining why you can't just tech away some problems. "Caretaker" is a weird example, in that it has one of those "guidance system is off.... I'll have to pilot it manually" moments, but of course it's not a death sentence because Chakotay remembered there is a transporter so he doesn't have to do some honorable death bull. But then no one even discusses an alternate away to use the Array and destroy it when they're gone (remote explosives?) Even if the answer is just "we have no time to rig a device and we can't be sure it'll go off when we're gone", that would have been better than what we got.
There really wasn't another Starfleet crew member qualified to take over for kes other than tom?
I mean, starring as the romantic lead against Ted Danson, even in his post-Cheers grey-hair years, has to mean something if you care about trying to transition out of the Trek acting ghetto.
He had a couple of biochemistry courses in the academy.
Yeah, I dunno either, other than conservation of characters and the fact that he and the Doc probably had one of the best repartees until Seven came along.
Seven would have been a more logical choice, was Voyager really that low budget that they couldn't keep Kes in a reduced role?
I feel like there was some gossipy reason they got rid of the actress. Drugs or something. But yeah, I thought Kes was becoming an interesting character with her telekinesis and Tuvok being her mentor.
I thought it was down to scrapping either Kim or Kes and Garret Wang appeared on some Hollywood hot list.
I feel like there was some gossipy reason they got rid of the actress. Drugs or something. But yeah, I thought Kes was becoming an interesting character with her telekinesis and Tuvok being her mentor.
The producers wanted to spice up the show and reinvigorate it by adding a sexy new cast member (Jeri Ryan).I thought it was down to scrapping either Kim or Kes and Garret Wang appeared on some Hollywood hot list.