87% on rotten tomatoes is not divided opinions. Titanic got 88%. When 9 out of ten think it's good, that's not divided.
Cipherr said:I think its long past time to stop pretending that some people weren't underwhelmed by TDKR. That quote is not the first, and it wont be the last person you see or hear say that they felt the movie was a step down from the second one. I can understand if you disagree, but its probably time to stop feigning surprise.
Nothing brings out the saltiness in people like Nolan, seriously seems to get peoples backs up that he's credited among the best directors working today. He deservedly has a place on this list because seemingly everyone has an opinion on him
Drive was a really bad movie. But it was better than anything Nolan has directed.
I'm starting to worry that Gilroy had one brilliant moment in Michael Clayton, and it might never re-emerge. I know he's busy with Bourne so maybe he'll get back to that stuff eventually, but Duplicity did not ease my fears of that.I'm more shocked at the absence of populist auteurs like Peter Berg or Tony Gilroy.
Hello Joss.Question:
Would there have been any LIST at all with the correct order that everyone would have agreed with?
Yeah thought so. So what is the point of arguing where such and such director landed? Its not a definitive list. It has no implications. Its one person/magazine's opinion. Of course everyone thinks differently.
Hello Joss.
Trying to disguise yourself with that Batman avatar. So sneaky
Question:
Would there have been any LIST at all with the correct order that everyone would have agreed with?
Yeah thought so. So what is the point of arguing where such and such director landed? Its not a definitive list. It has no implications. Its one person/magazine's opinion. Of course everyone thinks differently.
I'm sure you could come up with a list where most people look at it and go "ok, I can see where they're coming from." That list would certainly not contain directors with only one film on their resume.
Auto correct fucked up his last name for you there. You should watch out for that.Steven Soderbergh is better than everyone on that list including gaf's love PTA.
Steven Soderbergh is better than everyone on that list including gaf's love PTA.
Auto correct fucked up his last name for you there. You should watch out for that.
Traffic was excellent. This list is very I dunno. Where's Wong Kar Wai?
Well not everybody can be a one man acting/directing tour de force like Guttenberg.Spiel is better than most of the list but he is the second best Steven working today.
Yeah, where IS Wong Kar-Wai? I've been waiting for him to do something great for too long, the sequel to In The Mood For Love was good, but you know what I mean.Traffic was excellent. This list is very I dunno. Where's Wong Kar Wai?
Yeah, where IS Wong Kar-Wai? I've been waiting for him to do something great for too long, the sequel to In The Mood For Love was good, but you know what I mean.
Directing the Grandmaster.
I repeat:
Get over it.
Steven Soderbergh is better than everyone on that list including gaf's love PTA.
Watch out for Cameron fan's spite!Joss Whedon!
Uh yeah, your opinion is wrong. There is no divided opinion over TDKR, 9 out of 10 people like it.
Uh yeah, your opinion is wrong. There is no divided opinion over TDKR, 9 out of 10 people like it.
Drive is really overrated.
I would be okay with more people like Whedon and Nolan working in the industry, assuming there isn't an even better alternative.Hasn't Bela Tarr stated The Turin Horse to be his final film?
Not that he's not wonderful, but that sort of implies him to not be an exciting auteur for the future or w/e.
Anyway, the list is by and large trash, though I'm happy to see Malick, Noe, and McQueen on there, and mystified by the inclusion of someone so relatively obscure and bizarre as Leos Carax in the rather bland company of the Whedons and Nolans of the world.