maquiladora
Member
Another positive review. 4.5 stars out of 5...
Nice. Hopefully no hometown bias there...
Another positive review. 4.5 stars out of 5...
So from what I gather, the Star Trek Into Darkness preview will only be at IMAX cinemas that project celluloid 70mm film.....digital IMAX will get nothing even if they have the giant screen with the proper aspect ratio, and LIEMAX will get nothing.
So that means if you want to see Star Trek there will probably no 3D, and definitely no 48 FPS. Is this correct? Seems like a pretty nasty tradeoff. Not sure what I'd do -- fortunately I don't live anywhere near an IMAX still using analog projection.
Damnit, don't ruin my suspension of disbelief! Don't ruin these movies for me!
You're worrying about which theater to go to based off of a preview for an upcoming movie? Really? I don't know. It seems bizarre to worry about a 2-3 minute preview in contrast to the picture quality of the 3 hour film you're about to watch. Are you trying to avoid it or?
It's pretty obvious if you go back and watch them. A lot of the CGI stands out, especially gollum in TTT. The wargs in TTT look really bad now too. CGI has improved a lot over the past 10 years.
Actually, I'm on Fandango right now, looking at one of the theaters that will be showing it at 48FPS. "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey HFR IMAX 3D".They are calling it "HFR" - look for that next the name. Fandango doesn't tell you, but MovieTickets does. Best is to just buy the tickets from your theater direct.
the only time I really was taken out of the movie due to cgi was the legolas troll battle. reminded me of early harry potter effectsIt's pretty obvious if you go back and watch them. A lot of the CGI stands out, especially gollum in TTT. The wargs in TTT look really bad now too. CGI has improved a lot over the past 10 years.
-Says Tolkien's story is part of the problem, as the story isn't believable.
the only time I really was taken out of the movie due to cgi was the legolas troll battle. reminded me of early harry potter effects
A more negative review. 2.5 stars out of 5.
http://letterboxd.com/adamwaldowski/film/the-hobbit-an-unexpected-journey/
Key points:
-'I wouldn't see another film projected at 48 fps if I were held at gunpoint'
-Story felt too episodic
-Uses too much LOTR nostalgia
-LOTR felt more cohesive
-Says Tolkien's story is part of the problem, as the story isn't believable
-High points were Gollum and Bilbo's one-liners
The same site has a review from someone else that gives it 4.5 out of 5.
http://letterboxd.com/kenru/film/the-hobbit-an-unexpected-journey/
It seems to be a user review site. There are 577 reviews of Argo.
are you implying the cave troll cg is on the same level as that?
because, hyperbole
10 years lest WB want their licensing agreement to be nulled.I think the other valid point was that this would probably be the last time we'll see Middle Earth in film form, so let's make the most of it!
Edmond Dantès;45021422 said:10 years lest WB want their licensing agreement to be nulled.
Hobbit enters public domain in 2032, LOTR 2050.
New extended clip.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qAZNlPGbD54#t=2m38s
Talk about butchering the timeline.
We're being hunted!
That's not their decision. WB will milk the I.P's for all their worth before the public domain issue. If not Middle-earth enterprises will move on to another studio. It's their property, this has nothing do with a cast member or a director who will have nothing to do with Middle-earth after the trilogy finishes.Richarad Armitage and Peter Jackson have commented on the fact they highly doubt there will be any remakes of LOTR or The Hobbit in their lifetime. There is no reason to remake LOTR in 10 years, it just is too definitive as it is.
I just don't think WB can remake the franchise in 10 years time even if they desired to do so. LOTR as it is is far too definitive. I can't see anyone on the creative side wanting to remake it, PJ's trilogy was just too critically successful to attempt to redo and it is such a massive under-taking. I don't think there is a single person who wants it remade.Edmond Dantès;45021709 said:That's not their decision. WB will milk the I.P's for all their worth before the public domain issue. If not Middle-earth enterprises will move on to another studio. It's their property, this has nothing do with a cast member or a director.
No one with a love for PJ's trilogy will want a remake, but the executives at Middle-earth enterprises... that's a different story unfortunately. The purists as well, but I don't think any director's vision of Middle-earth would ever satisfy them.I just don't think WB can remake the franchise in 10 years time even if they desired to do so. LOTR as it is is far too definitive. I can't see anyone on the creative side wanting to remake it, PJ's trilogy was just too critically successful to attempt to redo and it is such a massive under-taking. I don't think there is a single person who wants it remade.
-Says Tolkien's story is part of the problem, as the story isn't believable
Edmond Dantès;45021937 said:No one with a love for PJ's trilogy will want a remake, but the executives at Middle-earth enterprises... that's a different story unfortunately. The purists as well, but I don't think any director's vision of Middle-earth would ever satisfy them.
It would have to be done some different way to generate interest. Possibly a mini-series, or something like Game of Thrones. Even then, I don't know.
The only thing I can see making sense is something that Dantes brought up before, which is to make an animated LOTR trilogy. It will bring in shit loads of money and it wouldn't compete with PJ's trilogy.
Kind of surprised that there isn't a Hobbit tie-in game yet. Although, I can see the reasoning behind that. All the LOTR films were self contained stories part of one grand overarching narrative. The same can't be said of The Hobbit.The only thing I can see making sense is something that Dantes brought up before, which is to make an animated LOTR trilogy. It will bring in shit loads of money and it wouldn't compete with PJ's trilogy.
But we also shouldn't underestimate video games, especially since the upcoming consoles will produce extremely cinematic visuals. Call of Duty is usually the biggest entertainment launch of the year, so there's definitely money to be made from a great next-gen LOTR video game.
Edmond Dantès;45023055 said:Kind of surprised that there isn't a Hobbit tie-in game yet.
Edmond Dantès;45023055 said:Kind of surprised that there isn't a Hobbit tie-in game yet. Although, I can see the reasoning behind that. All the LOTR films were self contained stories part of one grand overarching narrative. The same can't be said of The Hobbit.
Edmond Dantès;45023055 said:Kind of surprised that there isn't a Hobbit tie-in game yet. Although, I can see the reasoning behind that. All the LOTR films were self contained stories part of one grand overarching narrative. The same can't be said of The Hobbit.
I can see Ann and Richard Taylor getting Oscar nominations, but winning seems beyond them with the likes of Paco Delgado (Les Miserables) and Jacqueline Durran (Anna Karenina) to contend with.Nice interview with costume designer Ann Maskrey.
Love her comment: "It was lovely doing things for Cate Blanchett, but she could make a plastic bag look good."
Edmond Dantès;45023055 said:Kind of surprised that there isn't a Hobbit tie-in game yet.
Good thing they have 3 changes to win.Edmond Dantès;45023671 said:I can see Ann and Richard Taylor getting Oscar nominations, but winning seems beyond them with the likes of Paco Delgado (Les Miserables) and Jacqueline Durran (Anna Karenina) to contend with.
Those do look like good fun, but I was thinking of something more like this:Well, there are two free web-based games to play...
The Hobbit: Kingdoms of Middle-Earth
https://www.kabam.com/the-hobbit-kingdoms
The Hobbit: Armies of the Third Age
https://www.kabam.com/the-hobbit-armies
And there's also Guardians of Middle-Earth, an Arena RPG for PS3 & 360, that has 'official tie-ins' with The Hobbit films.
http://www.guardiansofmiddleearth.com/home
If anyone in LA is interested.
Edmond Dantès;45023944 said:Those do look like good fun, but I was thinking of something more like this:
Edmond Dantès;45023944 said:Those do look like good fun, but I was thinking of something more like this:
I had a lot of fun with these (I don't think there was one for the FotR). Much better than your typical movie tie-in game.
Whenever one of the characters were on top of the cave troll in FOTR, Legolas in particular, it looks pretty awful now.
Well, they've managed before:
Edmond Dantès;45025168 said:Vue confirms HFR 3D locations.
Acton
Bolton
Bristol Cribbs Causeway
Bury
Camberley
Dublin
Edinburgh Omni
Exeter
Finchley North
Finchley Road
Fulham
Halifax
Harrow
Hull
Islington
Leeds Kirkstall
Livingston
Newcastle-under-Lyme
Norwich
Oxford
Plymouth
Portsmouth
Reading
Staines
Swansea
Watford
Westfield London
Westfield Stratford
York