-jinx- said:Lifetime, I'm pretty close to even. My worst gambling outing, I lost $200, and I've won $50-100 on a couple of trips. I guess I don't care enough to keep exact numbers...
As to how to cut into the losses, I don't know if there is a quick fix. Expectation value means that the more you play, the more you lose...unless you're very lucky. Try to avoid online gambling, and stick to games where the house edge isn't so daunting (blackjack or craps). Sports gambling is the kiss of death, as far as I can tell -- I don't know anyone who does well at it over a long period of time.
Doesn't always work, doesn't go according to the original plan most of the time. And I've worked for over a year in a very high profile offshore sportsbetting agency (was line-man actually) so I know what I'm talking about.Cubsfan23 said:I'm thinking about signing up for online gambling sites that offer huge bonuses, play the mimimum tables to meet requirements, and then withdraw everything.
Cubsfan23 said:I'm thinking about signing up for online gambling sites that offer huge bonuses, play the mimimum tables to meet requirements, and then withdraw everything.
McLesterolBeast said:Over the past 2 years, I'm up roughly $3,500 from poker (mostly from a 2,500 tournament win last week). I got lucky with the tournament, but ive been consistently (on average) up with friends and at casinos otherwise.
From other card games and machines at casinos, from what i remember i _feel_ that im up, but since i havent kept detailed records of those wins/losses it's probably on account of the fact that i more vividly remember the winning situations. More likely than not im down, but not for large amounts since i very rarely play table games or slots and when i do, it's for small amounts. I'd guess that im down $200 or $300 at most, at best - im marginally up.
From scratch cards im down, probably in the area of $100 from when i was much younger.
At bingo (yes, bingo), im up probably approximately $1,500, if not more. I'm still not sure if it's attributable to retardedly good luck, or the fact that most of the old people who play are too senile to recognize that they've won, making those of us who aren't senile far more likely to win. I've won a $1,000 prize on three different occasions, though it was split all but one time with a friend. I've won $500 multiple times, though same with the splitting.
I'd say that poker is the only thing that's sustainable. Sports betting, table betting, scratch cards and slots are all losing games, no matter what any one persons results may suggest and no matter what that person may say. I'm not sure about bingo. The power of old lady senility may be strong.
you must be joking?
Your telling me that casino is not a loosing buissnes?
bingo is not a matter of chance and luck?
the house always wins in the end, you will see!
sportsbetting is the best way to make money on, IF you know what your doing!
but 99% of the people that bet does not know what they are doing!
its not about luck its pure information and odds that makes you win money in the end![/
i been working in the sportsbetting buissnes for 5 years now and i see alot of stupid people who lose alot of money on it, not to talk about the online casinos that some poor guy places his "food" money on.
all i can say is do not bet if you dont have sources within the sports world that can give you info about injuries and other useful information.
i am lucky as i work with a company that gets all the info, see what the pro punters bet on and we can see what games are fixed.
so thats how i make a profit, sportsbetting is a fulltime job and the few people that are good at it makes shit loads of money!
Hey cubsfan i remember meeting you on an online poker client, havent seen you since then
Rorschach said:500 bucks is the most I've ever lost. It just doesn't feel like real money when it's in chip form. :[
McLesterolBeast said:Games that are played against the house aren't beatable. The two i mentioned as beatable are not.
If you have inside information, it has to be information that is unknown to proline, or whatever betting agency you're using, to be effective. Unless _you're_ the booky, that is. It's a lot like a stock market, where the going rate or in this case, the paid odds, are determined by all known relevant information. The vast, vast majority of success cases are prolonged statistical irregularities. Proline makes it their business to offer bad bets exclusively. Knowing what the "pros" know is effectively worthless if the professionals have factored it into their paid odds. An uninformed bet is, honest to god, insignificantly worse off than an informed bet. The only way to profit is to know more than the professionals know.
Cubsfan23 said:Wasn't me
McLesterolBeast said:If you work as a bookie, it's obviously different - seeing as you're the one giving people shitty bets. I know friends who've done the same. You can often give people outrageously bad bets. Only problem is, you need a way to enforce debts (same friend who ran a bookie business has fucked over other bookies that couldnt enforce his debts) and you have to be making pretty substantial profits to justify the risk of getting caught.
I dont see why anyone would ever need an odds compiler though. The major sports betting businesses already have them worked out for you and basically. Just take the odds they pay for a given event (team A beats team B), subtracted from the opposite (team B beats team A) and that pretty much gives you the information to figure out the cut that they're taking off per bet. As long as you never pay better than those values, you'll be good. Manipulate the numbers around a bit, and you can fool the average idiot sports fan into thinking they're favorable bets. You can even shave an additional percentage point or two off from what the big companies are charging and get away with it.