Huh, didnt know actually game journalist posted here as well. Cool
Never understood the whole "clickbait" myth or the paid off reviewer sentiment that pervades forums. Every game has flaws and perfection is an objective ideal. What may be minor to someone may be a large con for another. That's why a range of review scores exist. But I've always found that matters is the content of a review, not the score. Some people get enraged if a game gets a 7 or 8, but if the reviewer gave a thoughtful detailed explanation of what they considered bad or unpolished, who cares about the score?