The Last of Us - Review Thread [Emargo up, scores in OP.]

Status
Not open for further replies.
we all know polygon is ms-pr and destructoid just clickbaits with reviews.....

Destructoid isn't as bad in that respect as it used to be. I still try to avoid visiting the site as much as possible, but the sensationalist reviews aren't nearly as frequent now I've noticed.
 
Yes..but I know, from my gaming experience, that there are many times when you just get burned out from the game and it's mechanics from simply playing it to long, and would benefit from some breaks here and there.

Plus, giving yourself some time to soak in what you just experienced would benefit yourself as a review as well I imagine.

Well, different tastes. I am also a busy man and I happen to have one single vacation day in my very busy week. Different working practices I guess.
I get burned out quickly with games but there are these few games I can't stop playing (like Tomb Raider) and I hope The Last of Us will be one of those. If not, then of course it'll take more time to review no doubt.

Now let's get back to talk about the actual game and its wonderful reviews (so far). ;)
 
Fun fact: The whole "negative reviews for clickbait" shit is a total myth. Any site of reasonable influence will find their reviews gain high traffic regardless of score. In fact, my most popular ever reviews (Skyrim and BioShock) were 10s.

Of course, ascribing an ulterior motive to a review is a nice way of avoiding the acceptance of an alternate opinion.
 
Fun fact: The whole "negative reviews for clickbait" shit is a total myth. Any site of reasonable influence will find their reviews gain high traffic regardless of score. In fact, my most popular ever reviews (Skyrim and BioShock) were 10s.

Of course, ascribing an ulterior motive to a review is a nice way of avoiding the acceptance of an alternate opinion.

Review scores are the new console war. You should know this.
 
Fun fact: The whole "negative reviews for clickbait" shit is a total myth. Any site of reasonable influence will find their reviews gain high traffic regardless of score. In fact, my most popular ever reviews (Skyrim and BioShock) were 10s.

Of course, ascribing an ulterior motive to a review is a nice way of avoiding the acceptance of an alternate opinion.

Hear, hear!
 
I asked this in another thread but didn't get a reply, so I thought I'd ask here as well; does anyone know how open the environments are supposed to be? They've mentioned they are "semi" open, but linear, or something like that. Does anyone know specifically, maybe someone that played the demo? Is the game supposed to be large?

ND has labeled it as "wide linear". It has multiple paths to go to one point. This is still a narrative based game so it's not an open world game.
Also, it looks like the average time it's taking people to beat the game is around 17hrs.
 
Fun fact: The whole "negative reviews for clickbait" shit is a total myth. Any site of reasonable influence will find their reviews gain high traffic regardless of score. In fact, my most popular ever reviews (Skyrim and BioShock) were 10s.

Of course, ascribing an ulterior motive to a review is a nice way of avoiding the acceptance of an alternate opinion.

qqX04.gif
 
Maybe we just have different tastes...

This seems to be the case and there's nothing wrong with that.

I always find Naughty Dog as one of those developers who are the most talented in their industry, but they always stayed in the safe region by always being comical and not taking their storytelling too serious.

This seems to be taking a whole different approach and I absolutely welcome that change.

I'd say they have stayed in the safe region in the sense that their games are all very much products of their age, fitting neatly into whatever trends are defining the industry at any given moment. TLoU doesn't seem to be different either - it's a very serious, post-apocalyptic, story-driven, highly cinematic game.

I really don't want to sound like I'm dissing the game (I'm not, I just can't get over my own gameplay-centric snobbery), so I'll just stop.
 
I think Uncharted 2 is better but I still think Uncharted 3 is worthy of a 9.

Using the entire scale and accounting for my extreme pickiness, UC3 was like a 6. As in "mediocre, but the presentation bumps it up a bit."

I reeeeeeeeeally doubt that. This is the superior team!

We'll see. I initially thought the same thing, but I've managed to curb the hype. I've been burned too many times this gen.
 
Will be playing this game on Saturday already - woo-ooo!!

Cant wait!


Watching this thread and hoping for fanboy meltdowns.

Dont let me down SonyGAF!
 
Fun fact: The whole "negative reviews for clickbait" shit is a total myth. Any site of reasonable influence will find their reviews gain high traffic regardless of score. In fact, my most popular ever reviews (Skyrim and BioShock) were 10s.

Of course, ascribing an ulterior motive to a review is a nice way of avoiding the acceptance of an alternate opinion.

Are you real!?

Well even if I'm the only one in this thread I like Jim!

Anyway, I am sure like every other thing ever reviewed, this game will be divisive to an extent.

So if people get upset with scores that imply it's good i.e. a 7 or 8, you should probably just go with the publication that most closely matches your opinion and attribute the most weight to that score.

I don't always agree with them, but I will always trust a Giantbomb score.
 
Fun fact: The whole "negative reviews for clickbait" shit is a total myth. Any site of reasonable influence will find their reviews gain high traffic regardless of score. In fact, my most popular ever reviews (Skyrim and BioShock) were 10s.

Of course, ascribing an ulterior motive to a review is a nice way of avoiding the acceptance of an alternate opinion.
Yay for Jim! He is our guiding light...
I guess you can say what you thought of the demo part of the game, if you can do you care to share your thoughts? I'm fairly certain this is a genre you like(?) and if it really is survival horror I wouldn't be surprised to see a very positive review from you.
 
I have read EDGE since 1996 and I have yet to encounter them failing at this singular task that is video game reviewing.

Most sites have managed to be completely compromised, the average GameSpot and IGN reviewer has sold out at least three times over this period - going on toward other, new sites and so forth.

EDGE is my yardstick.
 
Pre-patch, I think it's a four-ish.

That disgusting input lag! How the game even got released in that state is an absolute disgrace. The fact no large reviews sites called them out or even mentioned it just proves to me they are on the payroll, scared losing review access to games etc etc The drop in quality between U2 to U3 is just sad.

Any reviews for TLUS will be taken with a grain of salt because of this, more interested in seeing what the average person who plays it after release has to say.
Reviews cant be trusted to be more than publisher mouth pieces and these threads become nothing more than circle jerking over reviews scores of 9-10's or melt downs because it got 7-8's.
 
Fun fact: The whole "negative reviews for clickbait" shit is a total myth. Any site of reasonable influence will find their reviews gain high traffic regardless of score. In fact, my most popular ever reviews (Skyrim and BioShock) were 10s.

Of course, ascribing an ulterior motive to a review is a nice way of avoiding the acceptance of an alternate opinion.
Huh, didnt know actually game journalist posted here as well. Cool

Never understood the whole "clickbait" myth or the paid off reviewer sentiment that pervades forums. Every game has flaws and perfection is an objective ideal. What may be minor to someone may be a large con for another. That's why a range of review scores exist. But I've always found that matters is the content of a review, not the score. Some people get enraged if a game gets a 7 or 8, but if the reviewer gave a thoughtful detailed explanation of what they considered bad or unpolished, who cares about the score?
 
Huh, didnt know actually game journalist posted here as well. Cool

Never understood the whole "clickbait" myth or the paid off reviewer sentiment that pervades forums. Every game has flaws and perfection is an objective ideal. What may be minor to someone may be a large con for another. That's why a range of review scores exist. But I've always found that matters is the content of a review, not the score. Some people get enraged if a game gets a 7 or 8, but if the reviewer gave a thoughtful detailed explanation of what they considered bad or unpolished, who cares about the score?
GAF is frequented by developers and publishers too.

We've managed to make Denis Dyack cry you know.
 
That disgusting input lag! How the game even got released in the state is an absolute disgrace. The fact no large reviews sites called them out or even mentioned it just proves to me they are on the payroll. The drop in quality between U2 to U3 is just sad.

I played through the entire game before the patch and was never bothered even one time by the controls. And I still say that the U3's highs are higher than any in the series while its lows are probably the lowest. I'd still put it at least even with U2 just because of the highs like chapters 12-15.
 
I played through the entire game before the patch and was never bothered in one time by the controls. And I still say that the U3's highs are higher than any in the series while its lows are probably the lowest. I'd still put it at least even with U2 just because of the highs like chapters 12-15.
I did the same thing (complete the game on hard difficulty prior to the patch).

As a gamer, I adapted to the game, because the game was awesome with its characters and story. Input was just a way to make it come alive. And it did.

This pre-patch/post-patch stuff is all balls.
 
Pre-patch, I think it's a four-ish.

At its worst, I'd say it dips into "4" territory, I just don't think it sustains that level of "badness", or more accurately, "below average" consistently enough to receive a 4.

I'm hopeful that I'll enjoy TLoU much more than that, but I'm also not going in with blind hype because "IT'S THE SUPERIOR TEAM!"

You're both pretty far off.

7 = "good" in my mind, so unless you mean you'd go much lower than my 6, no, I don't think I'm far off in terms of how much I enjoyed it.
 
I played through the entire game before the patch and was never bothered in one time by the controls. And I still say that the U3's highs are higher than any in the series while its lows are probably the lowest. I'd still put it at least even with U2 just because of the highs like chapters 12-15.

Same. I got it on launch day and beat it the following days. I have no idea what the complaints regarding the controls are about.

The game didn't have the 'wow' factor that U2 did, but it's still definitely one of the best games for me from this generation.


(IMO, IMO, IMO, IMO, IMO)
 
Pre-patch, I think it's a four-ish.

I really, really, REALLY don't get the hate for UC3.

I played all 3 uncharted games when I bought my ps3..and I honestly found UC3 to be the best out of all of them.

With 3 I felt like I was on a globe trotting adventure, and the big set pieces really gave some legit OH SHIT moments.

With UC2, yeah the village piece was really nice, and I really loved the whole train piece as well, and the last finale piece was great as well...But Idk..it all felt to constrained to the whole Himalaya/Nepal (i think that was the area?) region.

With UC3 we traveled to many more unique locations, that felt legitimately varied...and I felt the narrative was a bit weaker overall, but still solid.

Where does the hate come from? I honestly, and legitimately am baffled by how so many of you just despise UC3 for whatever reason.
 
Where does the hate come from? I honestly, and legitimately am baffled by how so many of you just despise UC3 for whatever reason.
It's basically a GAF inside joke. Just chuckle and move on.

on topic: a 10/10 from EDGE for TLOU is just amazing. the game must be fantastic.
 
I can see the 9.3 rage happening on GT again, I'm calling it..

There was no "rage" over them giving Uncharted 2 a 9.3. It was just gamers in general laughing at them for saying that they like to reward innovation and that's the highest that they can go for a game that isn't bringing anything new to the table...an then they gave Modern Warfare 2 a 9.5.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom