Poodlestrike
Banned
Because you don't go from first discovering the mass effect and having 0 ft ships or knowledge to standing toe to toe with the galaxies most significant military power in 9 years. Yes, technology is guided along a similar route, but not that fast! Similarly, I don't think technology stagnation means going from 0 to max level in 9 years - do we think that there has literally been zero advancement by council species in the last 2200 years? (And then suddenly all the non-reaper tech advancement we see within the series from Me1 to ME3?).
I love the setting, but nothing about the timelines works. I just mentally add a couple of centuries to everything... ;-)
I mean, we didn't go from 0. It's not like Earth circa 2176 doesn't have a pretty impressive technological and industrial base of its own, lol. So we got gud, or at least, gud enough that the Turians had to try. We still weren't really on par, but able to put up a respectable fight.
And not no advancement, but yeah, basically marginal? They thought they were scraping the frontier of what's possible. We tend to think that the current incredibly rapid progress we're currently going through is the norm, but historically, that's not the case, and it's not likely to remain the case going forward. You're already seeing thinkpieces about how it's very possible that we've gotten all the "low hanging fruit," scientifically speaking.
I mean, I'm not totally opposed to adding more time to humanity's timeline, but something's gotta give, otherwise they'd be utterly outclassed by the Council races, which is demonstrably not the case
Putting aside the lore nonsense in Halo, it took like 500 years for Humanity in that series to get to where they were, and they still almost got BTFO by the Covenant.
You actually see people bitching about timeline stuff in Halo as well, the reasoning being that in 500 years they think that we'd probably be doing better on the weapons front than they are in the games.