I am sure we do, but I may have missed it, we have NEX-7 users here? any impressions? lenses available and pricing? is the sensor similar to the one in the Canon 50D in terms of size or 7D?
Still no word on pricing and availability of the 200-400L?
With so many spottings in the wild at Olympia I thought we´d had those now. :-/
Probably at least $12k.
I love Sony as a company (you might even call me a fanboy) so it's really encouraging to see so many of you supporting the NEX series. Hopefully the camera/imaging division can turn this recent success into major profitability.
Also, it looks like the D600 will probably be $2200-2500 for just the body.
Also also, check out the slick door on the RX1...
Loll. FoolsRumored Japanese D600 list price: ¥21500 ($2600) LOL
I love Sony as a company (you might even call me a fanboy) so it's really encouraging to see so many of you supporting the NEX series. Hopefully the camera/imaging division can turn this recent success into major profitability.
Also, it looks like the D600 will probably be $2200-2500 for just the body.
Also also, check out the slick door on the RX1...
Is Sigma 19mm for Nex good? I consider it as a replacement for 16 mm Sony pancake - it's that awful and I still need a wide-angle lens with autofocus.
I'm a point and click kind of guy even though I have a DSLR (a cheapy Sony one in fact!).
Can someone explain what type of shooter the RX1 is for? I think I understand the portability (always great) but if it's matching the 99's price pretty much are there folk out there who want the sensor and portability and will pay for it? And if so, who are these folk? Pro and semi-pro photographers?
As I said photography is a bit of a mystery to me...
EDIT: Man, I even remember asking about buying a Nex as a gift for a good friend of mine in this very thread. I should read it more often...
It's light, it's very sharp, the color's great, and its manual focus feels nice. But it's plastic-fantastic and its autofocus motor is VERY slow to start up when you turn on the camera or when you switch to shoot mode out of review mode. Like, expect it to add an extra two seconds in each of those cases.
Rich dudes browsing the fred miranda forums. They should have made it more like the Contax G2 less like the watered down mirrorless cameras we're getting now. Nobody has figured it out yet.Can someone explain what type of shooter the RX1 is for? I think I understand the portability (always great) but if it's matching the 99's price pretty much are there folk out there who want the sensor and portability and will pay for it? And if so, who are these folk? Pro and semi-pro photographers?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/0...with-39-point-af-and-uncompressed-1080p-video
$2,099
No AF mode/metering mode switches on the back? I guess that's like the D700. I miss my D200, if only for the build and controls.
Nice, I wonder how Canon will respond?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/0...with-39-point-af-and-uncompressed-1080p-video
$2,099
No AF mode/metering mode switches on the back? I guess that's like the D700. I miss my D200, if only for the build and controls.
- -
NEX6 ISO test, they also have test for the 3 lenses. No RX1 though.
http://www.ephotozine.com/article/sony-nex-6-sample-photo-gallery-20120
I hope someone do a NEX6 vs NEX7 test.
WHERE IS THE TRI NAV? :/
On the NEX7.
This only have DUAL-NAVI.
But you get a PASM dial.
Pretty lame not including tri-nav. :/
I already have a 7 so I'm not that upset but it is a missed opportunity.
PASM-dial is nice. On my 7 I have it set up so a right click on the back controller displays the wheel and I can quickly select which mode I want to be in. Mostly A for photography and S for video.
If they included tri-nav it would be absolutely pointless to spend the $350 additional on the 7 since the 6 seems to be superior in just about every other way. Bi-nav it is!!
I just wish the 6 had a touchscreen. I never remember to use the touchscreen to focus on my 5N, but it would probably would have helped me nail focus on a ton of thin DOF shots where I would focus lock and then recompose.
Ok camera-gaf, I'm going on a trip to California next week and I want to upgrade my cheap cam to something decent. I'm looking for the best combination of picture quality and compact size, and I'm considering the Fuji X10 or Sony NEX5. Right now I'd give the X10 the edge because of its size and price. Would it be a good choice for a travel cam? Consider I'm a beginner and just want to take good pics with minimal effort. I also really like the look of it, I had to resist impulse buying it when I saw it in the store just now
Another plus for the NEX7 expect its sensor.
+iISO!
Ok camera-gaf, I'm going on a trip to California next week and I want to upgrade my cheap cam to something decent. I'm looking for the best combination of picture quality and compact size, and I'm considering the Fuji X10 or Sony NEX5. Right now I'd give the X10 the edge because of its size and price. Would it be a good choice for a travel cam? Consider I'm a beginner and just want to take good pics with minimal effort. I also really like the look of it, I had to resist impulse buying it when I saw it in the store just now
Doesnt sound like you want or are interested in interchangeable lenses right?
Do you think you will in the future?
At this time : no, I'm not. However, I go on press trips from time to time and after each one I feel a bigger desire to take better pictures. So I won't rule out that at some point I'd want to get into it for real. For future-proofing, I guess I'd be better of with the Sony...
are there any pitfalls for using nikon AI lenses on canon EOS EF cameras?
I would get the X10. N5 is more capable but demands more user input and control. Plus the zoom is bigger.
If you want to learn however, get the N5.
Dont think too much about the far future though, by that time the Landscape will be very different and everything will be cheaper.
What do you actually need in the next year, you think you would rather have a small body and automatic functions? then get the X10.