Congrats!teiresias said:Well, it came in today!!
Unfortunately I won't really have any time to mess with it for two weeks since I'm going out of town on Sunday and I won't be taking it with me (no bag yet - leaning toward a Domke F-6 - on top of still learning it). I need to find a good grip position for my left hand though, I'm currently at a loss for how to hold it on that side.
mrkgoo said:Congrats!
Are you a left-hander?
Try having your left hand be palm side up.teiresias said:I need to find a good grip position for my left hand though, I'm currently at a loss for how to hold it on that side.
Rentahamster said:Try having your left hand be palm side up.
Place the bottom of the camera on base of your palm, cushioned by the meaty parts of your hand.
Your thumb and forefinger will naturally curve up in a U-shape. Use that to adjust zoom and focus.
mrkgoo said:Also on this topic, how do you guys shoot portrait orientation? Right hand over head, or under? I used to shoot over, and never thought about it, until I saw an image somewhere that said the better technique is to shoo under, providing more support and less awkwardness. I switched, found this to be true and seldom shoot my old way.
BlueTsunami said:I shoot with my right hand on top (with the shutter button), left hand supporting the opposite side (or bottom when in Portrait orientation). Its still very awkward, especially with something as small as a Rebel.
A battery grip looks very appealing to me because of this.
teiresias said:Lord, the LCD on the back of this thing is gorgeous. Such a change from my Canon G9 LCD - though I still think that's a wonderful camera for a P&S, albeit a somewhat large one.
Congrats on the purchase! I want one but if I did get it I would do body only, the kit lense doesn't seem that good.teiresias said:Well, it came in today!!
Unfortunately I won't really have any time to mess with it for two weeks since I'm going out of town on Sunday and I won't be taking it with me (no bag yet - leaning toward a Domke F-6 - on top of still learning it). I need to find a good grip position for my left hand though, I'm currently at a loss for how to hold it on that side.
I'm curious as to what exactly you were expecting in the way of lenses? It's a brand new camera with a new mount that launched with two lenses. However, you can use all 4/3rds lenses with it.Instigator said:I like the potential of it, but I didn't like my experience with the E-P1. Nice gadget, but I find it too big still. Very limited selection of lenses too (unless you want to use bulkier 4/3 lenses).
I'd rather stick with a small-ish DSLR with more lenses. Or something more compact like the LX3.
captive said:I'm curious as to what exactly you were expecting in the way of lenses? It's a brand new camera with a new mount that launched with two lenses. However, you can use all 4/3rds lenses with it.
And I dont think i've ever heard any of the non SHG Pro Oly lenses called "bulky" they are generally smaller in every respect to their canon and nikon counterparts. The 50-200 f2.8 is a full pound lighter than the canon equiv. Which I can handhold with my e30 all the way down to 1/100 shutter pretty consistently.
I think your going to be hard pressed to find a smaller DSLR than the 620 with IS built in.
620 + pancake is pocket-able.
B&H just put the D90 kit on sale for $994 - nearly $100 less than what I paid :lol oh well. That basically makes the kit lens only $100 given the body only price, but if you already have lenses you like the body only might still be worth it though I suspect you could probably sell the 18-105 kit lens for more than $100.Zyzyxxz said:Congrats on the purchase! I want one but if I did get it I would do body only, the kit lense doesn't seem that good.
yes, I believe so.mrkgoo said:What screen does the D90 have? the new 920,000 dots one?
I know your not. I was just curious what your reasoning was behind expecting more lenses.Instigator said:First of all, I am not of those four-thirds haters. Quite the opposite.
I would attach them to an Ep1 or GF1 not only for the ridiculous factor, but because they are still great in the IQ department.Moreover, I am not a prime lens guy, yet it seems that, for the GF1 and E-P1 to make sense, these cameras need compact primes. It looks like exactly what excites people about those cameras.
On the other hand, I like fast zooms and I am willing to put up with a bit of bulk. The mid-range lens selection with Olympus is very appealing to me (12-60 and 50-200 in particular). but I wouldn't attach them to an E-P1. I'd prefer the balance and the full functionality of an E-620 or E-30 body for those lenses.
No, its not.And no thanks on the 25mm pancake. Far from Olympus' finest lens!
Borman said:I just want to send a big thanks to Futureman for the lens! Its an amazing little lens, especially for the price.
Used the new lens to take a picture of my old one, amazing what the f1.8 will do
borman said:Any recommendations for a cheap-ish zoom lens for my Canon T1i? Cheap as in 200-300$.
mrkgoo said:That the one for $20? A steal! A must-have lens for any beginner. Futureman is a saint for for passing it on at such a good price.
teiresias said:So I've been reading some on different forums, and I've seen quite a bit of a discussion on how to store lenses and bodies. Basically, people debating keeping them in dedicated (and expensive as I know since I've procured some for work to store IC chips in) dry boxes or just sticking them in a drawer with a bunch of dessicant bags or small electric dehumidifiers. Does anyone here go through all of these measures when storing lenses and bodies? It seems like it all would be a tad bit excessive for a non-pro photographer.
teiresias said:B&H just put the D90 kit on sale for $994 - nearly $100 less than what I paid :lol oh well. That basically makes the kit lens only $100 given the body only price, but if you already have lenses you like the body only might still be worth it though I suspect you could probably sell the 18-105 kit lens for more than $100.
I've read good things about the kit lens though so it seems decent, but I'm honestly more interested in getting the 35mm f/1.8 prime and playing with that.
http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&fcategoryid=139&modelid=19584equap said:
Still keen for that 5DmkII, or thinking it won't drop in price? I know the 1D cameras aren't really in the same league, but a 1-year old camera in the face of two new cameras? How long did the 5DmkI hold its price? I guess you also have to keep in mind all the other full-frame competition out there now.Futureman said:
teiresias said:So I've been reading some on different forums, and I've seen quite a bit of a discussion on how to store lenses and bodies. Basically, people debating keeping them in dedicated (and expensive as I know since I've procured some for work to store IC chips in) dry boxes or just sticking them in a drawer with a bunch of dessicant bags or small electric dehumidifiers. Does anyone here go through all of these measures when storing lenses and bodies? It seems like it all would be a tad bit excessive for a non-pro photographer.
I can't really see it dropping, even with the 7D and new 1D4. It's still selling well and has a good price niche carved out for itself. I could see Canon sticking with the current price until they get the 5D3 out.mrkgoo said:Still keen for that 5DmkII, or thinking it won't drop in price? I know the 1D cameras aren't really in the same league, but a 1-year old camera in the face of two new cameras? How long did the 5DmkI hold its price? I guess you also have to keep in mind all the other full-frame competition out there now.
mrkgoo said:Still keen for that 5DmkII, or thinking it won't drop in price? I know the 1D cameras aren't really in the same league, but a 1-year old camera in the face of two new cameras? How long did the 5DmkI hold its price? I guess you also have to keep in mind all the other full-frame competition out there now.
Not a single external light source was used / added. In other words I did not use a single flashlight, LightPanel, flood light - nothing. For one shot only I pulled out a silver reflector just to say we did it really. And yes it worked (see the shot of the young girl.)
XMonkey said:I can't really see it dropping, even with the 7D and new 1D4. It's still selling well and has a good price niche carved out for itself. I could see Canon sticking with the current price until they get the 5D3 out.
Futureman said:I'm definitely not getting a 1D IV, just thought it was exciting news to post.
I'm probably going to wait until January to get the 5DII. I'm in a studio lighting class right now and I'd rather not have any amount of time without a camera, as I'd have to sell my 5D and then purchase the 5DII. This will allow me to save a little more until January. I highly doubt there'll be a price drop anytime soon. Canon just announced they are releasing a 2nd firmware update for this thing in the first half of 2010 to add 24p/25p framerate options. With Canon adding value like this I don't see the price changing much... maybe down a few hundred sometime in 2010 but nothing worth waiting for.
I just signed up for Best Buy Reward Zone, hopefully I get a 10% off coupon soon which would net me ~$250 off (which would go straight to an 8 GB UDMA CF card and a 1 TB external HD for working with the huge video files from the 5DII).
Studio lighting class? Cool. What kind of lights are you guys using? Do you have any kind of textbook or anything? "Light Science and Magic", or something?Futureman said:I'm definitely not getting a 1D IV, just thought it was exciting news to post.
I'm probably going to wait until January to get the 5DII. I'm in a studio lighting class right now and I'd rather not have any amount of time without a camera, as I'd have to sell my 5D and then purchase the 5DII. This will allow me to save a little more until January. I highly doubt there'll be a price drop anytime soon. Canon just announced they are releasing a 2nd firmware update for this thing in the first half of 2010 to add 24p/25p framerate options. With Canon adding value like this I don't see the price changing much... maybe down a few hundred sometime in 2010 but nothing worth waiting for..
N2_ said:finally got one
mrkgoo said:Hmm. Possibly. True, the 1D and 7D are different beasts entirely, but the competition is much more stiff now. In the past year and a bit, Canon added two new lines to their DSLR range, filling gaps everywhere. The 5DmkII has already seen a drop of $100 in the past week I think (or atleast I heard it's now $2,599).
Anyway, as the megapixel wars draw to a close, a new battle (once in the background) comes into the spotlight - the ISO wars! We're seeing higher and higher iso capabilities as the processors improve. It has been a somewhat of a marketing potion for point and shoots (iso1600!), but they were always crap after iso400. It ink now, there might be a push to improve that and use it as a marketing point.
The samples on Canon's site look pretty good so far.mrklaw said:I wonder how that 1D fares with high ISO? Smaller sensor than the 5D, but larger than the 7D, and lower megapixels than both. It is crazy that we're looking at 12800 standard ISO which is crazy compared to film days
N2_ said:finally got one
Rentahamster said:Studio lighting class? Cool. What kind of lights are you guys using? Do you have any kind of textbook or anything? "Light Science and Magic", or something?
I never took a studio lighting class so I'm kinda curious as to how people formally learn this stuff.
Wow, $400, that's not too bad. What I meant was that I've learned about studio lighting, just not in a classroom setting. I'd always wondered if I should look at my local community college or something to see if I should take a class and whether that would help. I just gotta find the time.Futureman said:We have a Calumet pack and heads (here's the pack: http://www.4thtimearound.com/photos/caly.jpg), a White Lightning kit (two monoblocks), and another set-up that I haven't used (pack and head like the Calumet). Honestly though I'm trying to use my stuff as much as possible (Alien Bee unit and a Nikon speedlight) as it's what I have and what I'll be using after the class.
The piece of equipment that I REALLY like is the $5,000 printer my school has. Provide your own paper and you can make 17x22 prints for ~$2.50 (just gotta pay for the ink).
I'm in Studio Lighting 2 right now and we have no text book. 1 didn't have anything required either, but our professor suggested a few books. I just recently read McNally's "Hot Shoe Diaries" which is great, and "Light Science and Magic" is on my to-read list.
My school is a small, local film/photo school and the tuition for the class is only $400. I'd definitely look into a class or workshop if you are interested in learning about studio lighting.