dream said:Underworlds (http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=312421230&mt=8) is out if anyone wants to try a Diablo clone. I'd take one for the team but I'm still reeling from Tornado Mania going on sale THREE HOURS AFTER IT CAME OUT.
Toy Soldier said:Sweet, just bought it. The screens of this one had me pretty excited, hopefully it's fun.
Toy Soldier said:First off, the visuals are phenomenal. Great detailed environments - especially indoors, tiny little animated sequences between areas, pretty great looking pause/inventory/status screen too - very easy to navigate.
The default d-pad is pretty much useless, it's so small that it's practically impossible to use consistenly (which is a disappointment). Go ahead and turn that off so you can enjoy the visuals unobstructed.
So you're moving around Diablo style, point-and-move. This only presents a problem when you're moving north or south, as the game's landscape presentation means you can only move in small steps in either direction. It's obviously not a big deal moving east or west, but it's an issue that a better d-pad control would have helped prevent. EDIT: Quick fix for this - just doing some finger tapping instead of one single point pretty much eliminates this issue...so tap north or south repeatedly and you move smoothly there.
Anyway, it's really good so far - I've done the first few little intro quests. It's exactly what we were all expecting, gameplay wise. No real flaws that I've seen.
Shadow780 said:Is there anyway to reinstall a purchased game after deletion?
My Zombieville stopped working after 1.2 update and I deleted it, wanting to install it again from the store, looks like a bad idea now...:lol
bdizzle said:Just resynch or redownload and resynch. or dl from your phone. it doesnt charge you again.
Shadow780 said:Actually it does when I revisit the app page (the price tag showed up), which is why I'm asking...
Shadow780 said:Yeah I tried restarting too, maybe I should try restart my iTunes as well?
Vyer said:Man WTF. After the update Zombieville is much harder, even on normal. And even though I like the game its balance is all sorts of fucked up. There will be times when I've gone full levels without a single ammo drop. So frustrating.
The screen is tough, you don't need a protector (and you're using your finger, not a stylus)Wallach said:On the topic of gaming, is a screen protector recommended? I noticed that this thing uses optical glass to cover the screen, but I'm still kind of nervous about it.
It's meh. The controls aren't very good, and there's been no update in ages.PhlivoSong said:Chronicles of Inotia has a trial version available now...
http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=311757533&mt=8
Looks like an interesting game
Flib said:Underworlds is fantastic, it really is the Diablo clone we've been waiting for. Biggest problems are the lack of music and character classes, but the developers have stated that they will be adding both of those in a future update.
But yeah, runs smooth, great graphics and has lootz
LaneDS said:Does Underworlds currently have the option where you can play your own music in the background?
Flib said:Yeah, you can play mp3's in the background. When I get home I'm going to load the D2 soundtrack on there.
Yeah I tried restarting too, maybe I should try restart my iTunes as well?
I know, I know where the hell have I been. Im not going to dance around it, with slippery salesman speak. Thats the first thing I have to address before I even think about writing another post. Well, busy, for one. Weve been working on a to put it lightly huge app and Ive been working every hour of the day on it. At least for me, working for yourself means feeling guilty every minute your not doing your job. Without a boss to yell at me for being lazy, I do nothing but yell at myself now. But, more on that in a moment.
Its been a while since weve taken a look at the bread and butter of this blog: Sales Charts. How about some of those puppies?
Theres Roulette. At this point, this chart is interesting just because of how long shes been on sale, and how little shes moved. Roulette has been lucky, and spared the lingering death that so many older apps have faced. She certainly never shined bright, but, still does OK.
![]()
And then theres Up There:
![]()
Really puts a feature in perspective, doesnt it? Things have slowed down, to put it lightly. Up There still sells OK on a day to day basis, enough to live on while we make the next game, but I think its safe to say at this point, that the feature did not have a lasting effect. It might have helped in the short run, but in the grand scheme, Up There just wasnt a big seller kind of app, and even a feature couldnt change that. Weve made some serious bank of this little devil, no doubt about it, so I dont want to knock that feature too hard. But, dont count on a feature to turn your app into something it isnt. Up There was a niche app, for people who want a nice little relaxing casual game, with pretty music and a balloon for a protagonist. Not the kind of thing to rock the app store world. A feature couldnt change that, and Up There has since pretty solidly moved to where it would have been, if the feature had never happened.
That brings me to a big part of why Ive been absent. As we were sitting, and thinking about what to do next, when Up There was finished, we decided we were lucky. And we were right. We got an app in at the last moment an app that size could reasonably be expected to make a splash. Up There did as well as it did, in part because it was still earlier in the app store. Its our humble opinion that the days of the tiny apps are done. Thats not to say that there wont be successful tiny apps. There will always be a market for distraction type games and apps. But when Up There came out, we felt confident that the quality of the app would make it rise above. And it did. But now god there are so many apps a day, I loose track in a minute of browsing the store. My point is, that you might get lucky and make a small app that makes a big splash, but thats playing the odds. If you want a better chance of making back your time you spend developing, I think youre in a better spot if you make something really remarkable an app that feels like a real game, not a distraction.
Koi Pond, Labyrinth, iBeer, all of that stuff would be in a lot worse shape if they came out today, than a year ago. Sure, theres still stuff like Pocket God, tiny things that get lucky But Rolando, iDracula you knew they were going to do well, it wasnt a gamble. Im going the safe route.
So thats what Ive been working on We started work on this game in November. Its April now. We hope to be testing it by June or July. This is a big game, friends. This is a huge game. Theres scripts, theres tons and tons of 3d models lord, theres mountains and mountains of code. Were trying to make an event. And man, is it exhausting.
Hopefully Im not wrong. Id hate to see that we were better off making more small type apps, then to invest a year or so into a full fledged, expansive game. But, no matter what, its always been a dream of mine to make something of this scope. To create a fleshed out story, and foster an atmosphere, and real attachment to the gameplay and characters. Its exciting times for me and exhausting and busy. So, Ill be here when I can but forgive me if Im too busy being excited about what were making to spend too much time here. Ill be back occasionally, and all the time when I can finally take a break from the development work. Until then, you should be excited about what we have coming up!
I ran into an interesting blog post over at indie iPhone dev Veiled Games' site discussing the commercial fate of the firm's classy microgame Up There. We liked Up There a good deal, and it seems like the Powers That Be did too, because Apple gave it a featured spot on the US App Store in late January. The app enjoyed its brief period in the sun--taking in excellent revenues at $1.99, and then shifting into overdrive at a sale price of 99 cents. Then it fell back down to Earth, as all balloons are likely to do sooner or later.
It can't last forever.
Evan of Veiled Games writes that even the tender ministrations of the App Store programmers weren't enough to push Up There onto the Top Paid Apps list for long. "Dont count on a feature to turn your app into something it isnt," quoth Evan. "Up There was a niche app, for people who want a nice little relaxing casual game, with pretty music and a balloon for a protagonist. Not the kind of thing to rock the App Store world. A feature couldnt change that, and Up There has since pretty solidly moved to where it would have been if the feature had never happened."
After this experience, Veiled reached the conclusion that small games like Up There simply get lost in the daily fire hose of new apps. "Its our humble opinion that the days of the tiny apps are done... youre in a better spot if you make something really remarkable an app that feels like a real game, not a distraction." Accordingly, Veiled is putting a lot more development juice into its next project, which sounds like it will have a much greater scope than Up There.
It seems like a logical response, but is it correct? Have commercial conditions on the App Store evolved to a point where it makes sense for a developer to move away from microgames, in favor of more ambitious concepts? It's certainly a worthy goal. I'm sure that we would all like to see iPhone games that have the complexity, depth, and production values to rival games on the portable consoles. I've advocated for it repeatedly since I started STP.
All of that said, if I were running a publisher instead of a website right now, I'd still be concentrating my resources on 99 cent-$1.99 microgames. As much as I hate to admit it, that's firmly where the center of the market is at the moment, and it's likely to remain there for some time, barring significant structural moves from Apple. For now, the main use case for the majority of people who buy iPhone and iTouch games is the one-to-five minute "gameplay snack." Most of these customers aren't "iPhone gamers"--they're idling away time. They want novelties and amusements, not gameplay, and they're drawn to provocative concepts and gimmicks.
I don't mean this in a pejorative sense; I am simply describing reality. In fact, I mostly prefer microgames myself these days. Working stiffs like me don't have the patience or energy to learn something that's designed to stress, rather than relax. Lots of others seem to agree, by the looks of the top paid games list. Flight Control, Flick Fishing, Doodle Jump: these are all high-quality microgames that have resonated with consumers. They cost essentially nothing, and they're highly replayable. Those many, many App Store customers that are reluctant to pay for anything can be coaxed into spending a buck.
And then, of course, there's the all-important profits side of the equation. Microgames are a low-risk, low-reward play. They cost only a fraction of a full game's development budget. Is any individual microgame likely to hit it big? Definitely not--you're playing the lottery, like Evan notes in his blog post. But if you put enough of these small games out and keep them on the App Store, updating them fairly regularly, a long tail effect should start to come into play. With enough games, that can add up to substantial revenue on the margins. Think about it like choosing a boring passive ability when upgrading your character in an RPG (classic example: percentage bonus to experience) instead of a flashy mega attack. A small but steady push is going to do a lot more good over the lifetime of the character.
Like it or hate it, you know the name.
Now examine the next tier of titles on the top paid games list: Bejeweled 2, Fast & Furious The Game, 2XL Supercross, Tetris, Galaga. The publishers of these games are living the dream--they get to charge more than 99 cents for their games, while still chilling out in the Top 20, where real volume gets done. Brands and marketing make the difference for most of these larger games. The publishers are still dealing with the volume problem, but the fact remains that they're playing on a different field than the no-name apps, no matter how good those might be. A familiar name is a boon. Plus, there is some evidence that a Veblen Effect is starting to kick in, at least for self-identified "console" games like Supercross. For certain buyers, higher prices combined with the right name will signal a different quality of experience.
I'm finding it difficult to wrap this article up, because as I read over what I just wrote, I realize that I'm recapitulating the same basic logic that has been ghettoizing the App Store. But that is how the business has evolved. Apple sets the terms, customers buy, and the results are self-evident. We want better, more expensive games, but not enough people are willing to pay for them to make them profitable. It sucks.
I see two basic ways forward. First, Apple delivers structural changes from on high--things that reset how people spend on iPhone games, like a Premium Games section and micropayments. Second, a middle ground bridging micro- and macrogames emerges from below--developers slowly improve the overall quality level of iPhone games while consumers come to accept paying more, little by little. I think we're going to need to see both at work for the business to continue to grow like it has. That iPhone OS 3.0 release can't come fast enough.
Gemini Z said:The only other idea is maybe your itunes account is not synced to your iphone. That's why it's not showing up as you already bought it. I'm just guessing though.
womp said:Was gonna grab Underworlds until I read it can be finished in 3 hours.
:/
Snagged Bookworm instead since I've been a longtime fan and it's excellent.
The "Complete Version" is now available!
・8 "MISSION" Stages added
・20 "Wallpapers" added
・Language Support (French, German, Italian, and Spanish)
*"MISSION" completion records, "CODE NAME" acquisition records, earned DP, and "Wallpaper" exchange records from the Initial Release will be maintained.
How do I get this? I searched for updates in iTunes but nothing showed up. Anyone know what to do? :/Remy said:Metal Gear Solid Touch 2.0 just came out, per Appshopper.
Give it an hour maybe, sometimes each region has delays to another.snap0212 said:How do I get this? I searched for updates in iTunes but nothing showed up. Anyone know what to do? :/
You will cough up blood.Mdk7 said:Is it hard guys?
I'm a n00b!
Well, it's already out over here. Some people (who bought the game already) have already posted impressions.Diablohead said:Give it an hour maybe, sometimes each region has delays to another.
Stoney Mason said:Manage Your Football Club has been approved and should be up in the next store in the near future for soccer management fans.
Video
That's GeoDefense... sooo amazing, i'm loving it too!Proc said:I killed a bunch of time on my friend's iphone playing that geometry wars-esque tower defence game. That game kicked my ass but I loved it. I couldn't get over how clear the font and graphics were on that device (new to iPhones, I know).
truth-lasers said:Yeah, it's out now, $9,99.
http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=312516264&mt=8
I'm interested in the game, but at that price I'll wait for impressions before buying.
billy.sea said:The Karmastar game they showed on the last CO-OP also on sale $1.99, is that a good game?
I think this is just based on Winter Bells from Orisinal.comBliddo said:Can I spam a little?
My first iPhone game is almost ready, it needs just some tweaking and the background music.
Here's a video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0ULX5l_GA0
Sorry for the crappy crappy crappy quality
I've done all the coding from scratch and the hand drawn(well, tablet drawn) graphics, now a friend is helping with the coding and another friend offered his help for the music.
It was a lot of work for such a small project, but I'm kinda happy with the result.
Mdk7 said:I had never tried any Tower Defence game before (i don't really like Strategy games, i suck at them!), but yesterday nite i downloaded GeoDefense Lite... WOW.
I'm speechless!
So fucking good, i think i'll buy it for sure (even if i can't beat the second normal level :lol ).
Is it hard guys?
I'm a n00b!
Zeliard said:Drop7 and Azkend are unbelievably awesome.