Is the real G because didn't liked the game? lol
All those that liked it are shills?
He didnt like the game and informed us about this, tons of sellout reviewers give high scores to those shitty games yet they know deep down those games are pure shit, thats why we call them sellouts after all

U think overall metascore from reviewers, being fucking 83 is how the reviewers actually thought that game deserves? Or 62 for concord? Or 82 for veilguard...
There is tons more examples too, its not about sony, microsoft or w/e, those reviewers are simply not genuine.
Destruction allstars got 62, so bit above avg, and we all know very well that game was super shit, well below avg
Metacritic aggregates music, game, tv, and movie reviews from the leading critics. Only Metacritic.com uses METASCORES, which let you know at a glance how each item was reviewed.
www.metacritic.com
4 out of fucking 59 reviewers gave it below 50 meta, so what it deserved, thats 7%, total sellouts (11 reviews, 20%) gave it scores of 75 and above, nuff said
There are hundreds of examples this gen alone of how bad/inacurate/ not genuine majority of professional reviewers are.
Edit:
Metacritic aggregates music, game, tv, and movie reviews from the leading critics. Only Metacritic.com uses METASCORES, which let you know at a glance how each item was reviewed.
www.metacritic.com
Last but not least example, veilguard got 75 or higher meta from 55 reviewers(thats 75% of all reviews), only 18 prof journos gave it mixed score(50-74) and 0 of reviewers gave it below 50 meta aka what it deserved.
And let me remind u, EA didnt even implemented denuvo into pc version coz upkeep is 25k usd/month and game was so bad no1 wanted to even pirate that shit and ofc EA knew it.