And why did you never mention Stan btw? He would have to be lying just as much as me?
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
The Price Is Right MAFIA edition |OT| Come on down!!!
- Thread starter Sophia
- Start date
StarSketch
Banned
MODKILL: Blargonaut
Ok, joking aside, i think we should stop playing 'find the Xbox' until we actually find out what the prizes even do.
Bearing in mind that this is day one and everything is based on the slightest of things, I'd say that my response is realistic. Consider the circumstances. In addition to the date, we are talking about Blarg and he has not yet explained himself yet either. In other words, while it is justifiable to be suspicious, I'd advice against going further until Blarg explains himself.
Your own response to everything Blarg said rings a bit in my ears. Tad too aggressive to my liking.
Careful, that last line was almost an opinion
That's also the second person to use the "Blarg being Blarg" excuse. Not a fan
Okay now that I'm actually home and not on my phone it's time to play the game.
The Mother Ships from the game Xevious.
A rocket ship with cool fins near the top
Royyor Spaceships.
I'm apparently on a space-kick right now. :x
Wroooong. Not only wrong because I believe Blarg is Scum and he has been trying to lead conversation all Day but even before that there have been plenty of times where Scum try to lead Day 1. It's not an unheard of strategy.
Also you're deflecting the questions thrown at you. Although, interestingly enough, you want to lynch Blarg and at the moment he is way scummier than you are. Depending on what he ends up flipping you might be in the clear for me.
Never change guys <3
UNVOTE: StanleyPalmtree
I'm doing pretty well actually. Got a good nights sleep and now I'm looking forward to Mafia and Overwatch for a nice Sunday evening. c:
We can wear our Price is Right ignorance proudly. I'm tempted to look up the opening but i figured nah, I'll stay committed. Maybe I'll go back to watching Whose Line instead?
By the way, what's your thoughts currently on Blarg now that the rug has been unceremoniously pulled out from under him? Same for Dusk, what do you think of him?
Thank you.
Maybe it's just the horrors of VI coming back but Blarg is acting a lot like he did when he played Scum in that game. Threw a bunch of things at the wall to see what stuck and once he got something good it was everything he talked about and pushed in discussion. Blarg is also asking us to make huge decisions not only on flavor but on knowledge that only he posses and we have no way of knowing if he is telling the truth.
Even before the clarification came forward having the poem be posted is what gave it away. You're pushing really hard for decisions that are based on you twisting flavor and having ''''''insider knowledge'''''' of everything.
VOTE: Blargonaut
Since the questionnaire was such a raging success in Danny Phantom, I have developed the next step in Mafia analysis...MAFIA RORSCHACH. This scientifically proven method will allow us to determine who the bad guys are.
What is the first thing that comes to your mind, if you look at this picture?
The Mother Ships from the game Xevious.
What is the first thing that comes to your mind, if you look at this picture?
A rocket ship with cool fins near the top
We're almost done. One last picture. What is the first thing that comes to your mind, if you look at this picture? Remember that there are no right or wrong answers.
Royyor Spaceships.
I'm apparently on a space-kick right now. :x
Wroooong. Not only wrong because I believe Blarg is Scum and he has been trying to lead conversation all Day but even before that there have been plenty of times where Scum try to lead Day 1. It's not an unheard of strategy.
Also you're deflecting the questions thrown at you. Although, interestingly enough, you want to lynch Blarg and at the moment he is way scummier than you are. Depending on what he ends up flipping you might be in the clear for me.
Never change guys <3
UNVOTE: StanleyPalmtree
I'm doing pretty well actually. Got a good nights sleep and now I'm looking forward to Mafia and Overwatch for a nice Sunday evening. c:
We can wear our Price is Right ignorance proudly. I'm tempted to look up the opening but i figured nah, I'll stay committed. Maybe I'll go back to watching Whose Line instead?
By the way, what's your thoughts currently on Blarg now that the rug has been unceremoniously pulled out from under him? Same for Dusk, what do you think of him?
Thank you.
Maybe it's just the horrors of VI coming back but Blarg is acting a lot like he did when he played Scum in that game. Threw a bunch of things at the wall to see what stuck and once he got something good it was everything he talked about and pushed in discussion. Blarg is also asking us to make huge decisions not only on flavor but on knowledge that only he posses and we have no way of knowing if he is telling the truth.
Even before the clarification came forward having the poem be posted is what gave it away. You're pushing really hard for decisions that are based on you twisting flavor and having ''''''insider knowledge'''''' of everything.
VOTE: Blargonaut
OceanicAir
Member
Well, either we are gonna go for an advanced degree in Understanding Blarg or we might as well policy lynch. Because if not, whining about him certainly will not get anything straight forward from him.
But I do wonder, if I understood his picture correctly, why nobody died on N0. Either mafia was forbidden (which would be interesting), a clutch block by town, or part 2 of one the lousy decisions I've seen mafia make and they decided to not kill someone in the night phase.
So everything begins with Dusk's 50/50 argument: Blarg is scum or won an immunity. Let's ignore the argument itself and look at the reactions. I'm thinking that scum would like to get some #townpoints by throwing shade at Dusk's strange theory: "oh that looks scummy oh wow", blend in with the others.
Karkador desires the specifics. How did Dusk arrive at this conclusion? He finds the 50/50 oddly specific, but offers no other opinion. Amount of shade thrown, minimal.
*Splinter does things somewhat differently. He declares Dusk's posts scummy rather quickly. Again, consider the circumstances. When Splinter makes it known that he considers Dusk's 50/50 scummy as hell, Dusk is being questioned by Karkador who wants Dusk to give the details behind the argument. Just like with Blarg later on, in my opinion, Splinter throws shade rather quickly indeed and he has plenty to toss.
Sawneeks is the 1st to post what I see as a bit of a drive-by. Nothing else is added to the discussion than the fact that she considers Dusk scummy as fuck. Shade successfully thrown.
The second to quickly pass the scene is OceanicAir. He is more reserved in terms of shade and even desires an explanation about Dusk's posts. Only small amounts of shade detected.
Lastly, we have StarSketch. She offers explanations for Dusk's post and only offers a hint of shade between the lines.
#pointcalculator awards #aggressivescumpoints for Splinter and Sawneeks yaaaaay.
I could understand the mafia not being allowed a night kill on the opening night phase. It would effectively be kicking someone out of the game before they even had a chance to play. Not only would that kill not provide anyone with any useful information (sure, a positive for mafia), but would be pretty unfair gameplay wise to the one killed.
I mean, I can't really defend myself against the drive-by claims because that's kinda what it was. I was out at a Convention all day yesterday and used my down time to check in and make a post or two and none of them were really substantial at all. :x
Now that I'm home I can properly explain my reasons ( with quotes and all! ) if you want me to. I'm still unsure on Dusk but I have my sights on Blarg atm, unlike earlier where it was the opposite.
Please do offer some details, if you are able to.
I got u fam
He meant *Blarg and not Kawl, something Dusk fixed in a following post but figured I would clarify again here so it's not so confusing.
At the time of Dusk making this post everyone was still trying to figure out who played and Blarg had come forward stating he had already won. This post in particular felt a lot like role fishing as well as contributing to the conversation by making a blanket 50/50 statement he could back out of later if he gained too much heat.
"Well, Blarg could be protected by the Xbox and that's why he is coming forward ooooor he is Scum. idk"
meaning later he could either say 'let's not lynch Blarg because he has immunity' OR 'he is obviously lying and we should lynch the liar'.
It felt like Scum trying to safely contribute while having an easy out for any following situations.
Everyone has a 50/50 chance to flip Scum. Neutrals muck up that percentage but let's play this on the assumption there are no Neutrals ( seeing as we have no evidence of one atm ). When it comes down to it you're either Scum or you're not, hence '50/50'.
His numbers aren't what bother me like some other people, it's his refusal to explain why he uses the '50/50' number as his pushing point against Blarg. See here:
Kark asks him for specifics on where he got his 50/50 number from on Blarg. Dusk never answered that question at that point and instead deflects it by asking for 'yes or no questions'. So far the only reason I can tell for Dusk thinking Blarg is scum is because of the possible chance that he is lying about the Xbox and is why he is so active. Now that I think about it, this actually contradicts his line of thinking that Scum wouldn't push an active lynch so early yet he believes Blarg could be Scum because of the fake Xbox. Both arguably require an active Scum gambit so why he would dismiss one and believe the other is beyond me.
My initial Scum feelings for Dusk kind of break down into a Scum playing it safe and attempting to contribute but, when backed into a corner and questioned, had no real answer for his own statement. I'm still unsure on Dusk but I would much rather lynch Blarg first as it seems a lot of alignments hinge on him and depending on his flip it will influence what I feel about Dusk.
We know a typical mafia game involves a minority of players being mafia. Even adding in neutrals, the balance here wouldn't be 10 mafia/etc. and 10 town. Its not a 50/50 shot to flip scum, especially not on Day 1. It's more like 25/75, 30/70.
I pressed the 50/50 because it did seem oddly specific. Either Dusk was mistaken enough to stick his neck out for a faulty claim, or he was operating on some kind of inside info. Maybe the game IS somehow 50/50. Or maybe Dusk is in a role that made him off-handedly think of the 50/50 number.
Now, what also makes me a bit curious is that you're trying to rationalize and cover for his gaffe by also insisting the chance to flip scum is 50/50. It's like trying to repeat 2+2=5 enough times until we believe it's true.
Well that's more like it, but is it opposite day? "Offers no opinion", "minimal shade" is fine, while trying to lynch obvious scum is scummy?
I don't even disagree that Kark (Plinko aside) has been looking pretty townie, but I don't really get your reasoning here.
OceanicAir
Member
Of course not.
We had a game where there was a full set of N0 actions, because the flip would give us more to talk about since D1 is usually awfully boring. Beyond a straight night kill there could be some sort of poisoner also to avoid getting kicked out before actually starting. Although with the reduced time for D1 that might not be necessary either.
On a related note, I think I've agreed with everything Kark has said this game (I'm assuming Plinko was silliness). I don't think that's ever happened before.
I'm scared and I don't know what to do.
...
Moving on
I'm not whining, I'm strongly advising we lynch him.
Because he's scum.
I'm scared and I don't know what to do.
...
Moving on
That's incredibly reductive. I understand Blarg well enough to know when he's furiously backpedaling from a stupid fucking question, or when he's throwing gambits for the sake of gambits.
I'm not whining, I'm strongly advising we lynch him.
Because he's scum.
You realize I'm being incredibly lazy and not doing actual numbers, right? Also if saying 'Dusk is scummy af' is me covering for his mistake I don't know what to tell you.
I can't speak for Dusk but I assumed he was only talking about Blarg's alignment. A person's alignment is one of two things: Town or Scum. I'm not saying overall the Roster is split down the middle with 10 Scum and 10 Town, I'm saying an individual's alignment is split down the middle being 50/50.
Ok Sawneeks I was being facetious with Stathamville.
I'm on board with everything else you've said, but this 50/50 thing is a weird, mathematically bogus, hill to die on.
I could get behind a Blarg or Dusk lynch today. For Blarg I don't think we got much information out of him claiming to have won the bid. It created discussion but I don't know if the confusion was worth it.
Dusk's reasoning has been weird but I'm split on them. Sometimes I read their earlier posts and see them as town figuring stuff out but the "50/50 odds" thing is what sticks out. I understand the reasoning behind why they would say it and that's all been discussed but I don't know what effect that statistic was meant to have. He got focused on Blarg really early and unless I missed it never really covered the idea of Blarg being town. He just immediately jumped to either him getting immunity or being scum.
Dusk's reasoning has been weird but I'm split on them. Sometimes I read their earlier posts and see them as town figuring stuff out but the "50/50 odds" thing is what sticks out. I understand the reasoning behind why they would say it and that's all been discussed but I don't know what effect that statistic was meant to have. He got focused on Blarg really early and unless I missed it never really covered the idea of Blarg being town. He just immediately jumped to either him getting immunity or being scum.
CornBurrito
Member
Uh that isn't how probability works.
Dusk Soldier
Member
Sawneeks, I may have been a bit reductive in my earlier posts, but the normal probability of someone flipping scum isn't 50/50 it's closer to 25/75, as scum only make up around 25% of the player base.
The 50/50 figure comes from the fact scum almost always target player roles at night.
Because of this, it's common sense for players with abilities to keep quiet about them until they either have useful information to contribute or they are under pressure to be lynched.
Blarg was neither of those things when he very flimsily soft claimed winning the xbox.
Which means he's not worried about being night killed.
There are only two reasons why someone with a power role wouldn't be worried about that. They either have a bulletproof like ability, or they are scum.
That's where the 50/50 odds come from. When he dies he will flip one or the other. Scum or bulletproof.
The 50/50 figure comes from the fact scum almost always target player roles at night.
Because of this, it's common sense for players with abilities to keep quiet about them until they either have useful information to contribute or they are under pressure to be lynched.
Blarg was neither of those things when he very flimsily soft claimed winning the xbox.
Which means he's not worried about being night killed.
There are only two reasons why someone with a power role wouldn't be worried about that. They either have a bulletproof like ability, or they are scum.
That's where the 50/50 odds come from. When he dies he will flip one or the other. Scum or bulletproof.
Lone_Prodigy
Member
Catching up here.
Page 1 is initial day 1 fluff. Conversation revolves are Blarg who claims he won the XBOX, and some discussion about who actually placed a bid.
About halfway through Page 2, when suspicion has been leveled on Dusk for some questionable posts (50/50, scum wouldn't be pushing a vote so early, let's not go for inactives), WAMD (Splinter seemingly catches her in a scum slip-up) and Blarg (says he won the item and then didn't), Kark brings out Plinko.
After Plinko, more item discussion, the contestants reveal themselves (Blarg, Kawl, Corn, CM), Blarg goes on about flavour until Sophia intervenes and says "flavour is flavour".
A few observations:
-Blarg is not helping with the fake item info and the flavour analysis. It's one thing to generate discussion; it's another to misdirect town. In a game about lying, town has to be truthful to have an advantage over scum.
-Dusk is making mistakes. It seems like scum who has tripped over themselves and are trying to salvage the situation, or it could be a well-meaning townie trying too hard.
-CM was the last to come forward as a contestant. And no one claimed to have won the item. However, CM asks a very loaded "does it matter who won the item" which suggests that a) they won and are keeping quiet or b) they didn't win and want the winner to come forward. Considering how they posted right after Blarg recants his item win, they had ample opportunity to come forward as a contestant, but didn't.
-After CM says they're the last contestant, no one brings up the fact that no one admitted to winning the item. Everyone is then sidetracked by Blarg reading too much into flavour.
-Finally, Kalor's post #322 above. Already narrowing the vote candidates to 2 when votes are still very much split? Trying to shoo away suspicion and discussion on anyone else?
Scum suspects for today:
-Blarg
-Dusk
-CM
-Kalor
Page 1 is initial day 1 fluff. Conversation revolves are Blarg who claims he won the XBOX, and some discussion about who actually placed a bid.
About halfway through Page 2, when suspicion has been leveled on Dusk for some questionable posts (50/50, scum wouldn't be pushing a vote so early, let's not go for inactives), WAMD (Splinter seemingly catches her in a scum slip-up) and Blarg (says he won the item and then didn't), Kark brings out Plinko.
After Plinko, more item discussion, the contestants reveal themselves (Blarg, Kawl, Corn, CM), Blarg goes on about flavour until Sophia intervenes and says "flavour is flavour".
A few observations:
-Blarg is not helping with the fake item info and the flavour analysis. It's one thing to generate discussion; it's another to misdirect town. In a game about lying, town has to be truthful to have an advantage over scum.
-Dusk is making mistakes. It seems like scum who has tripped over themselves and are trying to salvage the situation, or it could be a well-meaning townie trying too hard.
-CM was the last to come forward as a contestant. And no one claimed to have won the item. However, CM asks a very loaded "does it matter who won the item" which suggests that a) they won and are keeping quiet or b) they didn't win and want the winner to come forward. Considering how they posted right after Blarg recants his item win, they had ample opportunity to come forward as a contestant, but didn't.
-After CM says they're the last contestant, no one brings up the fact that no one admitted to winning the item. Everyone is then sidetracked by Blarg reading too much into flavour.
-Finally, Kalor's post #322 above. Already narrowing the vote candidates to 2 when votes are still very much split? Trying to shoo away suspicion and discussion on anyone else?
Scum suspects for today:
-Blarg
-Dusk
-CM
-Kalor
Lone_Prodigy
Member
To elaborate on a previous point about the item, I don't think the winner should step forward. If it's a pro-town item, scum has a 1/4 chance of hitting someone with it tonight (lower of course if scum was a contestant).
MagnumBoy20xx
Neo Member
Fake edit:I was writing this before dusk solder responded to Sawneeks and was too far into it to scrap the whole thing. I still think that I make some good points in this post though.
Alright I just reread the thread, and something stuck out to me.
Dusk's "50/50" argument: this has been one of the most talked about things so far,mainly because it doesn't make that much sense. Here's the argument I'm question:
The reason this makes no sense is because it relies on alot of assumptions. First, that blarg is a power role. We have no idea if power roles are even in the game. Of course, the counter argument could be that he ment that they would target item holders but that's rendered moot by his second assumption, that blarg's item gives him nk immunity. We don't know what the Xbox does at all, making assumptions on what it does makes any argument sketchy. All of this relies on the third and final assumption: that Blarg even had the Xbox in the first place. When Dusk made this argument, we only had two confirmed"contestants" Blarg and Kawl. The other two, CM and CornB had not chimed in yet, which means that Dusk was taking Blarg's claim as truth. That is the biggest assumption to make at that moment in time, especially since CM or CornB could have killed it at any moment beforehand by counterclaiming blarg. All of these assumptions are necessary for his argument that we have a 50/50 chance of getting scum by lynching blarg. It just retired on too many assumptions being right.
With all of that said, vote
usk Solder
Of course Blarg has since "recinded" his claim, but I think that that's just blarg being blarg. No one else has claimed to have the Xbox, so I'm just going to assume that blarg actually has it still it is stated otherwise.
Alright I just reread the thread, and something stuck out to me.
Dusk's "50/50" argument: this has been one of the most talked about things so far,mainly because it doesn't make that much sense. Here's the argument I'm question:
His argument is that the scum team will obviously target power roles and by claiming to have the Xbox, blarg made himself the primary target. Because of this, blarg must get some sort of immunity to nks, or is scum since those are the only two guaranteed ways for blarg to not be killed after making himself such a big target.
The reason this makes no sense is because it relies on alot of assumptions. First, that blarg is a power role. We have no idea if power roles are even in the game. Of course, the counter argument could be that he ment that they would target item holders but that's rendered moot by his second assumption, that blarg's item gives him nk immunity. We don't know what the Xbox does at all, making assumptions on what it does makes any argument sketchy. All of this relies on the third and final assumption: that Blarg even had the Xbox in the first place. When Dusk made this argument, we only had two confirmed"contestants" Blarg and Kawl. The other two, CM and CornB had not chimed in yet, which means that Dusk was taking Blarg's claim as truth. That is the biggest assumption to make at that moment in time, especially since CM or CornB could have killed it at any moment beforehand by counterclaiming blarg. All of these assumptions are necessary for his argument that we have a 50/50 chance of getting scum by lynching blarg. It just retired on too many assumptions being right.
With all of that said, vote
usk SolderOf course Blarg has since "recinded" his claim, but I think that that's just blarg being blarg. No one else has claimed to have the Xbox, so I'm just going to assume that blarg actually has it still it is stated otherwise.
MagnumBoy20xx
Neo Member
*until it is stated otherwise.
CornBurrito
Member
So far we had 4 people claim. Blargs alleged bid came closest to actual price but he claims not to have won.
StanleyPalmtree
Banned
Hey Magnum, i think your vote need to be on a separate line in order to count.
with Dusk,
im not very sure what to make of it, i guess i see his logic as unconvincing as it is, and i could see this as a towny getting to caught up in his own theory.
honestly im just more interested in where he goes from here.
with Blarg,
now with blarg, i dont really look at blarg like a puzzle to be solved. i look at blarg like and Abstract expressionist piece. Take in everything, the shitposting and the logical accusations, and find meaning not in what you think, but what you feel.
and right now hes feeling kinda scummy.
with Dusk,
im not very sure what to make of it, i guess i see his logic as unconvincing as it is, and i could see this as a towny getting to caught up in his own theory.
honestly im just more interested in where he goes from here.
with Blarg,
now with blarg, i dont really look at blarg like a puzzle to be solved. i look at blarg like and Abstract expressionist piece. Take in everything, the shitposting and the logical accusations, and find meaning not in what you think, but what you feel.
and right now hes feeling kinda scummy.
MagnumBoy20xx
Neo Member
I agree with LP on this one. While we don't know what the prize is for winning during the Night phase it should be a safe guess to say it's probably some sort of Power Role ( x-shot perhaps?) or even NK immunity. Having the winner step forward essentially makes them a walking target.
Dusk Soldier
Member
Magnum,
I mean at the end of the day you are your own person, and you don't have to agree with me.
Again I'm not making any wild assumptions.
It doesn't matter whether or not Blarg won the Xbox.
It doesn't matter whether or not we know what exactly the Xbox does.
It doesn't matter whether or not we know who submitted bids last night.
What matters is the fact that Blarg was willing to come forward, unprompted, and claim that he was the Xbox winner.
Why does that matter?
It matters because if at any point in the future, any point at all, a prize winner reveals that their item gave them an ability, a flip will switch in the scum chat, and they will decide that all prize winners have to go.
That may not necessarily happen tonight. Maybe one or two days phases from now. But it just takes one prize winner to reveal that they got an ability, and ALL confirmed prize winners become scum targets. They will not take a chance with this. They would be stupid to.
Usually players that win prizes or roles keep that information secret until they have something useful to tell town. This is because as everybody knows, scum do not want town players with abilities alive in the game. Not only did he tell us he won a prize, but he didn't tell us what the prize did or give any useful information to help town win.
He took what could end up being a very big risk to his personal survival, to not tell town anything useful...
Coming forward that early and claiming he won the Xbox demonstrates that he is NOT scared that he will be targeted by scum, and again there are only two reasons why someone would not be afraid of being night killed.
All of Blarg's actions at this point should be a major red flag to you. I 100% get it. You're scared to mislynch, but this one is a gimme.
vote: Blargonaut
I mean at the end of the day you are your own person, and you don't have to agree with me.
Again I'm not making any wild assumptions.
It doesn't matter whether or not Blarg won the Xbox.
It doesn't matter whether or not we know what exactly the Xbox does.
It doesn't matter whether or not we know who submitted bids last night.
What matters is the fact that Blarg was willing to come forward, unprompted, and claim that he was the Xbox winner.
Why does that matter?
It matters because if at any point in the future, any point at all, a prize winner reveals that their item gave them an ability, a flip will switch in the scum chat, and they will decide that all prize winners have to go.
That may not necessarily happen tonight. Maybe one or two days phases from now. But it just takes one prize winner to reveal that they got an ability, and ALL confirmed prize winners become scum targets. They will not take a chance with this. They would be stupid to.
Usually players that win prizes or roles keep that information secret until they have something useful to tell town. This is because as everybody knows, scum do not want town players with abilities alive in the game. Not only did he tell us he won a prize, but he didn't tell us what the prize did or give any useful information to help town win.
He took what could end up being a very big risk to his personal survival, to not tell town anything useful...
Coming forward that early and claiming he won the Xbox demonstrates that he is NOT scared that he will be targeted by scum, and again there are only two reasons why someone would not be afraid of being night killed.
All of Blarg's actions at this point should be a major red flag to you. I 100% get it. You're scared to mislynch, but this one is a gimme.
vote: Blargonaut
StarSketch
Banned
Currently split between Dusk and Blarg, waiting for the latter to make his case.
WhereAreMahDragonz
Banned
I get that Blarg is just being Blarg, but a good point was made that there's really no reason to lie about winning the prize other than to fuck with town and lead us astray.
Do you have an actual explanation, Blarg? I know that's your playstyle but I'm also really confused and you're doing nothing to help that so...
Vote: Blargonaut[/vote]
Do you have an actual explanation, Blarg? I know that's your playstyle but I'm also really confused and you're doing nothing to help that so...
Vote: Blargonaut[/vote]
WhereAreMahDragonz
Banned
I'm an idiot
Vote: Blargonaut
Vote: Blargonaut
oceanicair (0)
dusk soldier 53 (333)
cornbro (0)
*splinter 56 (153)
stanleypalmtree (0)
sawneeks 64 (307)
wherearemahdragonz (1)
*splinter 153
karkador (0)
blargonaut 206 (208)
magnumboy20xx (1)
blargonaut 215 (231)
karkador 222
blargonaut (3)
sawneeks 307
dusk soldier 333
wherearemahdragonz 336
dusk solder (1)
magnumboy20xx 327 (331)
magnumboy20xx 331
Majority is 11
Day 1 ends:
cornbro (0)
stanleypalmtree (0)
wherearemahdragonz (1)
*splinter 153
karkador (0)
magnumboy20xx (1)
karkador 222
blargonaut (3)
sawneeks 307
dusk soldier 333
wherearemahdragonz 336
dusk solder (1)
magnumboy20xx 331
Majority is 11
Day 1 ends:
Blargonaut
Banned
"fake item info"? Where are you looking?
I never talked about the Xbox's capabilities as a gift, thanks for the baseless accusation, LP
Hint: It's because I don't have the Xbox
And then you have the gall to chide me for misdirection?
Welcome to my naughty list, hypocrite
and no, scum deserves to be fucked with too
Blargonaut
Banned
Tell me, you ingrates; assuming that every Day would start with 4 named contestants in the opening post, how long would you all have spent talking about those 4 named contestants, and whether if they were the actual Nightly contestants or not, had I not secured early, tangible, public mod confirmation of the opening post's pure flavourness for you all?
You're welcome, so kill me
You're welcome, so kill me
Lone_Prodigy
Member
"I won an item"
"j/k I didn't get it"
That's what I meant.
"j/k I didn't get it"
That's what I meant.
Blargonaut
Banned
You say that its pure flavourness was a given, and that what I did was unnecessary, but I refute that; just look at how far my questioning of a "given" has brought your discussion, to the point of directing Today's lynch target (me)
If it was truly a given, the conversation wouldn't have went this far and in-depth. But continue revelling in your complacency, nerds
If it was truly a given, the conversation wouldn't have went this far and in-depth. But continue revelling in your complacency, nerds
Blargonaut
Banned
Where's your vote on me, brah?
keep talking
*Splinter:
- wants to lynch an active player on D1 instead of an inactive; thereby stifling thread bumps and therefore conversation going forward
- keeps on attacking me but doesn't have the Plinko balls to actually vote for me and stick to it
- continues to cling to my insanely obvious #bait posts like they're lifesavers on a stormy sea
- now that the mod has clarified the 4 names were just flavour (which through MY post contributions, I got the mod to confirm that for you all, thereby eliminating a conversation piece you all could potentially waste time talking about), he double-downs on accusing my previous and totally justifiable-at-the-time question of "Why are you lying (about being a named Contestant)?" of being "stupid fucking" (lol?) and advocating my questioning of him as a lynchpin on me; newsflash, fool(s), the mod confirmation I got for you all is the answer to my question to *Splinter. When I saw it wasn't going anywhere with him, I moved to mingle with the upper class for results instead, not peon(s) who sidewind away from a simple question. Why don't you furiously backpedal into some courage, huh?
scum will sort you out for me
Every game is my first game
Blargonaut
Banned
No one would/should be foolish enough to publicly counter-reveal my bid win claim, so as a contestant last Night who didn't win the bid, why would I pass up the opportunity to run interference for the real bid winner (who is hopefully Town)?
I could be lying about not having gotten it after having said I had, but I could be lying about saying I hadn't gotten it after saying I had. You know who you are.
Blargonaut
Banned
*Soldier
Blargonaut
Banned
3 others have the knowledge I possess, and 1 of them has more, owning the Xbox themselves; I assisted in the proof that me, Stan, *Splint and Kawl may not actually be all of Night 0's contestants, despite all of us being named as such.
and pls specify what "huge decisions" I'm Trumpesquely asking all 19 other players to consider; last time I checked, I wasn't the bro that advocated we lynch a Plinko result.
As a participant in the bidding last Night, I could've went 'fuck you, got etc.' like the other 3? are, and left you all discussing that named flavour without my insider input. That's gratitude for you. If it wasn't me who goaded the mod into confirming that was just Flavour, then who would it have eventually been? Someone would bring it up eventually. Would you lynch that person too?
and to top it all off, a false equivalence based on nostalgia as the foundation for your vote against me
That's fine
Blargonaut
Banned
sry, I meant Plinko worm
StanleyPalmtree
Banned
y'know what? i take it back.
his recent performance-art piece and further review of his initial actions has me feeling the opposite about blarg.
im thinking hes town.
his recent performance-art piece and further review of his initial actions has me feeling the opposite about blarg.
im thinking hes town.
Blargonaut
Banned
You're goddamn RIGHT it's a gimme
It's a "gimme a break"
MAFIA WANTING TO KILL PRIZEWINNERS IS OBVIOUS.
IT'S THE MOST OBVIOUS FACT IN THIS GAME.
Why would they NOT want to kill prizewinners?
These prizes can't just be meaningless MacGuffins, they're obviously x-shot power gifts; especially considering that a bid winner can't return to Contestants' Row for the remainder of the game. These prizes do something, and they do something that lasts.
You're acting like the fact that prizes do shit and scum wanting to preempt "confirmed" prizewinners, is some kind of monolithic revelatory #scumtell; what kind of inane, insubStantial accusation is this?
If people actually ride your shitpost against me, I would seriously question their motives, and/or ability for critical analysis
You're right that in the end, the points don't really matter; but take a step back and actually think about what a failed bid winner claimant can do. Fuck yeah what I did was a huge risk to my personal survival, that's why I did it. I'm a team player like that. And practical, too.
As much as I hate to defend Blarg, Dusk is ignoring a real possibility of a fake claim in order to protect the real winner.
That said I still think he's scum, and tbh I thought I voted him yesterday.
Let me fix that:
VOTE: Blargonaut
And now you're trying to claim credit for confirming that fluff is fluff?
Blarg I have some water here, could you just check its wet for me? Ta.
That said I still think he's scum, and tbh I thought I voted him yesterday.
Let me fix that:
VOTE: Blargonaut
And now you're trying to claim credit for confirming that fluff is fluff?
Blarg I have some water here, could you just check its wet for me? Ta.