Has anyone here read The Simpsons: An Uncensored, Unauthorised History? I'm about a third of the way in and I'm not sure, really. It clearly wants to dig up dirt but the history is really dependent on who to believe, and therefore I never feel any closer to the truth. One person says Matt is in the right, one person says Sam Simon is in the right, and then the book moves on. Basically the strength of the book - quoted from those involved in the show - also proves to be its weakness due to a lack of corroboration on anything.