So, who's gonna win tonight? Duff or Duff Dry?
So, who's gonna win tonight? Duff or Duff Dry?
That's where I got it from. Immediately thought of the visual charisma thread when I saw it.I was literally seconds from posting this.....saw it on imgur. It's depressing.
It's all digital now. And the lines are thinner now that it's HD and they don't need to be so thick anymore.The color scheme feels quite different. Everything seems brighter, and black outlines are thinner.
It's all digital now. And the lines are thinner now that it's HD and they don't need to be so thick anymore.
Ah yes. The digital computer age has destroyed the art of animation. Shame it can't have any real flair because the animators would rather use tools and mice instead of styluses and pressure sensitivity to make it look more realistic. Do any modern cartoons have any sort of realistic flair to them these days? i.e. they look like they were drawn by hand instead of computer?... Yes, I know that. I was adding to the comment above mine regarding how the thinner lines contribute to the sterility that poster noted.
Ah yes. The digital computer age has destroyed the art of animation. Shame it can't have any real flair because the animators would rather use tools and mice instead of styluses and pressure sensitivity to make it look more realistic. Do any modern cartoons have any sort of realistic flair to them these days? i.e. they look like they were drawn by hand instead of computer?
Nobody said that....please don't tell me there are "digital animation is the devil" people here.
Nobody said that.
Or did they?
I didn't though.
I too yearn for the days when cel animation was used to make cartoons (I think there's only one show left in possibly the whole world doing it, in Japan). It's just a shame that it's since become a lost art, especially since it's easier to archive if the cels are photographed onto film. I very much doubt that many shows that were done digitaly are gonna be given a HD remaster for that reason.Ah yes. The digital computer age has destroyed the art of animation. Shame it can't have any real flair because the animators would rather use tools and mice instead of styluses and pressure sensitivity to make it look more realistic. Do any modern cartoons have any sort of realistic flair to them these days? i.e. they look like they were drawn by hand instead of computer?
Naaa. It would still be a real strain on the animator's wrist.I wonder if the simpsons could be broadcast live now?
Well, yeah. They're still drawn by hand, usually with a stylus, but the program they use smooths out the lines and makes them the same width so there's no roughness or thickness differing you'd get with the old seasons. Plus you can copy and paste frames and just move parts at a time. It just makes the whole process easier. But in the end it also explains why that Marge+Maggie opening GIF exists. In the olden days, every frame was drawn by hand, so the animators put a flourish into her head spin. Now all they had to do was draw the head, maybe in a sort of 3D program, and apply a spin to it and bam, it's done. But it lost what made it great. Maggie shaking her fist doesn't make up for it as it's also just a looping animation of a computer program moving a bunch of vectors around. Not someone drawing her arm over and over in a slightly different position each time.And I'm pretty certain that most digital cartoons are still hand drawn. It's just that they're scanned and then coloured in on the computer.
From reddit.
Ah yes. The digital computer age has destroyed the art of animation. Shame it can't have any real flair because the animators would rather use tools and mice instead of styluses and pressure sensitivity to make it look more realistic. Do any modern cartoons have any sort of realistic flair to them these days? i.e. they look like they were drawn by hand instead of computer?
Also, later this year you will be able to buy Simpsons MiniFigures that don't look like complete ass...
Now that folks have their LEGO houses built, they're recreating classic Simpsons moments for posterity...
Also, later this year you will be able to buy Simpsons MiniFigures that don't look like complete ass...
Those aren't the same as the ones included with the house, right ? I wonder why they did that.
I always think it's funny whenever these images are put together and you're reminded that Yeardley Smith is just Lisa.From reddit.
Actually, I heard those two guy who made Aladdin and the like, are planning on making a new movie in the visual style of Paperman, set for release a few years from now (2018, I think).Have you seen "Paperman" (it's a bonus short film on the Wreck it Ralph disc)?
The animators tried to blend 3D and hand-drawing in a creative new way, and it won an Academy Award, so of course Disney had to fire half of the animators who worked on it.
Yes. I have seen it on YouTune.Have you seen "Paperman" (it's a bonus short film on the Wreck it Ralph disc)?
The animators tried to blend 3D and hand-drawing in a creative new way, and it won an Academy Award, so of course Disney had to fire half of the animators who worked on it.
That's awesome. I haven't found a spot to display mine yet but I'd love to do a scene or something. I wish I had a LEGO elephant to recreate that.Now that folks have their LEGO houses built, they're recreating classic Simpsons moments for posterity...
Also, later this year you will be able to buy Simpsons MiniFigures that don't look like complete ass...
Oh sure, I'm sure that some of them will be underwhelming. But the Homer you can buy separately is already a huge improvement. The only figure included with the set I'm not sure they could significantly improve on is Maggie.Also, how do we know they won't look like ass? There aren't any shots of the figures there. Just blank people carcasses.
Some of the obvious choices for additional sets would be Springfield Elementary, Moe's Tavern, the Springfield Nuclear Power Plant (granted it wouldn't be to scale), the Springfield Retirement Castle, the First Church of Springfield and the Kwik-E-Mart.I have a few ideas for some other sets I hope they make. This is one LEGO theme I would buy everything of.
from what I heard that's her only voice rangeI always think it's funny whenever these images are put together and you're reminded that Yeardley Smith is just Lisa.
Yeardley may have limited vocal range but her acting ability more than makes up for it. A bunch of sites (IMDB, TVTropes, assorted Simpsons wikis) have credited her with voicing Zia Simpson in Holidays of Future Passed but I'm inclined to think that was Nancy Cartwright as Zia lacks Yeardley's patented nasal twang.from what I heard that's her only voice range
Friday guys
And here's the official mascot of the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympic Games... Fatov!The olympics start today!