Error Macro
Member
It's not like they even need to tone down They Live anyway. The only time they ever show it is at like 3 in the morning.
"Sometimes they even call me..... AirHead".XS+ said:You wanna know what rocks? Watching RoboCop 1 uncensored on Japanese broadcast TV. None of this 'Ladies leave!' bullcrap.
Error Macro said:It's not like they even need to tone down They Live anyway. The only time they ever show it is at like 3 in the morning.
Eminem said:the sign in Die Hard 3 that reads "I HATE N***ERS" has been edited to say both "I HATE PEOPLE" and "I HATE EVERYONE"
Error Macro said:Except this was really cool because they actually filmed alternate scenes while they were making the movie for the eventual TV release. So it's not dubbed over or anything, it was actually shot that way.
"You get that court order, and I'll sue your funny face for wrongful prosecution."
Flynn said:Cool DVD box sets would include the bowlderized versions.
Error Macro said:I agree. I can't understand why they didn't include those scenes (or maybe use seamless branching) and the Ray Parker Jr. music video when they came out with the Special Edition.
Actually, you hit the nail on the head. The reason the line was censored was not in spite of the beer commercial or an example of some hypocritical, puritannical network standard, but because of it. Program content cannot seem to endorse commercial content, i.e. the beer commercial.Minotauro said:I was just upstairs in my house getting a glass of water when I overheard some lines from the movie Training Day that's currently playing on USA. It was the scene where the Ethan Hawke character spots a couple of crackheads trying to rape some girl in an alley. After Denzel's character beats the shit out of them and then threatens to blow one of their nuts off, he turns to walk back to the car and exclaims, "Damn, I'm thirsty! I want a beer!" Only, in this version, everything after the word "damn" is edited out.
Uhm, WHAT THE FUCK? Right after this scene ran, I swear, they went to a series of commercials in which a beer ad appeared. How on Earth does this make any sense?
Teddman said:Actually, you hit the nail on the head. The reason the line was censored was not in spite of the beer commercial or an example of some hypocritical, puritannical network standard, but because of it. Program content cannot seem to endorse commercial content, i.e. the beer commercial.
They may lose some of their impact, but I think that's an acceptable trade-off to be able to hear movies and songs on television and not have them butchered to hell. Besides, words that aren't obscene can still have plenty of impact; consider "I'm angry" versus "I'm enraged".scola said:There will always be "bad" words. If they are not considered bad by certain segment of society then they lose their impact.
I'm not sure what you mean by this. The newest English obscenity I could find was "fuck", and it appeared in writing in the early 16th century -- newer than many English words, certainly, but definitely not a candidate for "changing often".Bad words are certainly not archaic, that they change as often as (or even more often than in some cases) the rest of our speach speaks volumes about their importance
Right, not advertise during that block of programming. But it depends on time of day and particular network policy. Some of the examples I gave were more strict, because children's programming is more tightly regulated. And I forgot to mention that it's not always advertising conflicts, but sometimes "public responsibilty," AKA they don't want to risk even the remote possibility of litigation over product claims.Minotauro said:Hm, that's odd. I never even considered that. There's a ton of product placement in mainstream movies though. Do you mean to tell me that everytime someone drinks a can of Coke in a movie, the logo has to be blurred when they show it on television? Or, could they just not advertise Coke during the same block of programming?
And so do the video stores & premium cable channels! Who'd want to watch a movie they haven't seen before on TV, once you know all the various reasons that they have to hack it apart.Oh, well, I guess the scumfuck lawyers of the world need work too.
tedtropy said:I can understand that certain networks have to censor/edit movies before airing them, but instead of injecting insultingly bad replacement phrases that usually sound nothing like the original actor, can we just go back to the ole' method of just muting out the evil, evil words? Pretty soon they're going to start CG-ing on clothes during sex scenes for censored movies or something...
CaptainABAB said:I actually like these "creative" replacements, for shits n giggles. Thing is, if you really want to see the movie, rent the DVD I say.